search for: regexs

Hi, Can anyone advise me on how to compile R with Portland Group compiler on a Opeteron machine with Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 installed? I've edit config.site file to pick portland group compilers instead of gcc. Here is the list of modified flags: CC=/usr/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/bin/pgcc CFLAGS='-g -O2' CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/pgi/linux86-64/6.0/include

Hi all, The following tests fail because my username (csabaraduly) contains "bar" : ******************** FAIL: LLVM :: tools/llvm-objcopy/ELF/regex.test (47099 of 50832) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: tools/llvm-objcopy/ELF/regex.test' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /home/csabaraduly/wk/LLVM-git/__build_release_99/bin/yaml2obj

For ignore-undefined-symbols.s, the simplest fix ought to be to have the llvm-mc RUN line take the source from <stdin>: # RUN: llvm-mc –filetype=obj –triple=x86_64-pc-linux %s –o %t.o –g becomes # RUN: llvm-mc –filetype=obj –triple=x86_64-pc-linux < %s –o %t.o –g But in this case, llvm-symbolizer still prints the file as $CWD/<stdin> which seems like its own separate bug. --paulr

Dear all, I have made a fairly complex dialplan where I am using the REGEX function in many places. This works so far, but I wasn't able to solve the following problem. What I would like to do is the following (please note that this is normal regex syntax and obviously not what the REGEX function expects, but I hope it shows the idea): same => n(A1), GotoIf($[${REGEX("^\+49.*"

On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > If LLVM is going to have an integrated regex library I suggest using > it > regardless if the platform has one. > The LLVM integrated regex library will provide consistent behaviour > and > execution time, the system one will not. Hi Edwin, Can you propose the openbsd implementation as a patch to lib/support? -Chris

Hello. Building R-patched from source on Win64 using current Rtools 3.5.0.4, I?m getting the following notes indicating an extra left brace somewhere; or is the problem on my end? My installed Perl is Strawberry 5.28.0.1-64 bit. Thank you, Avi (Sent from an iPhone, so my apologies if HTML also comes through) ------ Making HTML documentation ------ creating doc/manual/version.texi creating

Woot! Thanks a bunch Edwin! Some comments on the patch: -- I'm not sure if it makes sense to import the man pages, if we only expose Regex.h. > diff --git a/include/llvm/Support/Regex.h b/include/llvm/Support/Regex.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..314bff4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/llvm/Support/Regex.h > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > +//===-- Regex.h - Regular

On 2009-08-24 20:14, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Török Edwin wrote: >> If LLVM is going to have an integrated regex library I suggest using it >> regardless if the platform has one. >> The LLVM integrated regex library will provide consistent behaviour and >> execution time, the system one will not. > > Hi Edwin, > > Can you propose

I've Dovecot and dovecot-sieve v 2.2.27 installed on a Debian 9.6. I'm trying to set a Sieve filter which will redirect all emails from `info` (i.e. .info) TLD to another email. This is the filter: require ["regex"]; # rule:[test] if header :regex "from" "info$" { redirect "subbs at domain.com"; } It's not being honored; all emails from .info

I think I am using objects according to the man page. This seems to be a valid regular expression. But whether I know what I'm doing or no, it still shouldn't be doing what valgrind seems to be saying it's doing. (IMHO) ---------- start of script ---------- Script started on Mon 01 Aug 2005 02:09:00 PM PDT linux$ printenv VALGRIND_OPTS --tool=3Dmemcheck linux$ cat bar.R foo <- 1

On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:18 +0100, Martin Johannes Dauser via dovecot wrote: > Hi! > > You forgot the wildcard '.*'?(=?Match zero or more instances of any > single character, except newline) > > require ["regex"]; > # rule:[test] > if header :regex "from" ".*info$" > { > ? redirect "subbs at domain.com"; > } >

I'm not sure if I should bother you team with this, apologies in case it's a bother. I'm trying gcc 6.2.1 (from devtoolset-6) with R, everything seems to work just fine, except for mzR. Here is failed build: g++ -m64 -shared -L/usr/lib64/R/lib -Wl,-z,relro -o mzR.so cramp.o ramp_base64.o ramp.o RcppRamp.o RcppRampModule.o rnetCDF.o RcppPwiz.o RcppPwizModule.o RcppIdent.o

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font face="Arial">Greetings,<br> <br> I'm running

Dear R People: I am trying to build R-2.5.0 from source on a Windows machinee. I downloaded the tools and such, and started things off. I received some odd errors messages, looked on the R Search and found a similar problem. The suggestion was to re-load "ld.exe". I downloaded and installed everything again. Same problem. I am including my output.

Hi, I found the following code on the net which should redirect all mails to another address depending on the time of day (useful for forwarding mails to work): require ["regex"]; if allof (header :regex "date" "(08|09|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17):..:..", not header :regex "date" "(sat|sun)") { redirect "address at

On 2009-08-25 21:18, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Woot! Thanks a bunch Edwin! > > Some comments on the patch: > -- > I'm not sure if it makes sense to import the man pages, if we only > expose Regex.h. > I'd like to keep re_format.7, it describes the format of the regex as accepted by this implementation. I'll remove regex.3 since its not exposed. > >>

Hi, I have question again about modifiers for pattern parameters. Vedant suggested such way. > CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: one_or_more(x): x {{+}} But I have some doubts. This should be equal to x+. This approach differs from standard one. In FileCheck I can write CHECK: {{x|y}}{{something}} This line will be equal to regex (x|y)(something). But if I use suggested approach and write same

Hello, I noticed (due to a recent post by Martin Honnen to clp) that Element.Class uses wrong regexps for its operations. E.g., Element.Class.has() will find "classA" in "classA-foobar" I also changed the interface of .has() to the more general one used in .has_any() --- util.js.old 2005-08-21 19:18:40.000000000 +0200 +++ util.js 2005-08-21 19:31:42.000000000 +0200 @@

On Aug 23, 2009, at 9:01 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> 2. Use POSIX regcomp facilities. This implies importing some >> implementation of this interface, e.g., Windows. On Linux, BSD, etc. >> we would try to use the platform version if available (and non- >> buggy). > > Don't do it. > They are ridiculous slow, and posix made some really dumb choices in >

There is a 2-block memory leak in the sub() (or any other regex-related function, probably) when the pattern argument involves a range expression, e.g., '[0-9]'. % R --debugger=valgrind --debugger-args=--leak-check=full --vanilla ==14519== Memcheck, a memory error detector. ==14519== Copyright (C) 2002-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==14519== Using LibVEX rev 1658, a