search for: regardsless

...r the domain still points at that first DC. I found, in this entry from 2014 ( https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-August/184301.html) that "Windows AD servers actually 'lie' about the SOA record, and always say that it points to themselves. So in a native microsoft AD network, regardsless of what the SOA actually is in the database, a DC always returns itself as SOA." So how should this be handled now? Do I need to manually keep track of which DC I want to reference with the SOA record, or is there a better way ? -- [image: Seaman Paper] Jeff Dickens – IT Manager Seaman Pa...

...? We need to decide whether to promote these log messages to INFO. > Should PuTTY change its 'perfectly OK to unceremoniously > slam the connection shut when you're done' attitude? I don't think they need to. I think it's fair that we log connections that are terminated regardsless of how graceful the termination was. E.g. why shouldn't we log connections that drop because the peer process got SIGINT or the TCP connection dropped before sending a SSH2_MSG_DISCONNECT? -d

...to promote these log messages to INFO. > > > Should PuTTY change its 'perfectly OK to unceremoniously > > slam the connection shut when you're done' attitude? > > I don't think they need to. I think it's fair that we log connections > that are terminated regardsless of how graceful the termination was. > E.g. why shouldn't we log connections that drop because the peer > process got SIGINT or the TCP connection dropped before sending a > SSH2_MSG_DISCONNECT? I will wait for the final verdict then. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, Opty

...es. Now I rename in one of the directory trees a file from aaa.txt to bbb.txt How EXACTLY can I tell rsync to synchronize the other directory tree. That means that in the other partner directory tree the missing file should be deleted and the new, renamed file should be copied? This should work regardsless on which side/partner dir tree the rename took place. Which parameters do I have to use? Thank you Ben

On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 5:23?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > 9.7p1 built from source without TCP wrappers and still no 'Connection > > closed' at 'LogLevel INFO'. > > You might be hitting this exit path: > > diff --git a/serverloop.c b/serverloop.c > index 4eabfced6..bf45f77a2 100644 > ---

...to INFO. > > > > > Should PuTTY change its 'perfectly OK to unceremoniously > > > slam the connection shut when you're done' attitude? > > > > I don't think they need to. I think it's fair that we log connections > > that are terminated regardsless of how graceful the termination was. > > E.g. why shouldn't we log connections that drop because the peer > > process got SIGINT or the TCP connection dropped before sending a > > SSH2_MSG_DISCONNECT? > > I will wait for the final verdict then. Thanks for letting me know...

Hi all, I have two sipgate accounts (numbers), if I have both accounts register only one will work for incoming calls (which is all i'm interested in). However if I disable either account the other account will work perfectly. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks in advance, Ray. Excerpts from sip.conf - [general] 8<---- SNIP! ---->8 Register => 1212121:aaaaaaaa at