Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "reg2a".
Did you mean:
reg2
2009 Nov 24
2
random effects correlation in lmer
I am having an issue with lmer that I wonder if someone could explain.
I am trying to fit a mixed effects model to a set of longitudinal data
over a set of individual subjects:
(fm1 <- lmer(x ~ time + (time|ID),aa))
I quite often find that the correlation between the random effects is 1.0:
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: x ~ time + (time | ID)
Data: aa
AIC BIC logLik deviance
2014 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r210424 - Revert "Do materialize for floating point"
...CK: swc1 $f[[REG3]], 0($[[REG4]])
> -; CHECK: .end f1
> -
> -}
> -
> -; Function Attrs: nounwind
> -define void @d1() #0 {
> -entry:
> - store double 1.234567e+00, double* @de, align 8
> -; CHECK: .ent d1
> -; CHECK: lui $[[REG1a:[0-9]+]], 16371
> -; CHECK: ori $[[REG2a:[0-9]+]], $[[REG1a]], 49353
> -; CHECK: lui $[[REG1b:[0-9]+]], 21403
> -; CHECK: ori $[[REG2b:[0-9]+]], $[[REG1b]], 34951
> -; CHECK: mtc1 $[[REG2b]], $f[[REG3b:[0-9]+]]
> -; CHECK: mtc1 $[[REG2a]], $f[[REG3a:[0-9]+]]
> -; CHECK: sdc1 $f[[REG3b]], 0(${{[0-9]+}})
> -; CHECK: .end d...