search for: refined

...remAbstractTypeUser[0x3a8c450, i32 (\2 *)][1] User = 0x3a8c310 REFINING user 0[0x3a8c450] of abstract type [0x3a8c310 i32 (\2) *] to [0x3a8c680 i32 (\2 *) *]! RefineAbstractType(0x3a8c310[i32 (\2) *], 0x3a8c680 [i32 (\2 *) *]) remAbstractTypeUser[0x3a8c310, i32 (\2) *][0] User = 0x3a8c450 typeIsREFINED type: 0x3a8c680 i32 (\2) * remAbstractTypeUser[0x3a8c680, i32 (\2) *][0] User = 0x3a8c450 typeIsREFINED type: 0x3a8c450 i32 (i32 (\2) *) remAbstractTypeUser[0x3a8c450, i32 (i32 (\2) *)][0] User = 0x3a8c680 remAbstractTypeUser[0x3a8c810, opaque][0] User = 0x3a8c310 TypeMap<>::add table c...

On Nov 12, 2008, at 5:07 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2008 18:58, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:37 PM, David Greene wrote: >>>>> Unfortunately, calling FunctionType::refineAbstractType(opaque, >>>>> void >>>>> (...)) >>>>> doesn't work because RefineAbstractType doesn't recurse

On Wednesday 12 November 2008 18:58, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:37 PM, David Greene wrote: > >>> Unfortunately, calling FunctionType::refineAbstractType(opaque, void > >>> (...)) > >>> doesn't work because RefineAbstractType doesn't recurse down into > >>> the > >>> pointee types. > >> > >>

Hi all! I¹m just implementing the Ullmann¹s algorithm for searching subgraph isomorphisms in graphNEL objects. The algorithm is running with smaller graphs, but when I¹m calling it i get an R error message saying that functions are nested too deeply in source code. I found out that the problem is in the so called refinement procedure of the algorithm which consists of 10 different functions,

Hi I'm using the llvm-c wrapper, and trying to build some recursive types (using released 2.3). I get an assert on trying to create a second opaque pointer type after refining a first. The first time through creating an opaque pointer type, a new type is created and returned from PointerType::get, but the second time, ValueType (the opaque type) is found in the PointerTypes map, which seems

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Scott Graham <scott.llvm at h4ck3r.net> wrote: > LLVMTypeRef a = LLVMPointerType(LLVMOpaqueType(), 0); > LLVMTypeHandleRef ha = LLVMCreateTypeHandle(a); > LLVMTypeRef atypes[1] = { LLVMResolveTypeHandle(ha) }; > LLVMRefineType(LLVMResolveTypeHandle(ha), LLVMStructType(atypes, 1, 0)); > > Can anyone explain what I'm doing wrong

Using the PPC frsqrte and fres instructions, I got the percentage time take in the smoothing code in _vp_compute_mask() down from 13.64% to 1.88% of the running time. In my local copy of Vorbis I have a fast_math.[hc] in vorbis/lib and have a _fast_sqrt() inline in fast_math.h. If anyone else wants to try it out, it follows. I can currently encode my test file (the first 15 seconds of

On 11/09/2007, Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen+xiphlists@runbox.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 11. September 2007 01:34:35 Ian Malone wrote: > > Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > > > By the way, I have bee discussing Dublin Core ('DC') with the > > > developers of the Atom 1.0 specification. It seams the reason they > > > created atom:rights instead of

...isfactory? > Go to 2. This would take us well beyond music alone and I > think that generality is a good thing, rather than specifying a > slightly pat and contrived list; 'guitar', 'vocals', 'drums', > 'theremin', 'bowed guitar' > 2. Refined. Where available pick from a given list of possibilities. > This is where you'd put type of musical instrument for example. > Options such as 'other instrument' or omitting altogether would > be perfectly valid. > 3. Free form refinement. E.g the 'bowed guitar...

Hi, I am trying to refine models of a continuous response variable and a number of categorical predictor variables. I know of some model refinement tools available in R that help in the selection of model terms like dropterm and addterm from MASS etc. However, I would also like to try to refine the model by 'coalescing' some levels of some of the predictor factors. Is there a standard

> On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 7:00:09 AM EDT, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > Expected, see FAQ 7.31. > > You just can't trust == on FP operations. Notice also Additionally, since you're implementing a "mean" function you are testing against R's mean, you might want to consider that R uses a two-pass calculation[1] to reduce floating

Hello all, I wanted to announce a new R search engine I made that covers all the major R mailing lists, CRAN, r-project.org, and more. Results are tabbed, so you can refine the search. Current refinements include searching just the mailing lists, searching just introductions, and searching the web for source files ending in .R. Please send comments and suggestions. If you want to add sites to

On Thursday 13 November 2008 18:27, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2008 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > > You shouldn't be refining the pointer, you should use: > > > > t1->refineAbstractType(t2) > > Ok, I tried this and I get further. But the type system seems to have > trouble when refining multiple types and those types resolve to the same

Hi, Keir, The following patches refines Xen support for CPU Xsave/Xrestore support. There are four patches included. Patch 1/4: Cleaning up existing Xsave code in Xen. Replace xfeature_low and xfeature_high with a u64 variable xfeature_mask. In structure hvm_vcpu, rename xfeature_mask to xcr0 Provide EDX:EAX with all bits set to 1 for XSAVE and XRSTOR as spec recommends

Dear users, I tried to fit an AR(2) model to data. This the result: > arima(vw,c(3,0,0)) Call: arima(x = vw, order = c(3, 0, 0)) Coefficients: ar1 ar2 ar3 intercept 0.1052 -0.0102 -0.1203 0.0099 s.e. 0.0337 0.0339 0.0338 0.0018 sigma^2 estimated as 0.002934: log likelihood = 1293.16, aic = -2576.33 Now, ar2 is not significantly different from

> Nope, types are immutable once created. The only thing you can do is "refine" opaque types to other types. There is a section in the programmer's manual on this: > http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#TypeResolve > > -Chris So I succeeded in using a "PATypeHolder" for the "opaque" type, define a Type* with PointerType::getUnqual, prepare

...Doesn't seem satisfactory? Go to 2. This would take us well beyond music alone and I think that generality is a good thing, rather than specifying a slightly pat and contrived list; 'guitar', 'vocals', 'drums', 'theremin', 'bowed guitar' 2. Refined. Where available pick from a given list of possibilities. This is where you'd put type of musical instrument for example. Options such as 'other instrument' or omitting altogether would be perfectly valid. 3. Free form refinement. E.g the 'bowed guitar' from above ref...

...not inline @foo(), and instead re-link the call site in @main to some non-optimized copy (or differently optimized copy) of @foo, then it is possible for the program to have the behavior {print("Y"); print ("X")}, which was disallowed in the earlier program. In other words, opt refined the semantics of @foo() (i.e. reduced the set of behaviors it may have) in ways that would make later optimizations invalid if we de-refine the implementation of @foo(). The above example is clearly fabricated, but such cases can come up even if everything is optimized to the same level. E.g. one...

Crontab offers many refined facilities for Western calendaring, but none for traditional Eastern-- lunar-- designations. So for example, if one wants specify regular occurring events on full moons or on new moons, there is no way to do this. Emacs (a text processor!?) accomplishes this. The math for calculating lunar c...

Hello, I am hoping someone can advise me regarding an error message I received and if needed, refine some syntax. I am wanting to calculate the word count for each row of a dataframe. Below, I have 3 variables ("V3.PD", "V3.HD", "V3.LP") which I want to obtain a word count for, by each row which contains these variables. Any assistance is much appreciated, Bob