search for: refererences

Hi Andreas, Thanks for breaking things up. I applied two pieces of this patch in separate no-functionality-change commits, here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=75623 and here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=75625 I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main

Hi, this is the first in a series of patches to cleanup and improve the LLVM Profiling Infrastructure. First and foremost this patch removes duplicate functionality from ProfileInfoLoader and ProfileInfo: The ProfileInfoLoader performed not only the loading of the profile information but also some synthesis of block and function execution counts from edge profiling information. Since the

...;admin/campaign", "newsletter"=>{"name"=>"2"}} how do i get the 2 out of the newsletter param? a little background: Its an email campaign app where there is a table with "newsletters" (name, url, etc) and another table "campaigns" which refererences (belongs_to) the newsletters table. A campaign can only reference one newsletter but, additional campaigns can reference the same newsletter. thanks -- Steven Ross web application & interface developer http://www.zerium.com [phone] 404-488-4364 _______________________________________________...

business I''m in can''t suffer that. Besides I need to justify to the business why I want to use puppet and produce a reliable solution that will scale in our environment. So far I''ve seen no evidence of this except for one user with 41 clients that is having performance issues and your offering that you maybe have somewhere between 1 and 1000 clients with "No issues

Hello, We are looking for commercial solution SS7 with Asterisk. It does not need to be "build-in" with Asterisk. Could anybody suggest something? Thank you in advance. Bart

Hello there. Just to let you know i have just put in production mode puppet on 41 freeBSD 4.7 virtual servers (yes not real servers but "jailed ones"). I had some little problems with facter at first but i have manualy upgraded the servers that where affected by the little "facter does not read his facts" problem i had. I should have missed something in my deploiement.

Hi Nick, Waiting for your feedback on this. Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 11/16/2012 10:03 AM, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Thanks for your reply. > > The usecase here is just trying to construct a valid ELF. The lld > linker needs to handle all sorts of code written in assembly as well > as 'C'. The usecase is just one example of it. > > I have also

Hi Daniel! Daniel Dunbar wrote: > I merged in my changes to your patch, which results in the attached > patch. There may be some missed merge errors. The main problem I have > with the rest of this patch is that it causes a regression in > llvm-prof's behavior. I tried running edge profiling on the > MultiSource/Applications/aha benchmark in the llvm test-suite, and >

Hi Nick, Thanks for your reply. The usecase here is just trying to construct a valid ELF. The lld linker needs to handle all sorts of code written in assembly as well as 'C'. The usecase is just one example of it. I have also seen similiar code in http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S?a=powerpc which has global and local labels. You are right, that the

Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > First, thanks again for undertaking this work and submitting it back. There is a > lot of good stuff here and it would be great to see it get back into the tree. Thanks for taking the time to review this, I know its a huge patch. I still have a few questions on how you would like this patch to be re-factored and split up. > [...]