search for: reengineered

Hi, I would like to suggest a standard where all packages provide an Rd page with the same name (or aliased) as the name of package so that help(<package name>) or ?<package name> is always here. This especially of interest to large packages with a large package index. This page could explain the package in general and gives some hints on how to start - not like extensive

...id add me on cc... :) I like the general idea. But why is this idea so removed from the current (rather heavyweight) Clang argument parsing library that it needs a full rewrite? I get that moving the argparse stuff out of the driver is a good idea so other tools can use it, but does it need to be reengineered so heavily? For example, 4/5 of your "scope" points can be handled by the current library architecture with perhaps a few implementation additions (typo correction, for example). It's just transforming arguments from one tool to another that isn't implemented. How do transforma...

On Aug 11, 2012, at 12:03 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Attached is a patch that adds tools/llvm-cltest. This currently contains code >>>>

Hi, Is it possible to develop a LLVM front end development kit which support easy language definition and creation with IDE integration like Eclipse Xtext, JetBrains MPS. All the needed C++ integration code should be easily created through the kit. Some other similar projects from which you can get ideas are DMS Software Reengineering Toolkit, Rascal MPL, TXL, ROSE, Coccinelle, etc. where some

Hi all, Is using a Citel gateway with Asterisk a good solution for reusing of the old Nortel digital phones? Would love to get some input from actual users. Any/all opinions welcome. robert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070510/bc5fc18f/attachment.htm

Thank you for this reply. However, I've already read this thesis. (Mr. Doug Simon in Sun microsystems I mentioned was her student.) This is a quite good article for reverse engineering but this is only useful for my alternative way which is trying to derive HL code from a machine assembly. This thesis is a little bit old before SSA form becomes quite popular so does not deal with any PHI

On 27/06/2017 00:49, James A. Peltier wrote: > Bind does not have a method to do multi-master replication. All updates must be done via an intermediary service (database). > > In our case, we've used containers and Consul for providing a highly available DNS service. A container will fire up and race for the master lock. It will dump the contents of the database into its named

Sarah Thompson wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Sarah Thompson wrote: >> >> >> >>> Do I understand correctly that there is nothing that the current gcc >>> front end generates that wouldn't fit an old-style GenericValue? I'm >>> wondering if this might be an interim approach that would avoid me

Good morning and Happy New Year 2003! Let it be prosperous for both you and me! Below you see a very short version of my CV as of January 2003 for your kind consideration and update. Word, TXT, and PDF version of the complete CV are available upon request. Enjoy the economic recovery! Make it a great day: ZAR ================================================================= ZAR PETKOV,

Dear Dr.Lattner Hello, Dr.Lattner. You may find your reply at http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-August/010479.html and other your replies to me right up and down at the list. You had suggested me to read the "structural analysis" section in Muchnick's book. Thank you for this. I bought and read it, which was very helpful but... I still don't have any idea

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Sarah Thompson wrote: > > >> Do I understand correctly that there is nothing that the current gcc >> front end generates that wouldn't fit an old-style GenericValue? I'm >> wondering if this might be an interim approach that would avoid me >> needing to rewrite huge amounts of code, and since we're not

Hi i am using a script which involves the following loop. It attempts to reduce a data frame(zz) of 95000 * 41 down to a data frame (averagedreplicates) of 95000 * 21 by averaging the replicate values as you can see in the script below. This script however is very slow (2days). Any suggestions to speed it up. NB I have also tried using rowMeans rather than adding the 2 values and dividing by 2.

Rowland, Thanks for your input. Per your suggestions, I have changed the global options in my configuration: [global] netbios name = FS04 workgroup = RSC server string = Samba Server Version %v security = ads realm = AD.RINGSIDECREATIVE.COM use sendfile = true idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 200000-299999 idmap config RSC : backend = rid idmap config RSC : range =

Hey Everyone, I'd like to begin a project to rework the scheduler to address some problems we've discovered on this end. The goal is to get a more configurable/flexible scheduler while simplifying maintenance by separating policy from implementation to get independent and interchangeable parts. This is going to be challenging because we are still stuck on LLVM 2.9. We will be upgrading

Hi there. I am using Samba 4.2.10 on Scientific Linux 7.1. I am currently trying to make an SMB share that is accessible to all of our Active Directory domain users. Additionally, this share needs to allow read/write access for our clients, who are using FTP. All of the subdirectories for this share represent an individual FTP user's folder. The share is named "ftpshares". The

Hi, I am a new user of R 2.8.1. I use Tinn-R for code editing. I use a windows 2003 system with 1 GB RAM. I am interested to generate dashboard and reports based on data from MS Access. These reports need to be posted on a weekly basis to the web. The reporting interface should provide facilities for "what if" scenarios. Is it possible to interface R analysis results to good open