Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27267 matches for "engineered".
2017 Dec 06
1
[PATCH RFC 1/4] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
On 29/11/17 09:41, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request.
> This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie at gmail.com>
> ---
> crypto/crypto_engine.c | 188 +++++++++++-------------------------------------
> include/crypto/engine.h | 46
2017 Dec 06
1
[PATCH RFC 1/4] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
On 29/11/17 09:41, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request.
> This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie at gmail.com>
> ---
> crypto/crypto_engine.c | 188 +++++++++++-------------------------------------
> include/crypto/engine.h | 46
2018 Jan 10
1
[PATCH 2/6] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
On 03/01/18 21:11, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request.
> This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie at gmail.com>
> ---
> crypto/crypto_engine.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> include/crypto/engine.h | 59
2018 Jan 26
0
[PATCH v2 2/6] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request.
This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie at gmail.com>
Tested-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne at st.com>
---
crypto/crypto_engine.c | 301 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
include/crypto/engine.h | 68 ++++++-----
2
2018 Jan 03
0
[PATCH 2/6] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request.
This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie at gmail.com>
---
crypto/crypto_engine.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
include/crypto/engine.h | 59 +++++++------
2 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
diff
2017 Nov 29
0
[PATCH RFC 1/4] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request.
This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie at gmail.com>
---
crypto/crypto_engine.c | 188 +++++++++++-------------------------------------
include/crypto/engine.h | 46 +++++-------
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
diff
2017 Dec 07
0
[PATCH RFC 1/4] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 11:02:23AM +0000, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
>
>
> On 29/11/17 09:41, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > The crypto engine could actually only enqueue hash and ablkcipher request.
> > This patch permit it to enqueue any type of crypto_async_request.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
2018 Jan 26
10
[PATCH v2 0/6] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
Hello
The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher request.
My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions
and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst.
This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request.
The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct
2018 Jan 26
10
[PATCH v2 0/6] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
Hello
The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher request.
My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions
and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst.
This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request.
The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct
2017 Nov 29
9
[PATCH RFC 0/4] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
Hello
The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher.
My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions
and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst.
This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request.
The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct engine and
2017 Nov 29
9
[PATCH RFC 0/4] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
Hello
The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher.
My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions
and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst.
This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request.
The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct engine and
2018 Jan 03
11
[PATCH 0/6] crypto: engine - Permit to enqueue all async requests
Hello
The current crypto_engine support only ahash and ablkcipher request.
My first patch which try to add skcipher was Nacked, it will add too many functions
and adding other algs(aead, asymetric_key) will make the situation worst.
This patchset remove all algs specific stuff and now only process generic crypto_async_request.
The requests handler function pointer are now moved out of struct
2014 Feb 15
3
[RFC PATCH] drm/nouveau: split off nvc0 compilation
So... I was wondering what the impact of splitting up the card compilation by
e.g. generation would be. Depending on the split things would get fairly
intertwined, so I thought I'd start small. This just splits NVC0 from
everything else. I figure that for the people this matters the most to, NVC0
is the least relevant card -- people with sub-1GB of RAM, older hardware.
With my config options
2014 Feb 15
0
[RFC PATCH] drm/nouveau: split off nvc0 compilation
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> So... I was wondering what the impact of splitting up the card compilation by
> e.g. generation would be. Depending on the split things would get fairly
> intertwined, so I thought I'd start small. This just splits NVC0 from
> everything else. I figure that for the people this matters the most to,
2017 Jul 20
0
[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements
On 07/20/2017 02:20 PM, yayo (j) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay:
>
> 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com
> <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>:
>
> 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run
> the command? Does it complain anything about these files?
>
>
>
2015 Feb 09
3
smbclient works with IP address but not hostname
Hi Ashish,
On 09/02/15 17:50, Ashish Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Graeme Russ <gruss at tss-engineering.com
> <mailto:gruss at tss-engineering.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've configured a Fedora 20 server with samba to share a few user
> directories and a printer.
>
> From a Windows 8 laptop, I am able
2014 Mar 23
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: allow nv04/nv50/nvc0+ parts of the driver to be separated
This will allow the nouveau module to only include support for
nv04-nv50, nv50-nvc0, nvc0+ cards individually (or in any combination).
Only compiling one of the card types at a time reduces the size of the
nouveau module, from 1.3M to 700-800K, depending on the type (including
symbols/etc). It should also yield a reduction in compile time as a lot
fewer files are compiled.
Here are the sizes
2017 Jul 20
3
[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements
2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>:
>
> Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected to the 3
> bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that.
> If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using `gluster volume start
> engine force`, then launch the heal command like you did earlier and see if
> heals
2014 Sep 15
3
Prepare the way for performance counters in perfmon
Hi folks,
This set of patches is just for clearing the way before introducing
the infrastructure for performance counters in perfmon.
I'll try to publish a new version of my kernel interface based on nvif
in a couple of days.
See you.
2017 Jul 20
2
[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements
Hi,
Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay:
2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>:
1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run the
> command? Does it complain anything about these files?
>
No, glustershd.log is clean, no extra log after command on all 3 nodes
> 2. Are these 12 files also present in the 3rd data brick?