search for: redunant

Dear All, I am new to R, I have one question which might be easy. I have a large data with more than 250 variable, i am reducing number of variables by redun function as in the example below, n <- 100 x1 <- runif(n) x2 <- runif(n) x3 <- x1 + x2 + runif(n)/10 x4 <- x1 + x2 + x3 + runif(n)/10 x5 <- factor(sample(c('a','b','c'),n,replace=TRUE)) x6 <-

Hi :) We currently have a single * box with 4-port E1 card terminating 60 channels: [PSTN] | | 2 x E1 [Asterisk] | | 2 x E1 [Legacy PBX] What I'd like to have is this: [PSTN] | \______ | | [*1]- - - -[*2] - DUNDi peering between 2 * boxes | | [Legacy PBX] Whereby a call in either direction would be routed either 'straight through' to/from the PSTN

Dear all, I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have successfully fitted a logistic regression model using the "glm" function as shown below. library(rms) gusto <-

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Bonnett, Laura <L.J.Bonnett at liverpool.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk > > I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have

Fixed 'maxiter' in the help file. Thanks. Please give the original source of that dataset. That dataset is a tiny sample of GUSTO-I and not large enough to fit this model very reliably. A nomogram using the full dataset (not publicly available to my knowledge) is already available in http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/tmp/bbr.pdf Use lrm, not lrm.fit for this. Adding maxit=20 will

Hi R, I am getting this error while trying to use 'lrm' function with nine independent variables: > res = lrm(y1994~WC08301+WC08376+WC08316+WC08311+WC01001+WC08221+WC08106+WC0810 1+WC08231,data=y) singular information matrix in lrm.fit (rank= 8 ). Offending variable(s): WC08101 WC08221 Error in j:(j + params[i] - 1) : NA/NaN argument Now, if I take choose only four

...sistance to using any PBX that isn't from a major vendor with a track record in the company management. I am going out on a limb for * as the features and capabilities as well as the cost seem like exactly what we want and need. If I go the Asterisk route it will be with a serious server, redunant power supplies, raid, etc... I will have a much better chance at getting aproval for this if there is hot plug support to give this project all of the features found in comporable products from Nortel and Avaya. Thank you, Charlie Hedlin

Dear R developers, I am newbie to R-development. I have written mutated the rpart to obtain myown package that performs some additional calculations on trees. I have altered the names of rpart's functions so there is no namespace conflict, but there is redunant functionality. However there some remaining functions that I am not sure what to do with. When I run R and load both libraries I get masking: > library(dI) > library(rpart) Attaching package `rpart': The following object(s) are masked from package:dI : is.Surv string.bounding.b...

hi, thanks for answers to my previous qns. have some more of them. hope it's ok to ask questions on the basics of CELP here. let me know if it's not. 1) synthesized filter stability after interpolation of LSFs I read from some resources that if LSF representation of LPCs is used for interpolation, stability of the synthesis filter is guaranteed. from another source, i read that the

I''m a new puppet user. I can''t puppetmasterd to start. I searched this group for the error message I get, but found nothing. Any ideas? [root@puppet ~]# puppetmasterd undefined method `name'' for nil:NilClass Using the --debug switch and ruby''s --debug option shows the following: [root@puppet ~]# puppetmasterd --debug debug: Parsing /etc/puppet/puppet.conf

Hello All, I am trying to carry out variable reduction. I do not have information about the dependent variable, and have only the X variables as it were. In selecting variables I wish to keep, I have considered the following criteria. 1) Percentage of missing value in each column/variable 2) Variance of each variable, with a cut-off value. I recently came across Weka and found that there is an

...ror_device *mdevice, > + struct page *page) > +{ > + if (!is_zone_device_page(page)) > + return false; > + return page->pgmap->ops == &dmirror_devmem_ops && > + dmirror_page_to_device(page) == mdevice; > +} Use new owner stuff, right? Actually this is redunant now, the check should be just WARN_ON pageowner != self owner > +static int dmirror_do_fault(struct dmirror *dmirror, struct hmm_range *range) > +{ > + uint64_t *pfns = range->pfns; > + unsigned long pfn; > + > + for (pfn = (range->start >> PAGE_SHIFT); > + pf...

On 3/17/20 5:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:47:55AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> I've been using v7 of Ralph's tester and it is working well - it has >> DEVICE_PRIVATE support so I think it can test this flow too. Ralph are >> you able? >> >> This hunk seems trivial enough to me, can we include it now? > > I can send

If I combine elements into a list b <- c(22.4, 12.2, 10.9, 8.5, 9.2) my.c <- sample.int(round(2*mean(b)), 5) my.list <- list(b, my.c) the names of the elements seems to get lost in the process: > str(my.list) List of 2 $ : num [1:5] 22.4 12.2 10.9 8.5 9.2 $ : int [1:5] 11 8 6 9 20 If I explicitly name the elements at list-creation, I get what I want: my.list <- list(b=b,

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104222 Bug ID: 104222 Summary: GNOME/Wayland desktop freezes when resizing Firefox window Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

...struct page *page) >> +{ >> + if (!is_zone_device_page(page)) >> + return false; >> + return page->pgmap->ops == &dmirror_devmem_ops && >> + dmirror_page_to_device(page) == mdevice; >> +} > > Use new owner stuff, right? Actually this is redunant now, the check > should be just WARN_ON pageowner != self owner I'll clean this up. dmirror_device_is_mine() isn't needed now. >> +static int dmirror_do_fault(struct dmirror *dmirror, struct hmm_range *range) >> +{ >> + uint64_t *pfns = range->pfns; >> + unsi...