search for: redistributing

The "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" voting is in progress at Linux Journal, and CentOS is Nominated in the "distribution:" category. So ... all you guys and gals who think CentOS is the best thing ever, get over to: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266 and vote for CentOS :) ------------------------------- Also, since write ins are allowed on the e-mailed ballot, if

Hello all, I was asked to bring attention to this LLVM ticket to the mailing list: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46201 - Missing LLVM NOTICE file is making redistributing LLVM difficult. It was recently noted by our legal review in release management that LLVM third-party licenses are scattered over different files, which complicates faithful license-preserving redistribution of LLVM to our users. Having a grouped license declaration of would make building redistri...

Hello. I'd like to ask about license issue. Now I'm planning to make and sell some measurement system controlled by PC. There is no technical issue but I don't have enough information about license. I will do the following, 1) Install CentOS and my applications on the PC. 2) Sell the PC as a measurement device. 3) Distribute DVD made from CentOS iso image file to the user if

libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.c | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.h | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_date.c | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_date.h | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.as | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- libswfdec/swfdec_filter.c

Especially on Windows, some common functions are missing. Use the autoconf LIBOBJS mechanism to replace these functions. This includes replacement functions for: Function names Implementation Origin getdelim, getline general purpose NetBSD under a compatible license openlog, syslog, Win32 written by me vsyslog realpath Win32 written by me

Hello: Skype for Linux version 4 has recently been released. An RPM package has been made, and it's mentioned in the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype#head- a08dbc518378653842007a2eec37bc32e13c0bd0 However, Microsoft claims to prohibit redistribution of Skype (http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/legal/terms/tou/ , subsection 4.2). My feeling is that the Wiki shouldn't mention

Especially on Windows, some common functions are missing. Use the autoconf LIBOBJS mechanism to replace these functions. This includes replacement functions for: Function names Implementation Origin getdelim, getline general purpose NetBSD under a compatible license openlog, syslog, Win32 written by me vsyslog realpath Win32 written by me

My impression from reading http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#clp is that it's intended to be possible to compile programs using llvm and distribute the resulting binaries freely. This does not seem to be the case. I'm assuming no portion of LLVM is included in the compiled binaries, only the runtime library components, so that the compiled binaries are not derived from LLVM.

Adding this SHA256 code made me read the BSD license once again. It says: * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. Then there are a few files from Cyrus as well which contain: * 4. Redistributions of any form

Hello there, My situation is as follows: =we make commercial freeware/shareware games =our games are released without code and can NOT be modified or have projects based on it. =would like to use Speex functions (library) within the game for some vocal sound effects, it would basically be a part of the EXE itself. Under the Xiph.org license, it states: "Redistributions in binary form must

Hi, at first I'm not part of the CentOS Project nor I'm a lawyer. But may I can answer your questions. According to the CentOS About page "CentOS Linux is no-cost and free to redistribute." [1]. So as you are planning to redistribute it should be fine to do. While redistributing you also need to consider the legal section [2]. However as you are planning a business you should involve a lawyer to make it clear to you in your special legal situation! To your second question: Yes you definitely should do that, as you make profit from the great work the maintainers do and can...

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:14 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > Currently this adds two useful header files containing functions which > will be consumed by filters in later commits. > --- > Makefile.am | 5 +++- > common/include/Makefile.am | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > common/include/ispowerof2.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Similar to C, OCaml and Rust, this is not a plugin per se. Instead it's more of a method and set of tests around writing plugins in golang. They are standalone programs that compile into shared objects that nbdkit can then load (so there is no "go plugin" between nbdkit and the user plugin, unlike in scripting languages like Perl). --- plugins/golang/nbdkit-golang-plugin.pod

Hi , I am using the plot function for some data , and the plot is coming back pure black , with scales on the side . Regards Malcolm [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi there, i'm new to vorbis (this list and the spec) - and i'm pretty new to audio-programming in general. i have a question consurning the license of the win32-dlls i get when downloading the vorbis-win32-sdk: am i allowed to redistribute these libraries with a commercial program? i want our application to be able to save .ogg instead of .wav but it's an application that customers

Hi I'm having a seemingly odd problem with flac 1.1.0: when I decode a large (CD size) flac file, using --skip and --until to extract a single track, flac appears to continue to decode until it reaches the end of the file: donald@klatch:~/arch/loveovergold$ time flac -d -o - --until=+1048576 data.flac > /dev/null flac 1.1.0, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003 Josh Coalson flac comes with

Instead of hardcoding the location of perl (assuming it is installed in /usr), use /usr/bin/env to run it, and thus picking it from $PATH. This makes it possible to run these scripts also on installations with perl in a different prefix than /usr. Also, given that we want enable warnings on scripts, turn the -w previously in shebang to explicit "use warnings;" in scripts which

I presume by now that most everyone has heard that, starting later this quarter with Netscape 5.0's developers' release, the Netscape browser program and its source code will become freely redistributable. They didn't say it would be GPL'd (GNU Public License) but they said their source code would be available in the spirit of the GPL. Initially it bothered me that the

I'm building my own openmpi packages derived from upstream SRPMs. Problem: The ones built with Intel's compiler can only be installed by force, because Intel doesn't register their provided libs with rpm. Any idea how this can be done? (Alternative ideas are appreciated as well -- as long as they don't read as: make Intel fix this.) -Michael

Thanks: Dan Berrangé XXX UNFINISHED: - Is using uintptr for the handle a good idea? Plugins must return something != 0. In other languages we would allow plugins to return an arbitrary object here, but this is not possible in golang because of lack of GC roots. - Default can_* methods are hard to implement. Ideally we would be able to test if a user plugin implements a