search for: redistribut

The "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" voting is in progress at Linux Journal, and CentOS is Nominated in the "distribution:" category. So ... all you guys and gals who think CentOS is the best thing ever, get over to: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266 and vote for CentOS :) ------------------------------- Also, since write ins are allowed on the e-mailed ballot, if

Hello all, I was asked to bring attention to this LLVM ticket to the mailing list: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46201 - Missing LLVM NOTICE file is making redistributing LLVM difficult. It was recently noted by our legal review in release management that LLVM third-party licenses are scattered over different files, which complicates faithful license-preserving redistribution of LLVM to our users. Having a grouped license declaration of would make building redis...

Hello. I'd like to ask about license issue. Now I'm planning to make and sell some measurement system controlled by PC. There is no technical issue but I don't have enough information about license. I will do the following, 1) Install CentOS and my applications on the PC. 2) Sell the PC as a measurement device. 3) Distribute DVD made from CentOS iso image file to the user if

...03c..d17768c 100644 --- a/libswfdec/swfdec_style_sheet.c +++ b/libswfdec/swfdec_style_sheet.c @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ /* Swfdec * Copyright (C) 2007 Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> + * 2007 Pekka Lampila <pekka.lampila at iki.fi> * * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public diff --git a/libswfdec/swfdec_text_format.c b/libswfdec/swfdec_text_format.c index ea1c675..543209b 100644 --- a/libswfdec/swfdec_text_format.c +++ b/libswfdec/swfdec_text_format.c @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ /* Swfdec * Copyright (C)...

...n/replacements \ common/utils \ server \ $(NULL) diff --git a/common/replacements/Makefile.am b/common/replacements/Makefile.am new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e5a5612f --- /dev/null +++ b/common/replacements/Makefile.am @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +# nbdkit +# Copyright (C) 2019 Red Hat Inc. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# +# * Redistributions in...

Hello: Skype for Linux version 4 has recently been released. An RPM package has been made, and it's mentioned in the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype#head- a08dbc518378653842007a2eec37bc32e13c0bd0 However, Microsoft claims to prohibit redistribution of Skype (http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/legal/terms/tou/ , subsection 4.2). My feeling is that the Wiki shouldn't mention this RPM, but I thought I shouldn't simply delete this part of the Wiki before asking here. Yves -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan at storm.ca> "La Esperan...

...n/utils \ server \ $(NULL) diff --git a/common/replacements/Makefile.am b/common/replacements/Makefile.am new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5051099a --- /dev/null +++ b/common/replacements/Makefile.am @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +# nbdkit +# Copyright (C) 2019 Red Hat Inc. +# All rights reserved. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# +# * Redistributions in...

...d binaries, only the runtime library components, so that the compiled binaries are not derived from LLVM. Is that true? The runtime library components state that they are licensed under http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php which does not contain a specific clause regarding binary redistribution. This seems to have been interpreted as not placing any restrictions on binary redistribution, i.e. that "all copies" has somehow been interpreted as "copies in source code form". (Different licenses such as Boost, zlib, and bzip2 etc. do not require copyright notices for...

Adding this SHA256 code made me read the BSD license once again. It says: * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. Then there are a few files from Cyrus as well which contain: * 4. Redistributions of any form...

...reeware/shareware games =our games are released without code and can NOT be modified or have projects based on it. =would like to use Speex functions (library) within the game for some vocal sound effects, it would basically be a part of the EXE itself. Under the Xiph.org license, it states: "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution." Does my use of Speex qualify as "redistribution in binary form"? The reason I ask is becaus...

Hi, at first I'm not part of the CentOS Project nor I'm a lawyer. But may I can answer your questions. According to the CentOS About page "CentOS Linux is no-cost and free to redistribute." [1]. So as you are planning to redistribute it should be fine to do. While redistributing you also need to consider the legal section [2]. However as you are planning a business you should involve a lawyer to make it clear to you in your special legal situation! To your second question: Ye...

...ff --git a/common/include/Makefile.am b/common/include/Makefile.am > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..4ce1723 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/common/include/Makefile.am > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > +# nbdkit > +# Copyright (C) 2018 Red Hat Inc. > +# All rights reserved. > +# > +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > +# met: > +# > +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. &...

...uot; feature "ocaml .................................. " \ diff --git a/plugins/golang/Makefile.am b/plugins/golang/Makefile.am new file mode 100644 index 00000000..961495f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/plugins/golang/Makefile.am @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +# nbdkit +# Copyright (C) 2020 Red Hat Inc. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# +# * Redistributions in...

Hi , I am using the plot function for some data , and the plot is coming back pure black , with scales on the side . Regards Malcolm [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi there, i'm new to vorbis (this list and the spec) - and i'm pretty new to audio-programming in general. i have a question consurning the license of the win32-dlls i get when downloading the vorbis-win32-sdk: am i allowed to redistribute these libraries with a commercial program? i want our application to be able to save .ogg instead of .wav but it's an application that customers need to pay for. it's not the main function of our program, it would just be a little "nice-to-have" feature. i've found this &qu...

...continue to decode until it reaches the end of the file: donald@klatch:~/arch/loveovergold$ time flac -d -o - --until=+1048576 data.flac > /dev/null flac 1.1.0, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003 Josh Coalson flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type `flac' for details. data.flac: done real 0m45.948s user 0m39.800s sys 0m1.670s donald@klatch:~/arch/loveovergold$ time flac -d -o - data.flac > /dev/null flac 1.1...

...git a/resize/test-virt-resize.pl b/resize/test-virt-resize.pl index be9c9b4..1923398 100755 --- a/resize/test-virt-resize.pl +++ b/resize/test-virt-resize.pl @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#!/usr/bin/perl -w +#!/usr/bin/env perl # Copyright (C) 2010-2015 Red Hat Inc. # # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify diff --git a/tests/bigdirs/test-big-dirs.pl b/tests/bigdirs/test-big-dirs.pl index 47f0760..40038b7 100755 --- a/tests/bigdirs/test-big-dirs.pl +++ b/tests/bigdirs/test-big-dirs.pl @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#!/usr/bin/perl +#!/usr/bin/env perl # Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat Inc. # # This...

I presume by now that most everyone has heard that, starting later this quarter with Netscape 5.0's developers' release, the Netscape browser program and its source code will become freely redistributable. They didn't say it would be GPL'd (GNU Public License) but they said their source code would be available in the spirit of the GPL. Initially it bothered me that the start.help() function in R tried to find netscape on your system and started that to read the .html files. I thought i...

I'm building my own openmpi packages derived from upstream SRPMs. Problem: The ones built with Intel's compiler can only be installed by force, because Intel doesn't register their provided libs with rpm. Any idea how this can be done? (Alternative ideas are appreciated as well -- as long as they don't read as: make Intel fix this.) -Michael

...uot; feature "ocaml .................................. " \ diff --git a/plugins/golang/Makefile.am b/plugins/golang/Makefile.am new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4f69f03f --- /dev/null +++ b/plugins/golang/Makefile.am @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +# nbdkit +# Copyright (C) 2020 Red Hat Inc. +# +# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are +# met: +# +# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright +# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +# +# * Redistributions in...