Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "recsys".
Did you mean:
lecsys
2017 Aug 14
1
weight in lm
.../10.1080/00031305.1968.10480476?journalCode=utas20
And it does not have the formula. It was a note on an earlier article by Cureton, who in turn cited an American Journal of Psychology article by Holtxman(1950, v63, 615-617).
http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.1968.10480435?src=recsys
Searching on that article I see the first hit is a citation to some R documentation for hte MBESS::s.u function, which does implement it as recommended by Holtzman.
If I were voting on this I would put greater weight on the JK&M but that's just because it is incredibly likely that I could...
2017 Aug 14
0
weight in lm
> On 14 Aug 2017, at 13:43 , Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at effectivedefense.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2017-08-14 5:53 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>> On 14 Aug 2017, at 10:13 , Troels Ring <tring at gvdnet.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear friends - I hope you will accept a naive question on lm: R version 3.4.1, Windows 10
>>>
>>> I
2017 Aug 14
2
weight in lm
On 2017-08-14 5:53 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>> On 14 Aug 2017, at 10:13 , Troels Ring <tring at gvdnet.dk> wrote:
>>
>> Dear friends - I hope you will accept a naive question on lm: R version 3.4.1, Windows 10
>>
>> I have 204 "baskets" of three types corresponding to factor F, each of size from 2 to 33 containing measurements, and need to know if the