search for: reconstitution

In my view code, I have <%= datetime_select "in_out", "time_in" %> which returns in params :in_out: !map:HashWithIndifferentAccess time_in(1i): "2006" time_in(2i): "6" time_in(3i): "12" time_in(4i): "20" time_in(5i): "24" and I want to save that datetime to a column in the db... if

...tools_3.2.4 ===== This lack of correlation doesn't happen if the survey design object has uniform sampling weights or if the the data is analyzed with prcomp(). Why does the returned principal component is so different from the predicted and the reconstituted ones? Are predict() and my "reconstitution" missing something? Are the three methods equally valid but with different interpretations? Is there a bug in svyprcomp() ?? Thanks in advance, Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle http://lattes.cnpq.br/9234772336296638

I have a legacy C++ application that constructs a tree of C++ objects (an iterator tree to implement a query language). I am trying to use LLVM to "serialize" the state of this tree to disk for later loading and execution (or "compile" it to disk, if you prefer). Each of the C++ iterator objects now has a codegen() member function that adds to the LLVM code of an

I'm not sure I have a clear picture of what you're JIT'ing. If any of the JIT'ed functions call other JIT'ed functions, it may be difficult to find all the dependencies of a functions and recreate them correctly on a subsequent load. Even if the JIT'ed functions only call non-JIT'ed functions, I think you'd need some confidence that the address of the called

Hi All- I am still trying to figure out the best way to handle facebook session for my users. Here is my current flow: in my "external accounts controller" 1) before_filter :ensure_authenticated_to_facebook, :only =&gt; [:authenticate_facebook, :edit_facebook] 2) when the user links into facebook, facebooker authenticates and redirects back to my application 3) i detect the

Thanks for responding. Sorry for the delay in my reply, but I was dealing with hurricane Sandy. Anyway.... My software build produces libmylib.so. The JIT'd function only calls external C functions in libmylib.so and not other JIT'd functions. The C functions are simple thunks to call constructors. For example, given: class BinaryNode : public Node { public: BinaryNode( Node

Hi Paul, I think you may have gone beyond what I understand in how the legacy JIT code works. It looks like the call to addGlobalMapping should short-circuit the named function look up that I described, but I can't account for why it behaves differently on Mac vs. Linux. I still don't understand how the external pointers persist between writing and reading, but it sounds like you have

Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > I don't think the code base changes are all that bad. We have a number > of them to support generating code one function at a time rather than a > whole module together. They've been sitting around waiting for us to > send them upstream. It would be an easy matter to simply annotate each >

How can I get the sessid from the current session object? For instance, I log in the system, and want to know which sessid I''m using. I''m storing the session using active_record. Later on, I want to restore a session finding it using the sessid. Thanks in advance. Fernando Lujan

On Apr 8, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > What gets returned by the landingpad instruction (%0 here) is normally a structure. LLVM doesn't typically treat aggregates as first-class citizens. In particular, you shouldn't store the whole structure to memory like you do to %5. You can use 'extractvalue' to get the different elements of the structure. If you need to

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi All, I have a query regarding LLVM,Can LLVM IR can restore high level information of base language. Thanks and Regards, Manish On 5/18/07, manish <manishagg22 at gmail.com> wrote: > >

Hello, I have some code to run on an XGrid cluster. Currently the code is written as a single, large job... this is no good for trying to run in parallel. To break it up I have basically taken out the highest level for-loop and am planning on batch-running many jobs, each one representing an instance of the removed loop. However, when it comes to output I am stuck. Previously the output was

Help I apologize if this message posts twice, but I do not think my last attempt went through. I am trying to use the read.table() function to read in a massive alphanumeric data set. I thought I might scan in each column individually and do a cbind() to reconstitute the array in R, so that maybe I could handle the numbers and the long lines of texts separately(some columns in the Excel

Is there any package that assists in saving and reconstituting glm and nls fits without bringing along the accompanying data? A quick search on CRAN didn't turn up anything. If not, how do other people deal with saving the coefficients of model fits? For example, I've run a glm fit that has 23 coefficents on data set that had 193,008 rows, by the time the fit was called. When I save

Hi, I'm trying to set up a "secure" VoIP channel between a Windows softphone client and an Asterisk 1.6... server running with OpenBSD. By "secure" I mean to prevent any man in the middle to reconstitute any vocal exchange nor sender/addressee/any header data/ of the VoIP call (in first step, I would be glad to secure vocal data ans see later for the header...) I had a

Windows XP Pro Rails 1.1.2 I need some help verifying this behavior that I''m seeing. BUG: Objects in session which are descendants of ActiveRecord::Base lose attributes on subsequent requests when using CGI::Session::MemoryStore. TO REPRODUCE: 0) Set up MemoryStore as the session database manager in the appropriate environment.rb file in config 1) Create a model object X that

On Apr 8, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Paul J. Lucas wrote: > On Apr 8, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Paul J. Lucas wrote: >> >>> This all seems to work just fine. I can throw a C++ exception either in a C++ object's constructor or in an ordinary member function and the stack unwinds correctly (the object's destructors are

What is the best practice for seeking to a specific (arbitrary) PCM sample in an Ogg file that contains vorbis, using libvorbis? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20150518/1d3bb0ae/attachment.htm

(I'm still pretty concerned that there are IR changes going in for a feature that seems incomplete and more invasive than really seems justified to me - though I admit I'm clearly not paying enough attention to this feature to have a nuanced/fully informed opinion & so maybe I just need to step back from all of this - but given the addition of new intrinsics, it seems like there should