search for: reconstituted

In my view code, I have <%= datetime_select "in_out", "time_in" %> which returns in params :in_out: !map:HashWithIndifferentAccess time_in(1i): "2006" time_in(2i): "6" time_in(3i): "12" time_in(4i): "20" time_in(5i): "24" and I want to save that datetime to a column in the db... if

...nning the PCA with svyprcomp(), from the survey package, I wanted to list the loading (with regard to the first principal component) and the scale of the variables, so that I can tell people how to "reconstitute" the economic indicator from the variables without any knowledge of PCA. This reconstituted indicator wouldn't be centered, but that's OK because the important thing for the application is the relative position of the observations. The unexpected (at least for me) behavior was that the principal component returned by svyprcomp() was very different from from the reconstituted indic...

..."store" and "getelementptr" instructions here and there -- fairly straight-forward LLVM code. I then write out the LLVM IR code to disk and, at some later time, read it back in with ParseIR(), do getPointerToFunction(), execute that function, and the C++ iterator tree has been reconstituted. This all works, but the JIT compile step is *slow*. For a sequence of about 8000 LLVM instructions (most of which are "call"), it takes several seconds to execute. It occurred to me that I don't really want JIT compiling. I really want to compile the LLVM code to machine code and...

..."store" and "getelementptr" instructions here and there -- fairly straight-forward LLVM code. I then write out the LLVM IR code to disk and, at some later time, read it back in with ParseIR(), do getPointerToFunction(), execute that function, and the C++ iterator tree has been reconstituted. This all works, but the JIT compile step is *slow*. For a sequence of about 8000 LLVM instructions (most of which are "call"), it takes several seconds to execute. It occurred to me that I don't really want JIT compiling. I really want to compile the LLVM code to machine code and...

Hi All- I am still trying to figure out the best way to handle facebook session for my users. Here is my current flow: in my "external accounts controller" 1) before_filter :ensure_authenticated_to_facebook, :only =&gt; [:authenticate_facebook, :edit_facebook] 2) when the user links into facebook, facebooker authenticates and redirects back to my application 3) i detect the

...re" and "getelementptr" instructions here and there -- fairly straight-forward LLVM code. > > I then write out the LLVM IR code to disk and, at some later time, read it back in with ParseIR(), do getPointerToFunction(), execute that function, and the C++ iterator tree has been reconstituted. > > This all works, but the JIT compile step is *slow*. For a sequence of about 8000 LLVM instructions (most of which are "call"), it takes several seconds to execute. > > It occurred to me that I don't really want JIT compiling. I really want to compile the LLVM code...

...re" and "getelementptr" instructions here and there -- fairly straight-forward LLVM code. > > I then write out the LLVM IR code to disk and, at some later time, read it back in with ParseIR(), do getPointerToFunction(), execute that function, and the C++ iterator tree has been reconstituted. > > This all works, but the JIT compile step is *slow*. For a sequence of about 8000 LLVM instructions (most of which are "call"), it takes several seconds to execute. > > It occurred to me that I don't really want JIT compiling. I really want to compile the LLVM code...

Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > I don't think the code base changes are all that bad. We have a number > of them to support generating code one function at a time rather than a > whole module together. They've been sitting around waiting for us to > send them upstream. It would be an easy matter to simply annotate each >

How can I get the sessid from the current session object? For instance, I log in the system, and want to know which sessid I''m using. I''m storing the session using active_record. Later on, I want to restore a session finding it using the sessid. Thanks in advance. Fernando Lujan

On Apr 8, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > What gets returned by the landingpad instruction (%0 here) is normally a structure. LLVM doesn't typically treat aggregates as first-class citizens. In particular, you shouldn't store the whole structure to memory like you do to %5. You can use 'extractvalue' to get the different elements of the structure. If you need to

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi All, I have a query regarding LLVM,Can LLVM IR can restore high level information of base language. Thanks and Regards, Manish On 5/18/07, manish <manishagg22 at gmail.com> wrote: > >

...utput was an array of [x, y, i] dimensions. The removed for-loop ran through i, each iteration filling a x-y slice of the output array. Now the function returns a single xy matrix for a supplied, single value of i. Is there a way to output to sequentially numbered csv files such that they can be reconstituted into the [x, y, i] array? I have tried: write(x, file=get("n")) Where n is the value of i the function is running for. But I get the error: 'file' must be a character string or connection Is there a way of writing out to a csv file numbered with the value of a variable? Als...

Help I apologize if this message posts twice, but I do not think my last attempt went through. I am trying to use the read.table() function to read in a massive alphanumeric data set. I thought I might scan in each column individually and do a cbind() to reconstitute the array in R, so that maybe I could handle the numbers and the long lines of texts separately(some columns in the Excel

Is there any package that assists in saving and reconstituting glm and nls fits without bringing along the accompanying data? A quick search on CRAN didn't turn up anything. If not, how do other people deal with saving the coefficients of model fits? For example, I've run a glm fit that has 23 coefficents on data set that had 193,008 rows, by the time the fit was called. When I save

Hi, I'm trying to set up a "secure" VoIP channel between a Windows softphone client and an Asterisk 1.6... server running with OpenBSD. By "secure" I mean to prevent any man in the middle to reconstitute any vocal exchange nor sender/addressee/any header data/ of the VoIP call (in first step, I would be glad to secure vocal data ans see later for the header...) I had a

...method `test_attr'' for #<X:0x39e0270> If you comment out the use of MemoryStore as the session database manager, your code should work. Simply toggling the MemoryStore setting will cause this code to fail or not fail, as the case may be. It seems that when the session is "reconstituted" back from the MemoryStore, something happens to the magic that allows the session copy of the object to know about it''s attributes? NOTE: Using the "model :x" directive in the controller does not help. NOTE: A model object that is NOT a descendant of ActiveRecord::Base w...

On Apr 8, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Paul J. Lucas wrote: > On Apr 8, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Paul J. Lucas wrote: >> >>> This all seems to work just fine. I can throw a C++ exception either in a C++ object's constructor or in an ordinary member function and the stack unwinds correctly (the object's destructors are

What is the best practice for seeking to a specific (arbitrary) PCM sample in an Ogg file that contains vorbis, using libvorbis? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20150518/1d3bb0ae/attachment.htm

(I'm still pretty concerned that there are IR changes going in for a feature that seems incomplete and more invasive than really seems justified to me - though I admit I'm clearly not paying enough attention to this feature to have a nuanced/fully informed opinion & so maybe I just need to step back from all of this - but given the addition of new intrinsics, it seems like there should