search for: reconfirmation

Hi List, I am new to this list but I'm using Samba since 4 or 5 years ago. Now I upgraded to Samba 2.2.2 and I have a problem (wich I am sure that was discussed on this list but I can't find the thread): Environment: Linux Red Hat 7.1 Samba 2.2.2 I use test config: ------------------------- [global] debug level = 100 interfaces = eth0 eth2 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = yes

(sent to freedesktop@ and sitewranglers@, please keep the discussion on freedesktop@) Hi all, currently we have a bit more than 700 user accounts on freedesktop.org. I suspect some of those are no longer active, but we currently have no way of detecting this. Some other large projects like Debian and Fedora try to detect activity through SSH logins, mailing list activity, etc. Ubuntu requires

A compiler built with LTO / PGO can significantly improve build times. Locally I see ~10% reduction in compilation times of Debug or Release versions of clang/llvm using an LTO'd clang compiler. This is not really news of course (e.g. recently also reconfirmed in https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/7/contributions/802/), but that made me curious if we can and/or should enable LTO and/or PGO to

Hi all, I understand from the document that I should be able to configure llvm with only specific targets by passing -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=some-backend to cmake. However, I get the following errors whenever I don't include X86 in the target list: CMake Error at cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake:127 (message): Library `X86' not found in list of llvm libraries. Call Stack (most recent

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Dongrui She <sarevokcc at gmail.com> wrote: > However, I get the following errors whenever I don't include X86 in the > target list: on top of trunk, it seems cmake requires at least "native" (for yours, X86) target. (I reconfirmed with -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=ARM on x86) For workaround, you have to include "X86" always.

Hi all, I am using rsync v.3.0.7 (protocol v30) on ubuntu 10.04. My rsync line looks like this, cd /home/shantanu/ rsync -av --files-from=bin/include-to-rsync.dat /home/shantanu/ \ /media/transcend/backup_laptop/shantanu/ include-to-rsync had directories in this format, bank/ dwhelper/ clients/ When I ran the script I noticed that a files in bank/10-11 were not getting synced. Upon

...s date. We have not undertaken, and will not undertake, any duty to update the information or otherwise advise you of changes in our opinion or in the research or information. Continued access to the research and other information is provided for your convenience only, and is not a republication or reconfirmation of the opinions or information contained therein. For additional information and important disclosures, contact me or see the ModelWare website. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. This communication is solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. We do no...

Hi I'm using asterisk 1.8.25.0 on CentOS 6. I have compiled it with all the calendar modules: *CLI> module show like calendar Module Description Use Count res_calendar.so Asterisk Calendar integration 4 res_calendar_ews.so Asterisk MS Exchange Web Service Calenda 0 res_calendar_caldav.so

Hi, WOW, this was posted over a year ago! A response now. The problem still exists. As reconfirmed in a post i read not to long ago (within the last 2 weeks?). HP jetdirect cards can only do one thing at a time. (HP has been writing Jetdirect firmware for 5 years, PLEASE HP you _MUST_ have the ability to fix it?! Or don't you??) This can be confirmed if you have an NT only shop. In the

...s date. We have not undertaken, and will not undertake, any duty to update the information or otherwise advise you of changes in our opinion or in the research or information. Continued access to the research and other information is provided for your convenience only, and is not a republication or reconfirmation of the opinions or information contained therein. For additional information and important disclosures, contact me or see the ModelWare website. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. This communication is solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. We do no...

LLVM is built in Release mode. The version is 6.0.0. I think that a similar code worked on verison 3.9.0. It is probably a null pointer dereference occurring in eraseFromParent(). I checked and reconfirmed that the instruction had no uses. Perhaps I should rebuild LLVM. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:03 PM, mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Hmmmm that’s strange. Do you get an

Hi Dominique, On 08/22/2014 02:27 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Hi, > > Christopher Covington wrote on Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:50:58PM -0400: >> With my 3.15.0+ kernel, qemu-system-x86_64 substituted for qemu-kvm, and the >> path changed from your arguments I get: >> >> 9pnet_virtio: no channels available >> VFS: Cannot open root device "root"

Hi Dominique, On 08/22/2014 08:49 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Hi, > > Christopher Covington wrote on Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 08:37:52AM -0400: >> Thanks for the pointer to this patch. I think I started this kernel half way >> through the 3.16 merge window. The last non-cherry-picked patch I have is: >> >> commit 6d87c225f5d82d29243dc124f1ffcbb0e14ec358 >>

If changing nothing else I would probably go with another list since that is what is done for functions/variables/aliases. Having said that, more than once I wished we had an easy way to iterate all GlobalValues or all GrobalObjects. Any thoughts on the tradeoff having a single list with pointer to the start of each sub list? Something like Func1 <-> Func2 <-> Var1 <-> Var2

Dear all: I have found a big bug on xen concerning time virtualization. Please let me show you the whole process: 1 Phenomenon when I run a JVM based program in IE browser in my Virtual Machine, I have found clearly that time at the right bottom corner in my VM gets more slower and slower. I studied the bug deeply, and found something below. 2 Xen vmx_vmexit_handler --> ......... -->

>>> Ian Clancy <clancyian@cel.ie> 05/10/05 11:45 AM >>> Prakash Velayutham wrote: >>>>Ian Clancy <clancyian@cel.ie> 05/10/05 9:33 AM >>> >>>> >>>> >Prakash Velayutham wrote: > > > >>Hi, >> >>Sorry for posting again. I would really appreciate any help with this. >> >>I

I would like to support __attribute__((target)) later so ifunc won't be opaque for compiler generated dispatchers. Thank you all for the feedback! On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Eric Christopher via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think 2 is the only reasonable answer. And to answer Reid's comment: > yes, it might be nice if we could look through it for

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 20:52, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 29/10/15 19:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >>> On 29.10.2015 18:49, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 29/10/15 17:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 29.10.2015 17:54, Rowland Penny wrote:

I got really strange situation with memory on host: xe host-list params=memory-free memory-free ( RO) : 10305536 (10Mb) xe host-compute-free-memory 3147059200 (3Gb) A huge difference! And xentop show different numbers too! I will keep this host online "as is" and I am ready to provide information for debbugging or perform needed actions. -- wBR,George.

On 29/10/15 22:58, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> On 29 Oct 2015, at 20:52, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 29/10/15 19:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 29.10.2015 18:49, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 29/10/15 17:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>>> >>>>>