search for: reconfirm

...SWORDS I find that Windows 2000 and Windows XP do transmit a empty password together the name, and that's why I get Incorrect password. I must stress that from Windows 95 and 98, logon reconnection works ok. Also reconnecting Windows 2000 or XP to a Win98 workstation at logon works ok, without reconfirming the password for every share. I tried with security=user and with encrypted passwords but nothing helps, I must reconfirm my password for every share at every logon. Can anybody help me to solve my problem? Thank you! Gabriel Juncu

...ll have both false positives and negatives. Explicit confirmation has false positives for mail that gets lost because of wrong forwarding or too tight spam filters, but should not have false negatives. It is also lightweight on the admin resources. My suggestion is therefore to require people to reconfirm their freedesktop.org account once a year. A simple way of doing this would be to send out a mail with a token to each person and requiring a signed reply saying ?Please keep my account? with the same token. This would also ensure we have relativetly up-to-date email forwarding set up for all use...

A compiler built with LTO / PGO can significantly improve build times. Locally I see ~10% reduction in compilation times of Debug or Release versions of clang/llvm using an LTO'd clang compiler. This is not really news of course (e.g. recently also reconfirmed in https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/7/contributions/802/), but that made me curious if we can and/or should enable LTO and/or PGO to create our prebuilt binaries? The disadvantage for our release people will be obvious: that will take a lot more time and resources. But would it be worth to ma...

Hi all, I understand from the document that I should be able to configure llvm with only specific targets by passing -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=some-backend to cmake. However, I get the following errors whenever I don't include X86 in the target list: CMake Error at cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake:127 (message): Library `X86' not found in list of llvm libraries. Call Stack (most recent

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Dongrui She <sarevokcc at gmail.com> wrote: > However, I get the following errors whenever I don't include X86 in the > target list: on top of trunk, it seems cmake requires at least "native" (for yours, X86) target. (I reconfirmed with -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=ARM on x86) For workaround, you have to include "X86" always. ...Takumi

...-rsync had directories in this format, bank/ dwhelper/ clients/ When I ran the script I noticed that a files in bank/10-11 were not getting synced. Upon adding "-r" with "-av" the files got synced properly. I think when one supplies "-a", "-r" is implied. I reconfirmed this from man-page where it says "-a" is equal to "-rlptgoD". Am I missing anything from the man-page for this? Thanks, Shantanu --

...s date. We have not undertaken, and will not undertake, any duty to update the information or otherwise advise you of changes in our opinion or in the research or information. Continued access to the research and other information is provided for your convenience only, and is not a republication or reconfirmation of the opinions or information contained therein. For additional information and important disclosures, contact me or see the ModelWare website. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. This communication is solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. We...

...applicatio : Playback Notify appdata : tt-weasels Refresh time : 1 Timeframe : 3600 Autoreminder : 10 Events ------ *CLI> The firewall on this machine is pretty permissive but I even turned that off for a while to see if that was the problem but it had no effect. I've reconfirmed the Google credentials and I've also tried making the calendar public but I never see any events that I have added. I have set reminders on the events themselves as I know they wont show without this. Can anyone give me any pointers on where to look to debug as I'm struggling a touch r...

Hi, WOW, this was posted over a year ago! A response now. The problem still exists. As reconfirmed in a post i read not to long ago (within the last 2 weeks?). HP jetdirect cards can only do one thing at a time. (HP has been writing Jetdirect firmware for 5 years, PLEASE HP you _MUST_ have the ability to fix it?! Or don't you??) This can be confirmed if you have an NT only shop. In the...

...s date. We have not undertaken, and will not undertake, any duty to update the information or otherwise advise you of changes in our opinion or in the research or information. Continued access to the research and other information is provided for your convenience only, and is not a republication or reconfirmation of the opinions or information contained therein. For additional information and important disclosures, contact me or see the ModelWare website. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. This communication is solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. We...

LLVM is built in Release mode. The version is 6.0.0. I think that a similar code worked on verison 3.9.0. It is probably a null pointer dereference occurring in eraseFromParent(). I checked and reconfirmed that the instruction had no uses. Perhaps I should rebuild LLVM. Thanks. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:03 PM, mayuyu.io <admin at mayuyu.io> wrote: > Hmmmm that’s strange. Do you get an assert when you build LLVM with this > code in Debug Mode or is it simply null pointer dereference? &g...

...c358 Merge: 338c09a 22001f6 Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu Jun 12 23:06:23 2014 -0700 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client So I do have the change you pointed out. Nevertheless, I'll reconfirm with the latest torvalds/master. Thanks, Christopher -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation.

...r the pointer to this patch. I think I started this kernel half way >> through the 3.16 merge window. The last non-cherry-picked patch I have is: >> >> commit 6d87c225f5d82d29243dc124f1ffcbb0e14ec358 >> >> So I do have the change you pointed out. Nevertheless, I'll reconfirm with the >> latest torvalds/master. > > Right, so you already do have it. I don't think there's been anything > else 9P related recently, so it probably will not help much -- sorry for > blindly assuming it would be this. > > Actually reading the error message now,...

...having another list might be a bit annoying is the symbol iterator of IRObjectFile. Cheers, Rafael On 22 December 2015 at 08:23, Dmitry Polukhin <dmitry.polukhin at gmail.com> wrote: > I start prototyping second approach that makes ifunc new type of > GlobalValue. And I would like to reconfirm how much we would like to share > between aliases and ifuncs. For example, should Module have separate lists > of aliases and ifuncs or they both should be in the same list of indirect > symbols? If ifuncs and aliases are in separate lists, common base class is > less useful and I found...

...heduleAtFixedRate(), Informations from Internet told me this function scheduleAtFixedRate demands a higher time resolution. so I guess the whole process may be this: java wants a higher time resolution timer, so it changes the RTC's rate from 15.625ms(64HZ) to 976.562us(1024HZ), after that, it reconfirms whether the time is accurate as expected, but it's sorry to get some notice it 's not accurate either. so it sets the RTC's rate from 15.625ms(64HZ) to 976.562us(1024HZ) again and again..., at last, results in a slow system timer in vm. there is also a frequently called function going...

...gt; 10.1.20.34 CMC-NT<1c> ***************************** Here 10.10.80.111 is my BDC. I am happy now. Now even the logging is working fine. Hope this thread helps someone in distress over the same issue. I have one last quick question. I know this has been answered in the Samba-3 HOWTO, just reconfirming. I will need to replicate the folders for the different services (like netlogon, profiles etc.) onto the BDC manually correct? And what should be the way I indicate the logon server from inside smb.conf. Is it %L? Thanks, Prakash

I would like to support __attribute__((target)) later so ifunc won't be opaque for compiler generated dispatchers. Thank you all for the feedback! On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Eric Christopher via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think 2 is the only reasonable answer. And to answer Reid's comment: > yes, it might be nice if we could look through it for

...lly a problem because the users are automatically given an xidNumber and this is used instead and most people only use the DC for authentication. You only need the libnss_winbind links and pam (or something in its place) if you want your users to connect to the member server. >> Let me just reconfirm something. Is PAM still needed if I used RID as a mapping backend instead of AD? I'm asking because I came accross other tutorials how to set up a samba member server and it didn't involve pam. The main difference in the config was the backend which is RID in their case. In the Arch Wik...

I got really strange situation with memory on host: xe host-list params=memory-free memory-free ( RO) : 10305536 (10Mb) xe host-compute-free-memory 3147059200 (3Gb) A huge difference! And xentop show different numbers too! I will keep this host online "as is" and I am ready to provide information for debbugging or perform needed actions. -- wBR,George.

...ot really a problem because the users are automatically given an xidNumber and this is used instead and most people only use the DC for authentication. You only need the libnss_winbind links and pam (or something in its place) if you want your users to connect to the member server. > Let me just reconfirm something. Is PAM still needed if I used RID as a mapping backend instead of AD? Yes, pam is still required. I am no expert, but this is how I think nsswitch works: when you run 'getent passwd user' it checks in /etc/nsswitch.conf for what the 'passwd' line contains It then chec...