Displaying 20 results from an estimated 312 matches for "reassembled".
Did you mean:
reassemble
2009 Sep 06
2
smbd uses 10 to 15% CPU w/Vista client
...2 192.168.40.46 TCP microsoft-ds > 58439 [ACK] Seq=3096 Ack=177 Win=41664 Len=0
7 0.015300 192.168.40.2 192.168.40.46 DCERPC Response: call_id: 5 ctx_id: 0
8 0.019147 192.168.40.46 192.168.40.2 TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
9 0.019199 192.168.40.46 192.168.40.2 DCERPC Request: call_id: 6 opnum: 53 ctx_id: 0
10 0.019619 192.168.40.2 192.168.40.46 TCP microsoft-ds > 58439 [ACK] Seq=4220 Ack=2429 Win=41629 Len=0
11 0.024679 192.168.40.2 19...
2006 May 31
1
printing fails for SPOOLSS OpenPrinterEx request
...response, level 2, Insufficient buffer
client server SPOOLSS GetPrinter request, level 2
server client SPOOLSS GetPrinter response, level 2
client server SPOOLSS OpenPrinterEx request, \\jackdaw\test
server client SPOOLSS OpenPrinterEx response
client server TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
client server TCP [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
client server SPOOLSS GetPrinter request, level 2
server client TCP netbios-ssn > plato-lm [ACK] Seq=1621 Ack=5111 Win=32767 Len=0
server client SMB Pipe TransactNmPipe Response, FID: 0x7168
client server SMB Rea...
2006 May 14
1
reassemble large packets in switch mode
...n0 interface is part of a Linux bridge,
witch is ipv4 configured.
Setup host B:
Makes connections to host
A, beside this its configured similar.
Now it seems large packets can not be transmitted.
I verified it step by step the way with tcpdump.
A ping with a size larger then 1400 byte gets not
reassembled in the tincd on host B, no matter witch
side i use.
On host A i see the fragmented udp packets arrive,
assembled to a large ping and show up on the bridge
interface. Then those pings gets answered and find
there way back to host B nicely. They arrive on host
B as udp fragments but then dont show u...
2008 Nov 26
2
Reassemble software RAID
I have a machine on CentOS 5 with two disks in RAID1 using Linux software
RAID. /dev/md0 is a small boot partition, /dev/md1 spans the rest of the
disk(s). /dev/md1 is managed by LVM and holds the system partition and
several other partitions. I had to take out disk sda from the RAID and low
level format it with the tool provided by Samsung. Now I put it back and
want to reassemble the array.
2014 Oct 14
1
debugging T.38 issues
...6 ARP Who has
192.168.196.94? Tell 192.168.196.3
117.435899 ac:f2:c5:35:ed:66 -> 28:92:4a:34:19:72 ARP 192.168.196.94
is at ac:f2:c5:35:ed:66
118.677727 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket
Seq=00004 data:v21: hdlc-data[FFC00400006AAA...] (HDLC fragment 0)
hdlc-fcs-OK (HDLC Reassembled: NSF - Non-Standard Facilities)
119.387802 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.196.3 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket
Seq=00005 data:v21: hdlc-data[FFC002CCCC6C2C...] (HDLC fragment 0)
hdlc-fcs-OK (HDLC Reassembled: CSI - Called Subscriber Identification
- Number:042404633)
119.817794 192.168.196.94 -> 192.168.1...
2018 Jun 06
0
FYI: CVE-2018-11806 Qemu: slirp: heap buffer overflow while reassembling fragmented datagrams
There's a heap overflow in qemu SLIRP which affects libguestfs,
potentially allowing a malicious filesystem to take control of the
confining qemu process and from there attack the host.
It will affect libguestfs specifically when these two conditions are
both met:
- You're using the ‘direct’ backend.
- Networking is enabled.
The direct backend is the default upstream, but not in
2020 May 04
3
Parallel transfers with sftp (call for testing / advice)
Le 10/04/2020 ? 01:55, Darren Tucker a ?crit?:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 01:34, Cyril Servant <cyril.servant at gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> Each of our front
>> nodes has an outgoing bandwidth limit (let's say 1Gb/s each, generally more
>> limited by the CPU than by the network bandwidth),
> You might also want to experiment with the Ciphers and MACs since
>
2005 Sep 27
2
Stream "Saving" and Excerpting...
...r) and saving it to hour-long files, then
reassembling excerpts from these files (sometimes spanning two or three)
into a single file for playback.
I've got two problems (well, related to this, but anyway).
1) The "chunk" files I'm saving into have mangled headers.
2) The "reassembled" files also have mangled headers.
Now, I didn't write the code that does this (it's some python mess), but
I'm rewriting the assembler part and starting from the source code for
"vcut". The problem with that is that "vcut" seems to use several API
calls not do...
2003 Aug 28
0
[louisk@bend.com: snort, postgres, bridge]
...l_limit [number] - difference of ttl to accept without alerting
# will cause false positves with router flap
#
# Frag2 uses Generator ID 113 and uses the following SIDS
# for that GID:
# SID Event description
# ----- -------------------
# 1 Oversized fragment (reassembled frag > 64k bytes)
# 2 Teardrop-type attack
preprocessor frag2
# stream4: stateful inspection/stream reassembly for Snort
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Use in concert with the -z [all|est] command line switch to defeat
# stick/snot against TCP...
2013 Feb 13
3
Unusual TCP/IP Packet Size
Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the following interface:
msk0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
options=c011b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE>
ether 00:11:2f:2a:c7:03
inet 10.0.1.199 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet6 fe80::211:2fff:fe2a:c703%msk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid
2006 Mar 14
1
Delay with printer properties
...rinter properties page with a Windows XP, SP1 system,
something around 800 network packets travel between the client and the
server. When doing the same with Service Pack 2 installed, 20.000-40.000
packets are travelling through the wire. The additional packets all look
the same:
[TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
DCERCP Request: call_id: 7 opnum: 53 ctx_id....
microsoft-ds > 1227 [ACK] Seq=3937 Ack=....
It looks like as if much data is travelling and segmented due to data
size. If a reassemble one of this segment chains I get a packet with
something around 170k data in it. And there are many of t...
2015 Apr 10
1
smbclient 4.0.7 fails transfer with STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER and SMB2 but not with NT1
...PDF file.
These are the packets leading up to SMB2 failing after the transfer:
No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info
266 2015-04-09 08:30:43.688568000 10.5.12.227 10.6.161.184 TCP 1514 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info
267 2015-04-09 08:30:43.688696000 10.5.12.227 10.6.161.184 TCP 1514 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
No. Time Source...
2019 Apr 04
2
RAID1 boot issue
Right, that's my problem.
a drive is unplugged... while the system is not running mdadm will not reassemble the array on boot.
Red Hat Bugzilla ? Bug 1451660
Write that Fixed In Version:dracut-033-546.el7
I have drucat version 033-554.el7 and this bag don't fixed!
>I believe you are hitting this bug:
>
> ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451660
>
>That is,
2001 Mar 31
1
Ogg Vorbis compatible with Darwin Streaming Server?
Hi,
I saw the documentation "RTP Payload Format for Vorbis Encoded Audio".
My question: The Darwin Streaming Server (OpenSource and free for
several plattforms) streams media with RTSP/RTP.
For more information:
http://www.publicsource.apple.com/projects/streaming/
I know that a QuickTime Component of Ogg Vorbis
(compressor/decompressor) in progress. (Thanks guys) Could I stream Ogg
2019 Feb 11
3
bare-metal backup before update--options?
Hi all!
I'm a "nervous nellie", I have not yet updated my 7.5 desktop to 7.6
because (1) it has an Nvidia card, and (2) I've heard of problems
upgrading on top of software RAID (using RAID1 with 2 drives).
I need to upgrade it to stay secure, and I want to do a bare-metal backup
first (so I can put it all back as it now is, in case it explodes in my
face), so I'm trying to
2020 May 05
7
Parallel transfers with sftp (call for testing / advice)
Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> Matthieu Hautreux wrote:
>> The change proposed by Cyril in sftp is a very pragmatic approach to
>> deal with parallelism at the file transfer level. It leverages the
>> already existing sftp protocol and its capability to write/read file
>> content at specified offsets. This enables to speed up sftp transfers
>> significantly by
2009 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] disassembly/decompiling
Hi, just read the LLVM 2.6 release announcement, the bit about llvm-mc caught
my attention. I've been looking for a tool to disassemble x86 object files
into an IR and then reassemble them into x86_64 object code. The immediate use
for them would be to convert driver blobs that some vendors provide for their
hardware (e.g. the Lucent modem driver) so they can be used in a 64 bit
kernel.
2020 May 06
2
Parallel transfers with sftp (call for testing / advice)
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:31 AM Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
>
> Matthieu Hautreux wrote:
> > The change proposed by Cyril in sftp is a very pragmatic approach to
> > deal with parallelism at the file transfer level. It leverages the
> > already existing sftp protocol and its capability to write/read file
> > content at specified offsets. This enables
2010 Apr 11
2
Yum/WGET/HTTP sourceforge etc.
...so visiting the pptp web site from Firefox times out on certain pages.
I originally thought it was some problem with the pptp site, but I notice that log into hotmail.com
does the same thin (fine on other operating systems). A view with Wireshark on the wget (pptp)
shows the my machine receiving a reassembled TCPPDU from 216.34.181.96 (Sourceforge), sending an ack, receiving a
reassembled PDU, sending an ack, receiving, sending followed by the 5 minutes or whatever of nothing. Then sourceforge
sends an RST and a SYN and the process is repeated.
Here is what I tried. When I put the machine directly on a...
2006 May 23
3
ez-where headscratch
Hi there,
I''m puzzled by this apparently simple query I can''t manage to reassemble
using ez_where plugin.
cond = Caboose::EZ::Condition.new :my_table do
start_on < Time.now
any {end_on > Time.now; end_on.nil?}
end
I keep getting the following result :
>> cond.to_sql
=> ["my_table.start_on < ? AND (my_table.end_on > ?)", Tue May 23