search for: rearanging

...4 73570559 7053364 240043 70119 Y3 Laboratory I want to put all the rows containing Y1 into a subset. I tried this but it does not work sub <- subset(Claims, Year=Y1) I would greatly appreciate any help Kevin -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Rearanging-Data-tp4371717p4371717.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ??????????? URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20100209/db12d14b/attachment.pl>

Hi all, First of all, thanks to Speex developper for the all the job. I am trying to implement my own Speex DirectShow fitlers for VoIP following the documentation and sample code's. I am facing audio glitches when encoding - decoding PCM data. The encoder and decoder procedures are copied below. What about the lookahead size ? how shouw we apply it in encoding stage ? thanks in advance

Hey Cats, I''m having a problem. I''m working with an object that contains a bunch of arrays: var myObject = { "data": [ {"line": [1,"aoo","far"]}, {"line": [2,"boo","ear"]}, {"line": [3,"coo","dar"]}, {"line":

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 02:52 +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > I've taken a look at the virtion-mmio spec, and it looks fairly > reasonable. > > The only thing I'd change is the GuestPageSize/QueuePFN mess. Seems like just > using straight 64-bit addresses would be a better solution. Maybe split into > a high/low pair to keep all registers as 32-bit registers. This can be

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 02:52 +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > I've taken a look at the virtion-mmio spec, and it looks fairly > reasonable. > > The only thing I'd change is the GuestPageSize/QueuePFN mess. Seems like just > using straight 64-bit addresses would be a better solution. Maybe split into > a high/low pair to keep all registers as 32-bit registers. This can be

In order not to have more items in the BUGS list than necessary, I've gone through the list of open bugs and removed some of them for reasons given below: (Note that nothing really dies on R-bugs it just moves into trashcan, wishlist, or Something-fixed, so if you complain loudly enough they can be picked up again.) *Graphics* Remove three reports on panel.first() (2 + 1 answer with a

Dear R-help, I'm using prop.test() to compute a confidence interval for a proportion under R version 2.4.1, as in: prop.test(x = 340, n = 400)$conf [1] 0.8103309 0.8827749 I have two questions: 1) from the source code my understanding is that the confidence interval is computed according to Wilson, E.B. (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J. Am.

Dear All, am new to xen and recently implemented it. i had some issues initially but googling arround and some wise replies from you guys out there managed to clear them. now I have 2 virtual machines on my xen domains one is windows 2003 and other windows2008 both the virtual machines were working fine for about a week jus 2 days back we had a change in our network . i mean we rearanged the

Hi all, The problem I have been experiencing since last month is that some of my customers are getting calls with "Asterisk <Unknown>" caller id. Most of them in the middle of the night. And my asterisk server has no record of these calls. The customers were getting irritated as you can imagine. I guessed the only way to receive incoming calls by by-passing the registration server

I'm looking for some info on the Asterisk Appliance. I understand it has a gui, but can I still do all the dialplan config that I'm used of doing by hand outside of the gui? If I really wanted to, could I even ignore that the device has a gui and do all my config in the files? I guess I'm just wondering if it will be as flexible as a 'vanilla' asterisk install from source on a

This is only partly a question about R, as I am not quite sure about the underlying statistical theory either. I have fitted a non-linear mixed-effects model with nlme. In the fixed part of the model I have a factor with three levels as explanatory variable. I would like to use Tukey HSD or a similar test to test for differences between these three levels. I have two grouping factors:

...freq-next' into linux-next git bisect good 11ec23f2c0874676a3321d304d2a03e2c46dc680 # 23:13 20+ 4 Merge 'shawnguo/for-next' into devel-inn-x86_64-201310190634 git bisect good e358784297992b012e8071764d996191dd2b1a54 # 00:19 20+ 1 can: flexcan: fix mx28 detection by rearanging OF match table git bisect bad 2b13d06c9584b4eb773f1e80bbaedab9a1c344e1 # 00:35 0- 6 wanxl: fix info leak in ioctl git bisect good 725907827a7f46dfb5df6e4f3d8f9bcbc9903877 # 01:29 20+ 2 Merge branch 'sctp_csum' git bisect bad ce97fef4235378108ed3bd96e1b3eab8fd0a1fbd...

...freq-next' into linux-next git bisect good 11ec23f2c0874676a3321d304d2a03e2c46dc680 # 23:13 20+ 4 Merge 'shawnguo/for-next' into devel-inn-x86_64-201310190634 git bisect good e358784297992b012e8071764d996191dd2b1a54 # 00:19 20+ 1 can: flexcan: fix mx28 detection by rearanging OF match table git bisect bad 2b13d06c9584b4eb773f1e80bbaedab9a1c344e1 # 00:35 0- 6 wanxl: fix info leak in ioctl git bisect good 725907827a7f46dfb5df6e4f3d8f9bcbc9903877 # 01:29 20+ 2 Merge branch 'sctp_csum' git bisect bad ce97fef4235378108ed3bd96e1b3eab8fd0a1fbd...