search for: realservers

I now this may be a touchy subject, but I'll preface by saying that I'm trying to get away from Real Networks. Now that video is becoming a reality with Icecast, I want to make a slow transition from using RealServer to using Icecast. I have 20GBs of video content in Real format so I need to keep using the RealServer, but I want to start running the live audio stream with Icecast. Has

...e host src 127.0.0.1 Once i do that, i can no longer ping 66.33.206.41. (I can before i make the change, and if i move the route back to the local table. I also verified that the 100 rule wasn''t to blame.) Is this destined to not work? My end goal with this is to allow monitoring of realservers on a linux virtual server director box. With the TUN or DR directing mechanisms, the service IP is configured on the director box AND on the realservers, but only the director responds to arp requests and gets the router traffic. It decides where packets should go and either rewrites the mac addre...

...ternal lan | eth2 LVS-NAT setup With LVS setup as LVS-NAT, everything works a treat as in load balancing from the internet is spread across my 2 servers that are connected to eth2. LVS seems to handling the NAT/masq just nicely, and plays nice with shorewall via using fwmark. BUT, my "realservers" (192.168.1.x connected via eth2) can''t access anything externally say dns lookups, routing mail, whatever, ie anything originating from the box apart from web traffic which LVS-NAT is handling. (which I figured is right, but I don''t know how to "fix" it so they can...

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 21:58, Erlend Simonsen wrote: > Hirendra Hindocha <hiren_hindocha@comcast.net> writes: > >> > >> > >> No. icecast2 is a streaming server, so it... streams. > >> > > > > Good point. I wonder how the other servers (Real Server ,Quicktime etc) do it. > > Any inputs on any other streaming servers that lets a

They don't care what serves it - Icecast is legally equivalent to Realserver. -----Original Message----- From: Maarten Stolte To: icecast@xiph.org Sent: 1/15/2002 3:10 AM Subject: [icecast] Record companies etc. and their view of Icecast. Hello, we've been testing Icecast2 with a jukebox like application, and I am wondering how recording companies view these streams. We already have

Hi Guys, Here is the setup. LVS NAT cluster with director (dir), backup director (bdir), and two realservers (rs1 and rs2) running apache webserver. SSH DSA key-based authentication set up between rs1 and rs2 in order to facilitate automated (via cron) mirorring of htdocs directories. All works fine untill I decide to host DNS on the same cluster. As soon as I start BIND on rs1, ssh no longer works to thi...

Hi! Anyone out there that has allready written an Ogg fileformat plug for RealServers and players? Regards, Mark -- Mark de Bokx - Application Engineer Cistron Internet Services P.O. Box 297, NL-2400 AG, Alphen a/d Rijn 06-17948710 "I Refuse To Have A Battle Of Wits With An Unarmed Person." --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project home...

Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean). So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn't appear in the ipvsadm output. So I stopped and restarted Pulse. And now *none* of the

Hello, I''m used to using Xen in a bridge mode where my dom0 and all domUs are on the same layer 2 network. However now I have to set up a server whose eth0 is on one network and the domUs will be on another /29. So, for example, if the eth0 of dom0 is 192.168.1.214/24, then I have 10.1.1.0/29 (10.1.1.0 -> 10.1.1.7) routed to it for use in domUs, how would I go about setting that up?

> Given my experience of running multiple streams on an > old 486, I'd say you will run out of bandwidth before you > overpower the server. Bandwidth is indeed the biggest resources. We used dual CPU p3-600's at icast. We had 4 machines and we built it to easily handle 12,000 listeners over 500 streams. Only 3 were active at any one time ( the 4th was failover ). CPU load

After reading through an older thread on this list (streaming ogg audio), I was wondering if would be possible in the future to use OggVorbis and Icecast as a replacement for RealAudio and RealServer. By this I'm not talking about simple live http/tcp streaming, but on-demand rtsp/udp streaming where a user could open a player and instantly jump to a location in a file, or click a link in a

Hello, I suggest Darwin Steraming Server. Apple's Darwin Streaming Video Server is pretty good and open source...(It uses RTSP protocol and supports Linux,Mac,Windows) RealServer is not free(there is connection and year limitations....) but powerfull..(uses RTSP, supports Linux, Windows[memory eater :)) ]) Also there is Windows Media(uses HTTP(performance is very bad), supports only

You know winamp does support seeking on HTTP connections via the Range: header, of course it relies on the client figuring out how the byte offset corresponds to the time offset, which is easy for CBR files, but not for VBR files. And winamp sometimes gets confused with some streaming servers and keeps trying to seek when it doesn't need to. <p>> > No, they do it using RTSP

Is it possible? For LVS you have to deal with something called the ARP problem (viz., the realservers should not respond to ARP requests for the hardware address associated with the virtual IP). This is solved with some sysctl stuff for kernel 2.2.x and for 2.4.26+, but of course CentOS 3 is 2.4.21. There's a kernel module "noarp" that's suppoed to work for all 2.4.x kernels but...

...> -i having a rule in my ipchains table like that: # ipchains -A input -p http -s <client-IP> -m 1 and setting up a CBQ filter # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 100:0 prio 100 handle 100 fw classid 100:100 the VS-director passes only the specified maximum of traffic to the realservers this is exactly what I´ve been looking for thanks to everybody supporting me here as well cheers, Joern Maier

Rob Burris wrote: > Real Networks offers a free streamer called Real Server. I'm not sure of the > exact link, but here's a starting point That is definitely not free, it's not even zero cost after that evaluation year. There don't even exist any players for it except from Real ... i can't think of anything less free than that. :| I suggest ditching all that crap and to

On 8 Mar 2004 at 14:30, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 02:23, Michael Smith wrote: > > Shoutcast just does user-agent sniffing. This makes it look like you > > can't download the stream easily, but that's just misleading you - > > it's completely trivial to do so. > > Yes , i'd say the same. > > > > The most clean

Hello, Sorry but in the mails I have read I did not see any "shout" program comments. I have configured icecast and I am using "shout" to encode MP3s. Is the performance of shout bad or others are better then "shout"? I did not encounter any problems yet. Thank you for any comment. Tamer Demir At 12:10 15.01.2002 +0100, Maarten Stolte wrote: >Hello, >

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:16:53PM +1000, Michael Smith wrote: > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 04:35, Hirendra Hindocha wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have an icecast2 server streaming some mp3 files and am using > > winamp to listen to the stream, however I couldn't figure out if > > there is a way to seek or rewind. Is there a way to seek/fast > >

I've been testing DFS roots and I'm finding that while Vista and 2008 Server clients can connect with no problems, Windows XP Pro and 2003 Server clients fail. This seems like it's the wrong way round - Samba usually has more difficulties with recent Windows versions than older ones - but I can only assume that there's some registry/policy change between the versions. If anybody