search for: realesed

Hi to all, I've just started to see that Asterisk-gui from Digium. Does anybody know, when the first official-realese will be released? Thanks to all -- .:FaberK:. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071012/09197260/attachment.htm

...that you can't assume the datas to be read are byte aligned. However, I noticed that some data are always byte aligned. Is it normal or just it is just my sample video? being able to assume so would provide a big boost. -What should I do with my version in more of putting the sources with our realesed games? I'd love to share my work on theora, but my version so far is somehow broken : I didn't wrote the Big Endian counterpart of my functions, I replaced the assembly language (I read somewhere this is plain wrong with theora guidelines). What should be the best way to make my PC/Visua St...

Hello Mehdi, Thank you for bringing this to our awareness. I've been looking into the 3.8 release of LLVM. Would you happen to know if r269096 was part of this realese? lli running on my system is capable of handling unnamed global variables, so I'd imagine so. u at x1 ~> lli -version LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 3.8.0 Optimized build. Built May 7 2016

Before I "reinvent-the-wheel", does any one know of PHP based interface to the CDR table? If not, I will get started writing one. Thanks, Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030624/d4cb6911/attachment.htm

I think this feature may be realesed more easly(because wine get all 3d-calls) than other programs like vrizer (now vrizer is dead).

> On May 25, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 25 May 2016 at 16:10, Robin Eklind via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> declare void @foo() unnamed_addr >> global i32 42 > > Doesn't a global have to be named? The syntax in the IR reference > doesn't make it optional: To be

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: serious Tags: patch On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this: # apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23% Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de

I see this has now been released :) What is the best way to upgrade both the Dom-0 and Dom-U to Xen 3.2 within CentOS 5.2 ? Regards, -- --[ UxBoD ]-- // PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84 // Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: