search for: rcompatibility

I should have saved the messages about this but I didn't. Can someone remind me of what function or object to check from within a function to determine if you are running R? I need to make some changes in code according to whether I am running it under R or under S and I would prefer to keep one source tree. Thomas Lumley: I read your web page on porting S code to R. It looks very good.

From: marketing@insightful.com Reply-to: betazone@insightful.com Subject: S-PLUS 8 Beta Program Time to go out: As soon as possible Dear R-help readers, As Insightful announced at the DSC2005 meeting in Seattle, the next release of S-PLUS will introduce a new package system. Our goal is to provide package authors the means to create cutting-edge statistical methods currently available either

[Sorry about the duplicate posting; this one comes from the correct address. Please respond to me with any questions about this -- David.] Dear R-help readers, As Insightful announced at the DSC2005 meeting in Seattle, the next release of S-PLUS will introduce a new package system. Our goal is to provide package authors the means to create cutting-edge statistical methods currently available

Pat Burns makes a good point. -Peter -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [R] Using seq_len() vs 1:n Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:01:20 +0000 From: Patrick Burns <pburns at pburns.seanet.com> To: Peter Ehlers <ehlers at ucalgary.ca> References: <4B746AEF.10900 at ucalgary.ca> If you want your code to be compatible with S+, then 'seq_len' isn't going to work.