search for: rayvd

...ntos.org. I'm interested in adding content periodically throughout wiki.centos; most likely in the HOWTO areas, but am happy to do reorganization and cleanup as-needed. On the projects side I'd like to create a project for the i586 on CentOS 5 section. Thanks, Ray -- Ray Van Dolson <rayvd at bludgeon.org> GPG Fingerprint: 175B D779 4BC9 D5FF 5CC9 CE79 BCB4 0703 B51E 9F1A

Hi all; I have a custom iproute2 table and a few rules to go along with it (CentOS 5) -- I have added the table to /etc/iproute2/rt_tables. if-up and friends doesn't seem to handle this real gracefully. How are those of you out there doing something similar managing this customization? I don't really want to muck with /etc/init.d/network or the if-up scripts to avoid breaking upgrades.

Anyone know off the top of their heads if this (AT-2972SX) fiber network card will work out of the box with CentOS 6.x? Sounds like it's a Broadcom-based card, so perhaps it will, or maybe something exists for it in elrepo? Hoping to avoid needing to build custom drivers from source. Ray

Greetings - I had a logical volume that was running out of space on a virtual machine. I successfully expanded the LV using lvextend, and lvdisplay shows that it has been expanded. Then I went to expand the filesystem to fill the new space (# resize2fs -p /dev/vde1) and I get the results that the filesystem is already xx blocks long, nothing to do. If I do a # df -h, I can see that the

...network. I'm hoping to get all SIP clients (PAP2-NA's) to register at the central Asterisk server so I can avoid setting up a whole bunch of Asterisk servers within each private network. Here is a generalized diagram of how I hope things could be layed out: http://webdev.digitalpath.net/~rayvd/voice/voice-network.png I figure if the load on our main Asterisk servers gets too high it would be fairly trivial to add additional servers to cope with this. I'm trying to figure out what options I have for "proxying" the connections from the PAP2-NA's directly to the central...

On a custom compiled Linux 2.6.13 kernel... # tc qdisc add dev ppp145 handle ffff: ingress # tc filter add dev ppp145 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 384kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument This works fine on a CentOS machine and my Fedora Core 2 box with default kernel. I''m trying to figure out what is missing in the

Greetings. I am trying to create a 10TB (approx) ext3 filesystem. I am able to successfully create the partition using parted, but when I try to use mkfs.ext3, I get an error stating there is an 8TB limit for ext3 filesystems. I looked at the specs for 5 on the "upstream" vendor's website, and they indicate that there is a 16TB limit on ext3. Has anyone been able to create

I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6.

Does anyone know how to submit wishes to the EPEL Wishlist here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/WishList It reads "Immutable Page". They say: "Please add packages that are part of Fedora but lack a EPEL maintainer to this list", but there is no way to do that! They don't say if "Packages part of Fedora" means "Core" or it can be Extras too, but

Does anyone have any recommendations for network monitoring systems that work with CentOS 3 or 4? thanks

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:51:58AM -0700, Chuck Munro wrote: > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what > is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with > the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, > political, etc? > > Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few > more stable

We have a small app that runs asterisk -rx "sip show peers" (etc) and gathers some info and reports it back somewhere else. This is called from a cron job essentially and doesn't really run all that often (once a minute). We noticed some gaps in the results we were getting and dug in a little further. We found that if you run asterisk -rx "sip show peers" from the

Disclaimer: Yes, I know faxing over G711 is unreliable. :-) We're running Asterisk 1.0.9 which talks to a Audiocodes SIP Gateway. We're running Sipura SPA-2002's as ATA's and faxing within our own voice network is working. If we try and fax out to the world however, we're running into a problem. When the call connects and the modem tones begin to negotiate, our SIP/PSTN

I've been having problems getting MusicOnHold to work, so I've dumbed down my setup to as simple of a setup as I can. Asterisk 1.0.9. SIP ATA's (Sipura SPA-2002's) <SIP ATA 1> <---> <Asterisk> <---> <SIP ATA 2> Both ATA's have public IP's. No NAT'ing going on here. Reinvites are allowed so the media stream bypases Asterisk once a call

When qualify is set to yes in sip.conf for a "friend" and the OPTIONS packet gets returned with an ICMP port unreachable message, what is the behavior of Asterisk? It looks to me like Asterisk tries sending the OPTION request again right away (well within a second or two). Some of our devices are being Linux firewalls that make use of iptables to do portforwarding. This generates

I'm running into an issue where subscribers to our service cannot call certain 1-800 numbers if they have a caller id blocked account (restrictcid=yes). This is on Asterisk 1.0.9 and our clients are using Sipura SPA-2002's. Our provider uses a SIP/PSTN gateway, so we hand off SIP to them from Asterisk. The problem appears to be that when an "Anonymous" call goes out, there is

I'm trying to figure out how Asterisk decides how often it will send SIP NOTIFY's to an ATA when a voicemail message is waiting for the user on the server. >From watching, it seems to be completely random. Sometimes 10 seconds apart, then 33 seconds, then 13 seconds, etc. Each time causes a "ring" on the ATA. I can change the ATA's behavior, but what I'd really

Hey all... not exactly an SELinux veteran, but am trying to work through some issues. Specifically, setting up a simple Samba configuration on a CentOS 5 machine. Determined I needed to do setsebool -P samba_enable_home_dirs 1 In order to get access to home directory shares working correctly. Fine; this is documented in samba_selinux(8). However, I still see the following in my

Hi all. Decided to upgrade an old Slackware 10 box I had. The box is running a VIA C3 processor and apparently doesn't support the cmov extension that most i686 processors do. As a result I cannot install CentOS 5. I discovered a few posts from way back in April: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-April/079352.html

First off; are there any storage-centric mailing lists that target Linux specifically? Secondly, I'm wondering if there's anything in the works or already out there similar to Sun's L2ARC[1] for ZFS. Basically this is a filesystem (or maybe lower-level) cache for reads, writes that can be comprised of faster media like SSD. I think it could make SATA-based JBOD solutions a lot more