search for: rawdod

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:56 PM, David Richards <rawdod at gmail.com> wrote: > Its really sad to hear thats happening but even more sad is the fact > that flac is becoming a very common format for music on the interweb > whilst at the same time the development has ceased. I've found some > severe issues with OggFLAC that essentially m...

...flac encoding, and I even added support for 24bit flac. I'm probably the only guy in the universe listening to streaming 24bit audio, but if anyone wants to join me the code is located here: https://github.com/oneman/edcast2_jack Cheers, -D On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:19 PM, David Richards <rawdod at gmail.com> wrote: > I might be able to look into this soon, I actually got my mother a > squeezebox boom for xmas, but I have no experience with the device, > other than initial set up and hearing it go. My choice of the word > "useless" was deliberate to get folks rawle...

...in the encoding and decoding side of things, and also in the ogg packaging layer. All of this is related to periods of silence in the stream of sound. -D On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:56 PM, David Richards <rawdod at gmail.com> wrote: >> Its really sad to hear thats happening but even more sad is the fact >> that flac is becoming a very common format for music on the interweb >> whilst at the same time the development has ceased. I've found some >> severe issues with OggFLAC th...

Hi folks! Due to the fact that more and more users increasingly use MP3 < 320kbps as their source for encoding music, and publish it as flac files, I suggest that something is done in the flac encoder to possible avoid this. My idea is kinda easy/stupid, but might work; Implement a function that use a FFT to check if the input has frequencies > 16kHz, and informs the user that the file

Its really sad to hear thats happening but even more sad is the fact that flac is becoming a very common format for music on the interweb whilst at the same time the development has ceased. I've found some severe issues with OggFLAC that essentially make it a useless format for streaming, no one cared. -David Listener of many flacs On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:42 PM, J?rgen Vigdal <jorgen

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <tor-einar at jarnbjo.name> wrote: > Am 07.01.2011 23:38, schrieb David Richards: >> >> I'm also interested in another concept of lossless streaming with >> flac. Lets call it broadcast flac. A problem with streaming for long >> periods of time is that the sending and receiving computers clocks go >> out

The actual non made up number for 44100 is 23 seconds. :D 4096 samples, 254 packets in an ogg page. -David On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Ben Allison <benski at winamp.com> wrote: > The main problem is in the Ogg layer, in my opinion. > > Imagine this extreme use-case with __completely made up__ numbers. ?This > is a scenario where the server is encoding to FLAC on-the-fly

Not that many people are streaming FLAC, and if they are, they are, in my mind, undoubtedly experiencing problems. Probably the most prized kind of software problem of all, the intermittent kind. I am streaming FLAC. 24bit no less, and its fantastic. The future I would like to live in, is one where lossless music is streamed and heard by people other than myself. It is generally not possible to

I for one am not worried about getting mp3 encoded stuff in my flac files, but I want to respond about "legitimate" OggFLAC. OggFLAC as a format for files, I agree, used by no one. However, I don't know of any other open source way to stream lossless audio. Maybe I did not look hard enough. Certainly nothing I can think of that would hope to be compatible with standard media player

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Brian Willoughby <brianw at sounds.wa.com> wrote: > This thread has raised several good topics. ?It's surprising that the > FLAC-Dev list has been silent for years, and now suddenly there are several > good ideas to discuss. I'll take credit for this, toot toot toot :D > > On Jan 7, 2011, at 15:04, David Richards wrote: >>