search for: ratification

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "ratification".

Did you mean: gratification
2020 Jan 23
2
[RFC] Upstream development of support for yet-to-be-ratified RISC-V extensions
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 19:55, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Alex Bradbury <asb at lowrisc.org> wrote: > >> This all makes sense to me. > > > > That's correct, thanks for the feedback. > > > > I do like the idea from James of having the compiler always spit out a > > note
2009 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] patch for portability
...participate in overload resolution unless U is implicitly convertible to T1 and V is implicitly convertible to T2 (easily implemented with enable_if and is_convertible). pair is still a hotbed of controversy on the committee, but I expect it to be greatly simplified over its current form prior to ratification. -Howard
2009 Dec 03
3
[LLVMdev] patch for portability
Sorry, always end up not replying to the list: The main issue with dealing with next this way is that people adding new uses of next will probably not be using c++0x and therefore won't know it's ambiguous and that it needs to be qualified. There are also two issues with rvalue references and the STL: 1. EquivalenceClasses, in the insert and findLeader functions, it uses map functions
2018 Mar 11
3
Squid vs. iptables redirection: exception for certain domains ?
Am 11.03.2018 um 11:53 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: > > I've experimented some more, and I have a partial success. Here, I'm > redirecting all HTTPS traffic *except* the one that goes to my bank: > > iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $IFACE_LAN -p tcp ! -d > www.credit-cooperatif.coop --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3129 > > This works
2018 Mar 11
0
Squid vs. iptables redirection: exception for certain domains ?
Le 11/03/2018 ? 13:09, Leon Fauster a ?crit?: > It is not a good practice to place domain names into iptables rules. Define > a custom table, place this table into your rule list (to stick at the right > place) and feed that table with the resolved domain names. This can be altered > while running in the case of changes (check resolving results periodically). I admit I've never
2018 Mar 12
1
Squid vs. iptables redirection: exception for certain domains ?
Hi, Another idea - but this gets complicated and with that, prone to faults - use a simple shell script to resolve the desired domains and keep their IPs in an ipset, then use the ipset in your firewall rules, this way you can keep your iptables rules static, your squid config static and simply add or remove IPs from the ipset. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux!
2019 Nov 15
17
[RFC] LLVM Security Group and Process
Hello compiler enthusiasts, The Apple LLVM team would like to propose that a new a security process and an associated private LLVM Security Group be created under the umbrella of the LLVM project. A draft proposal for how we could organize such a group and what its process could be is available on Phabricator <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70326>. The proposal starts with a list of goals for