search for: raise

...tml. Thanks for the many many people who provided ideas and feedback for this! With there now being a description of what is expected during bug triaging (http://llvm.org/docs/BugLifeCycle.html#triaging-bugs), we're looking for more volunteers to actually do the bug triaging. About half of all raised bugs currently don’t seem to get triaged. The idea is to have one or more volunteers for each of the well over 100 different product/component combinations we have in bugzilla. If you volunteer to help with triaging bugs against a specific component, we’ll add you to the default cc list for that...

...s I’ve heard a number of different options, ranging over: * Just make a component for every sub-directory in the source code. * Just make a component for every library that gets build in the LLVM build. * Make components so that each component has a significant enough number of issues raised against it (I’m trying to paraphrase what you’re proposing below). In my mind, the guiding principle should be: * Components should reflect an area of expertise, so that each component can have a set of recognised people that can triage and/or fix bugs against that component. If we’d follow...

...s I’ve heard a number of different options, ranging over: * Just make a component for every sub-directory in the source code. * Just make a component for every library that gets build in the LLVM build. * Make components so that each component has a significant enough number of issues raised against it (I’m trying to paraphrase what you’re proposing below). In my mind, the guiding principle should be: * Components should reflect an area of expertise, so that each component can have a set of recognised people that can triage and/or fix bugs against that component. If we’d follow...

...> - Just make a component for every sub-directory in the source code. >>> - Just make a component for every library that gets build in the >>> LLVM build. >>> - Make components so that each component has a significant enough >>> number of issues raised against it (I’m trying to paraphrase what you’re >>> proposing below). >>> >>> >>> In my mind, the guiding principle should be: >>> >>> - Components should reflect an area of expertise, so that each >>> component can have a se...

...dvance, Blake describe VenuesController, "on update" do before(:each) do @venue = mock("venue") @venue.stub!(:new_record?).and_return(false) @venue.stub!(:to_param).and_return(''1'') controller.class.send(:define_method, :rescue_action) { |e| raise e } end it "should raise an error if record is invalid" do stub_authorized_login Venue.should_receive(:find).and_return(@venue) @venue.should_receive(:update_attributes!).with("name" => "random text").and_return(false) lambda {post :create, {:ve...

On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 07:34 +0530, Anantha Raghava H A via samba wrote: > Hi, > > We have a test environment with Samba Version 4.18.5 which is set to > Forest, Domain and lowest function Level of 2008 R2. I am trying to > raise the forest and domain levels. > > However, when I try to raise the domain level, I get an error - > "ERROR: > Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function level > of > a DC!" and when I try to raise the forest level I get an error - > "Fo...

Hi, We have a test environment with Samba Version 4.18.5 which is set to Forest, Domain and lowest function Level of 2008 R2. I am trying to raise the forest and domain levels. However, when I try to raise the domain level, I get an error - "ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function level of a DC!" and when I try to raise the forest level I get an error - "Forest function level can't be h...

Hi, Setting up a test environment for 4.19 rc2. However, can't we raise the lowest functional level higher than 2008 R2 in 4.18.x? Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava H A DISCLAIMER: This e-mail communication and any attachments may be privileged and confidential to Exzatech Consulting And Services Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, and are intended only for the use of the...

...cha-0.4.0 had been released and that we can now do the object.stubs(:method).returns (:first_value, :second_value). Much neater than fiddling with lambdas everytime this sort of behaviour is needed But can we go further ? I was writing a test today and I wanted the first call to a method to raise an exception and the next call to return a value (I was testing a method on an ActiveRecord object where if save! raises StaleObjectError then we reload and retry in the proper way, the second call to save! shouldn''t raise.). The same basic method works: lambdas = [lambda {raise ...

...n email is sent using the EmailOutputter. I know changed the EmailOutputter to include a global var in the subject (MDC) since the subject is normally static. I want to set this var to the exception message, so it is sent as the subject. Can anyone tell me how to do this in rails? Basically: raise e or some other cause > -> Log4r::MDC.put(''subject'', e.message) > continue with the exception I found *rescue_from* but it just gives it to the handler and then stops. Thanks a lot, Christoph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group...

Hi, I''m trying to use dtrace to signal threads in my app when certain events happen, and the raise() action seemed adequate -- looking at the kernel sources, it sends a signal to the currently executing thread, and a quick microbenchmark confirmed this. However, further testing showed that if lots of threads hit the event simultaneously, the signal only gets delivered once, and may also get deli...

Hi. We are using samba4 as our production AD for a while in a mixed (XP, win2k3, win7, win2k8) environment. This post: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2011-February/076525.html mentions that to raise the functional level one should use this command: samba-tool domainl evel raise --domain=2008 --forest=2008 but in our current git version this command doesn't work due to the fact that there is no --domain switch as shown below: # samba-tool domain level --help Usage: samba-tool domain lev...

Was hoping it might get some help or a better explanation of this: /ADT/APInt.h:1217: uint64_t llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const: Assertion `getActiveBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for uint64_t"' failed. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007ffff6eb4d05 in raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 64 ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory. in ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff6eb4d05 in raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #1 0x00007ffff6eb8ab6 in abo...

G'day All, We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2. I am referencing: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was 2003. However, when...

With : PostgreSQL 8.4 or postgresql-8.3 rails 2.3.4 pg 9.x or pg 8.x I test this code: ========================= class NkiBatch < ActiveRecord::Base Bank.connection.transaction do bank = Bank.new(:name => "ddsjdsjdsjk") bank.save! raise ActiveRecord::Rollback.new end end and this: ========================= class NkiBatch < ActiveRecord::Base Bank.connection.transaction do bank = Bank.new(:name => "ddsjdsjdsjk") bank.save! raise Exception.new end end and this: =======================...

...my DC debian 12 to samba 4.19rc2 from mjt repository and I tried to increase feature level of domain but failed. First 2 commands was ok: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 samba-tool domain functionalprep --function-level=2016 the third instead failed: > samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2016 --forest-level=2016 > ERROR(<class 'AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - 'NoneType' > object has no attribute 'startswith' > ? File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line > 279, in _run > ??? re...

...e/development - Charles Begin forwarded message: > From: george2 <notifications at github.com> > Subject: [nut] PyNUT: Fix error when raising without an Exception. (#128) > Date: June 3, 2014 3:34:00 PM EDT > Raising without a valid exception is invalid: > > >>> raise > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > TypeError: exceptions must be old-style classes or derived from BaseException, not NoneType > >>> raise Exception > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<s...

...er] task dispatch:host.get_other_config D:c813aaba73c4 created by task D:db9f2e113fee [20120403T07:57:54.071Z|debug|hyperion|549 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi||http_critical] Premature termination of connection! [20120403T07:57:54.109Z|debug|hyperion|546 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|sm_exec D:6ec167aaa83d|xapi] Raised at sm_exec.ml:220.7-69 -> pervasiveext.ml:22.2-9 [20120403T07:57:54.109Z| info|hyperion|546 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|sm_exec D:6ec167aaa83d|xapi] Session.destroy trackid=654ed4437d52fe9cdd8e5d98a5955526 [20120403T07:57:54.110Z|debug|hyperion|546 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|sm_exec D:6ec167aaa83d|backt...

...? Regards. Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:2672 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 event Alarm Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3091 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 Alarm masks 0x0000 0x0004 Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3096 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 Alarm No Alarm raised, Yellow Alarm cleared Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:2672 handle_uc_event: Unicall/6 event Alarm Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3091 handle_uc_event: Unicall/6 Alarm masks 0x0000 0x0004 Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3096 handle_uc_event: Unicall/6 Alar...

Hello, Is anyone else having trouble with the and_raise method on mocks, with respect to shared behaviors? If I do the following instead: foo.should_receive(:bar).and_return { raise } everything seems to work. I have been supplying no arguments to and_raise, by the way. Also, you may want to make the background in the code examples on the home page...