search for: raised

...tml. Thanks for the many many people who provided ideas and feedback for this! With there now being a description of what is expected during bug triaging (http://llvm.org/docs/BugLifeCycle.html#triaging-bugs), we're looking for more volunteers to actually do the bug triaging. About half of all raised bugs currently don’t seem to get triaged. The idea is to have one or more volunteers for each of the well over 100 different product/component combinations we have in bugzilla. If you volunteer to help with triaging bugs against a specific component, we’ll add you to the default cc list for that c...

...s I’ve heard a number of different options, ranging over: * Just make a component for every sub-directory in the source code. * Just make a component for every library that gets build in the LLVM build. * Make components so that each component has a significant enough number of issues raised against it (I’m trying to paraphrase what you’re proposing below). In my mind, the guiding principle should be: * Components should reflect an area of expertise, so that each component can have a set of recognised people that can triage and/or fix bugs against that component. If we’d follow...

...s I’ve heard a number of different options, ranging over: * Just make a component for every sub-directory in the source code. * Just make a component for every library that gets build in the LLVM build. * Make components so that each component has a significant enough number of issues raised against it (I’m trying to paraphrase what you’re proposing below). In my mind, the guiding principle should be: * Components should reflect an area of expertise, so that each component can have a set of recognised people that can triage and/or fix bugs against that component. If we’d follow...

...> - Just make a component for every sub-directory in the source code. >>> - Just make a component for every library that gets build in the >>> LLVM build. >>> - Make components so that each component has a significant enough >>> number of issues raised against it (I’m trying to paraphrase what you’re >>> proposing below). >>> >>> >>> In my mind, the guiding principle should be: >>> >>> - Components should reflect an area of expertise, so that each >>> component can have a set...

...1) ''VenuesController on update should raise an error if record is invalid'' FAILED expected ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid, got # 2) ''VenuesController on create should raise an error if record is invalid'' FAILED expected ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid but nothing was raised _________________________________________________________________ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger? http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline

On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 07:34 +0530, Anantha Raghava H A via samba wrote: > Hi, > > We have a test environment with Samba Version 4.18.5 which is set to > Forest, Domain and lowest function Level of 2008 R2. I am trying to > raise the forest and domain levels. > > However, when I try to raise the domain level, I get an error - > "ERROR: > Domain function level

Hi, We have a test environment with Samba Version 4.18.5 which is set to Forest, Domain and lowest function Level of 2008 R2. I am trying to raise the forest and domain levels. However, when I try to raise the domain level, I get an error - "ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function level of a DC!" and when I try to raise the forest level I get an

Hi, Setting up a test environment for 4.19 rc2. However, can't we raise the lowest functional level higher than 2008 R2 in 4.18.x? Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava H A DISCLAIMER: This e-mail communication and any attachments may be privileged and confidential to Exzatech Consulting And Services Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, and are intended only for the use of the recipients named above

First off, I love mocha and have been using it all over the place ever since I found it a few months ago. So I noticed the other day rather belatedly that mocha-0.4.0 had been released and that we can now do the object.stubs(:method).returns (:first_value, :second_value). Much neater than fiddling with lambdas everytime this sort of behaviour is needed But can we go further ? I was

Hi there, I''m using Log4r in my rails projects. On log.error an email is sent using the EmailOutputter. I know changed the EmailOutputter to include a global var in the subject (MDC) since the subject is normally static. I want to set this var to the exception message, so it is sent as the subject. Can anyone tell me how to do this in rails? Basically: raise e or some other cause

Hi, I''m trying to use dtrace to signal threads in my app when certain events happen, and the raise() action seemed adequate -- looking at the kernel sources, it sends a signal to the currently executing thread, and a quick microbenchmark confirmed this. However, further testing showed that if lots of threads hit the event simultaneously, the signal only gets delivered once, and may also

...RBEROS Use Kerberos --ipaddress=IPADDRESS IP address of server Version Options: --version Display version number and when I'm trying to raise the forest level the tools says that the domain functional level needs to be raised first. What's the proper way of raising the functional level in recent git is ? Regards Arek

Was hoping it might get some help or a better explanation of this: /ADT/APInt.h:1217: uint64_t llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const: Assertion `getActiveBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for uint64_t"' failed. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007ffff6eb4d05 in raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 64

G'day All, We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2. I am referencing: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was 2003. However, when we try to raise further, we are getting what seems to be a

With : PostgreSQL 8.4 or postgresql-8.3 rails 2.3.4 pg 9.x or pg 8.x I test this code: ========================= class NkiBatch < ActiveRecord::Base Bank.connection.transaction do bank = Bank.new(:name => "ddsjdsjdsjk") bank.save! raise ActiveRecord::Rollback.new end end and this: ========================= class NkiBatch < ActiveRecord::Base

Hi, today I updated my DC debian 12 to samba 4.19rc2 from mjt repository and I tried to increase feature level of domain but failed. First 2 commands was ok: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 samba-tool domain functionalprep --function-level=2016 the third instead failed: > samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2016 --forest-level=2016 > ERROR(<class

Hi David, Any thoughts on either this pull request, or #129? https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/128 https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/129 Also note the mention of the new Python module here: https://github.com/george2/python-nut2/tree/development - Charles Begin forwarded message: > From: george2 <notifications at github.com> > Subject: [nut] PyNUT: Fix error

...er] task dispatch:host.get_other_config D:c813aaba73c4 created by task D:db9f2e113fee [20120403T07:57:54.071Z|debug|hyperion|549 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi||http_critical] Premature termination of connection! [20120403T07:57:54.109Z|debug|hyperion|546 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|sm_exec D:6ec167aaa83d|xapi] Raised at sm_exec.ml:220.7-69 -> pervasiveext.ml:22.2-9 [20120403T07:57:54.109Z| info|hyperion|546 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|sm_exec D:6ec167aaa83d|xapi] Session.destroy trackid=654ed4437d52fe9cdd8e5d98a5955526 [20120403T07:57:54.110Z|debug|hyperion|546 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|sm_exec D:6ec167aaa83d|backtr...

...? Regards. Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:2672 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 event Alarm Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3091 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 Alarm masks 0x0000 0x0004 Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3096 handle_uc_event: Unicall/5 Alarm No Alarm raised, Yellow Alarm cleared Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:2672 handle_uc_event: Unicall/6 event Alarm Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3091 handle_uc_event: Unicall/6 Alarm masks 0x0000 0x0004 Mar 27 12:58:24 WARNING[2586]: chan_unicall.c:3096 handle_uc_event: Unicall/6 Alarm...

Hello, Is anyone else having trouble with the and_raise method on mocks, with respect to shared behaviors? If I do the following instead: foo.should_receive(:bar).and_return { raise } everything seems to work. I have been supplying no arguments to and_raise, by the way. Also, you may want to make the background in the code examples on the home page a little lighter. I am hardly able to