search for: rademak

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "rademak".

Did you mean: radek
2010 Mar 02
2
[LLVMdev] problems with <map>...
Hi, I still see problems when std::map's are used. Is this expected or are map's still not supported? Cheers, Fons. -- Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers at cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248 WWW: http://fons.rademakers.org Fax: +41 22 7669640
2008 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] C/C++ interpreter...
...ggest being maintenance). I see there is a libLLVMInterpreter that can interpret the LLVM IR. Could this be used to interpret, or a starting point, to an real interpreter ? Cheers, Fons. -- Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers at cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248 WWW: http://fons.rademakers.org Fax: +41 22 7669640
2009 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Developer meeting videos up
...e future. > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev -- Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers at cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248 WWW: http://fons.rademakers.org Fax: +41 22 7669640
2009 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Developer meeting videos up
On Friday 16 October 2009 02:52, Fons Rademakers wrote: > At CERN we had already a number of people questioning the wisdom of basing > our developments on LLVM as it is perceived as an Apple thing, that could > turn on us at anytime, and this position does not help. Ditto. I've heard this more than once from people here....
2010 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] problems with <map>...
Hi Fons, > I still see problems when std::map's are used. Is this expected or are > map's still not supported? what problems are you referring to? Ciao, Duncan.
2009 Oct 15
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Developer meeting videos up
On Oct 15, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hi, Chris > >> All of the videos are now up on the web page, and most of the slides >> are up (still need to get David's and Evan's slides). Please let me >> know if you hit any problems. > First of all, thanks a lot about all stuff with videos & slides > posting. > > I'm a bit curious:
2009 Oct 15
7
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Developer meeting videos up
Hi, Chris > All of the videos are now up on the web page, and most of the slides > are up (still need to get David's and Evan's slides).  Please let me > know if you hit any problems. First of all, thanks a lot about all stuff with videos & slides posting. I'm a bit curious: is there any reason why are other slides / videos not available (it seems that the ones missing
2009 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Developer meeting videos up
On 10/16/2009 07:36 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Friday 16 October 2009 02:52, Fons Rademakers wrote: > >> At CERN we had already a number of people questioning the wisdom of basing >> our developments on LLVM as it is perceived as an Apple thing, that could >> turn on us at anytime, and this position does not help. > > Ditto. I've heard this more than once...
2004 Oct 27
0
Incorrect disk size
Hi, all I'm running multiple Debian stable/untested (2.2 kernel) with Samba 3 servers, and since about half a year I have a very frustrating problem with all of them: Windows 2000/XP clients report the size of the disks in PB (petabytes), while the largest one is 120GB. This causes a lot of general problems, with some applications reporting "disk full" errors. I have searched