Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "r_pretti".
Did you mean:
r_pretty
2017 Aug 19
1
Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
Yes, they work now.
I mentioned them partly because the commit description said overflow for large n and partly to be considered for regression tests.
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 19/8/17, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
Date: Saturday, 19 August, 2017,
2017 Aug 14
0
Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org>
>>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:11:06 +0000 writes:
>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org>
>>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:11:06 +0000 writes:
> See
2017 Aug 18
1
Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
Examples similar to
pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e9, min.n = 1)
with smaller 'n':
pretty(c(-1,1)*1e304, n = 1e5, min.n = 1)
pretty(c(-1,1)*1e306, n = 1e3, min.n = 1)
A report on 'pretty' when working with integers, similar to what led to change of 'seq' fuzz, is https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15137
--------------------------------------------
On Tue,
2017 Aug 11
2
Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
See https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-August/074746.html for the origin of the example here.
That
pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e9, min.n = 1) gave 20 intervals, far from 1e9, but
pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e6, min.n = 1) gave 1000000 intervals
(on a machine), made me trace through the code to function 'R_pretty' in https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/appl/pretty.c .
*lo is
2007 Jan 30
1
Solaris 10 compilation issue
I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD
hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11.
My config.site looks like this:
#! /bin/sh
AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar"
TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex"
LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex"
PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"
2007 Jan 30
1
Difficulty with compiling R-2.4.1 on solaris 10
I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD
hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11.
My config.site looks like this:
#! /bin/sh
AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar"
TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex"
LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex"
PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"
2007 Jan 30
0
R Compiling issue
I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD
hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11.
My config.site looks like this:
#! /bin/sh
AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar"
TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex"
LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex"
PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"
2007 Jan 30
0
Issue with compiling R on solaris 10
I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD
hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11.
My config.site looks like this:
#! /bin/sh
AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar"
TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex"
LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex"
PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"