Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r81350".
Did you mean:
r71350
2009 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] & Question: Preserving ProfileInfo for backend.
...roximation it could be useful until the proper framework is
> implemented?
Don't know about Passes in the backend, but this could be a problem of
an FunctionPassManager trying to use a ModulePass.
Andi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm-r81350.llc.profile.loader.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090909/12900261/attachment.bin>
2009 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] & Question: Preserving ProfileInfo for backend.
Hi,
Does the current LLVM backend support reading in profile information
(without preserving across transformations)? An earlier poster
http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/4bd65dbe84394bb7
noted that accessing execution counts in a MachineFunction pass (using
the BasicBlock* corresponding to the respective MachineBasicBlock)
returned 0 for all blocks. Running llc with