Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r71350".
Did you mean:
371350
2016 Sep 26
2
Undocumented 'use.names' argument to c()
...n-undocumented-argument/24815653
>> : The code of c() and unlist() was formerly shared but
>> has been (long time passing) separated. From July 30,
>> 1998, is where do_c got split into do_c and do_unlist.
> With the implementation of 'c.Date' in R devel r71350, an
> argument named 'use.names' is included for
> concatenation. So, it doesn't follow the documented
> 'c'. But, 'c.Date' is not explicitly documented in
> Dates.Rd, that has 'c.Date' as an alias.
I do not see any c.Date in R-deve...
2016 Sep 26
0
Undocumented 'use.names' argument to c()
...rgument/24815653
>>> : The code of c() and unlist() was formerly shared but
>>> has been (long time passing) separated. From July 30,
>>> 1998, is where do_c got split into do_c and do_unlist.
>> With the implementation of 'c.Date' in R devel r71350, an
>> argument named 'use.names' is included for
>> concatenation. So, it doesn't follow the documented
>> 'c'. But, 'c.Date' is not explicitly documented in
>> Dates.Rd, that has 'c.Date' as an alias.
> I do not s...
2016 Sep 25
1
Undocumented 'use.names' argument to c()
...questions/24815572/why-does-function-c-accept-an-undocumented-argument/24815653 : The code of c() and unlist() was formerly shared but has been (long time passing) separated. From July 30, 1998, is where do_c got split into do_c and do_unlist.
With the implementation of 'c.Date' in R devel r71350, an argument named 'use.names' is included for concatenation. So, it doesn't follow the documented 'c'. But, 'c.Date' is not explicitly documented in Dates.Rd, that has 'c.Date' as an alias.
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 24/9/16, Martin Mae...