search for: r77727

>>>>> Hugh Parsonage >>>>> on Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:12:43 +1100 writes: > The only observation I can make is that the change to > round() was made in r77727 whereas your R-devel appears to > be r77715 (so would not exhibit the fixed behaviour). My > guess is that there was a perpetual installation failure > after r77715 but that the test folder was still retrieved > and used. > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 19:27, Berwin A...

...ead?as?is,?should?be?treated?as?exact. -?What?counts?is?what?the?exact?result?should?be. ------------ >>>>>?Hugh?Parsonage >>>>>?????on?Sat,?8?Feb?2020?21:12:43?+1100?writes: ????>?The?only?observation?I?can?make?is?that?the?change?to ????>?round()?was?made?in?r77727?whereas?your?R-devel?appears?to ????>?be?r77715?(so?would?not?exhibit?the?fixed?behaviour).??My ????>?guess?is?that?there?was?a?perpetual?installation?failure ????>?after?r77715?but?that?the?test?folder?was?still?retrieved ????>?and?used. ????>?On?Sat,?8?Feb?2020?at?19:27,?Berwin?A...

G'day all, I have daily scripts running to install the patched version of the current R version and the development version of R on my linux box (Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS). The last development version that was successfully compiled and installed was "R Under development (unstable) (2020-01-25 r77715)" on 27 January. Since then the script always fails as a regression test seems to fail.

The only observation I can make is that the change to round() was made in r77727 whereas your R-devel appears to be r77715 (so would not exhibit the fixed behaviour). My guess is that there was a perpetual installation failure after r77715 but that the test folder was still retrieved and used. On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 19:27, Berwin A Turlach <berwin.turlach at gmail.com> w...