search for: r328593

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "r328593".

Did you mean: r328595
2018 Mar 26
2
CodeView layering
...Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? >> > > These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in the > wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or > BinaryFormats seem OK to me. > Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or they can. > > >> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might >> be useful. >> >> Thanks, >> - Dave &g...
2018 Mar 29
2
CodeView layering
...rmat? >>>> >>> >>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or >>> BinaryFormats seem OK to me. >>> >> >> Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if >> someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or >> they can. >> >> >>> >>> >>>> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might >&g...
2018 Mar 29
0
CodeView layering
...d/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat? >>> >> >> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or >> BinaryFormats seem OK to me. >> > > Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if > someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or > they can. > > >> >> >>> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might >>> be useful. >>&g...
2018 Mar 30
0
CodeView layering
...gt;>> >>>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >>>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or >>>> BinaryFormats seem OK to me. >>>> >>> >>> Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if >>> someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or >>> they can. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help...
2018 Mar 22
0
CodeView layering
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:31 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm looking at fixing some layering violations in LLVM & came across a few > in the CodeView handling, specifically: > > lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers > I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably > these things should be
2018 Apr 01
0
CodeView layering
...>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in >>>>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or >>>>> BinaryFormats seem OK to me. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if >>>> someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or >>>> they can. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'm open to ideas & ha...
2018 Mar 21
4
CodeView layering
I'm looking at fixing some layering violations in LLVM & came across a few in the CodeView handling, specifically: lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF features used by MC? include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes