Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "r328593".
Did you mean:
r328595
2018 Mar 26
2
CodeView layering
...Also seems like this could/should/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat?
>>
>
> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in the
> wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or
> BinaryFormats seem OK to me.
>
Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if
someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or
they can.
>
>
>> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might
>> be useful.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Dave
&g...
2018 Mar 29
2
CodeView layering
...rmat?
>>>>
>>>
>>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in
>>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or
>>> BinaryFormats seem OK to me.
>>>
>>
>> Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if
>> someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or
>> they can.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might
>&g...
2018 Mar 29
0
CodeView layering
...d/needs to be sunk into BinaryFormat?
>>>
>>
>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in
>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or
>> BinaryFormats seem OK to me.
>>
>
> Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if
> someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or
> they can.
>
>
>>
>>
>>> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help in any way that might
>>> be useful.
>>&g...
2018 Mar 30
0
CodeView layering
...gt;>>
>>>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in
>>>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or
>>>> BinaryFormats seem OK to me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if
>>> someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or
>>> they can.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm open to ideas & happy to do the work, or help...
2018 Mar 22
0
CodeView layering
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:31 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm looking at fixing some layering violations in LLVM & came across a few
> in the CodeView handling, specifically:
>
> lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers
> I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably
> these things should be
2018 Apr 01
0
CodeView layering
...>> These things are really more PE/PDB related than CodeView. They are in
>>>>> the wrong place. I'd ask Saleem to help find a new home. Object or
>>>>> BinaryFormats seem OK to me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Moved it to libObject (r328593) for now which is at least correct - if
>>>> someone thinks it'd be more suited to BinaryFormat, I'm happy to move it or
>>>> they can.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm open to ideas & ha...
2018 Mar 21
4
CodeView layering
I'm looking at fixing some layering violations in LLVM & came across a few
in the CodeView handling, specifically:
lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers
I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably
these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF
features used by MC?
include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes