search for: r303258

Hi Daniel, I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: real 18m28.882s user 35m37.091s sys 0m44.726s and for r303259: real 50m52.048s user 88m25.473s sys 0m46.548s If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time. Thanks, Diana On 22 May 2017 at 1...

Nope, no sanitizers. On 22 May 2017 at 11:38, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com> wrote: > Is that with -fsanitize=memory too? > > I'm currently building ToT with r303258 reverted. Once that's done I'll commit the revert and start investigating fixes. > >> On 22 May 2017, at 10:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303...

...22 May 2017, at 10:42, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: > > Nope, no sanitizers. > > On 22 May 2017 at 11:38, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com> > wrote: > > Is that with -fsanitize=memory too? > > I'm currently building ToT with r303258 reverted. Once that's done I'll > commit the revert and start investigating fixes. > > On 22 May 2017, at 10:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 > I get:...

...t; make it a bit faster. Do you have any other ideas to make it work? > > Thanks, > Diana > > > On 22 May 2017 at 11:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: >> real 18m28.882s >> user 35m37.091s >> sys 0m44.726s >> >> and for r303259: >> real 50m52.048s >> user 88m25.473s >> sys 0m46.548s >> >> If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just &g...

...et>InstructionSelector.cpp.o > >> for both ARM and AArch64 didn't show a significant increase. I'll check > whether > >> it made a different to linking. > > > > I don't think it's r303259. Starting with a fully built r303259, then > updating to r303258 and running 'ninja' gives me: > > real 2m28.273s > > user 13m23.171s > > sys 0m47.725s > > then updating to r303259 and running 'ninja' again gives me: > > real 2m19.052s > > user 13m38.802s...

...akeFiles/LLVM<Target>CodeGen.dir/<Target>InstructionSelector.cpp.o > for both ARM and AArch64 didn't show a significant increase. I'll check whether > it made a different to linking. I don't think it's r303259. Starting with a fully built r303259, then updating to r303258 and running 'ninja' gives me: real 2m28.273s user 13m23.171s sys 0m47.725s then updating to r303259 and running 'ninja' again gives me: real 2m19.052s user 13m38.802s sys 0m44.551s > sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast also timed out after one of my commits this morning. > &gt...

...t;>> >>> Thanks, >>> Diana >>> >>> >>> On 22 May 2017 at 11:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: >>>> real 18m28.882s >>>> user 35m37.091s >>>> sys 0m44.726s >>>> >>>> and for r303259: >>>> real 50m52.048s >>>> user 88m25.473s >>>> sys 0m46.548s >>>> >>...

...gt; >>>> >>>> On 22 May 2017 at 11:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org <mailto:diana.picus at linaro.org>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: >>>>> real 18m28.882s >>>>> user 35m37.091s >>>>> sys 0m44.726s >>>>> >>>>> and for r303259: >>>>> real 50m52.048s >>>>> user 88m25.473s >>>>> sys 0m46...

...ou have any other ideas to make it work? >> >> Thanks, >> Diana >> >> >> On 22 May 2017 at 11:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 >> I get: >> real 18m28.882s >> user 35m37.091s >> sys 0m44.726s >> >> and for r303259: >> real 50m52.048s >> user 88m25.473s >> sys 0m46.548s >> >> If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can...

Hi, We've noticed that recently some of our bots (mostly clang-cmake-armv7-a15 and clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15) started timing out whenever someone commits a change to TableGen: r303418: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/7268 r303346: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/7242 r303341: