search for: r303259

Hi Daniel, I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: real 18m28.882s user 35m37.091s sys 0m44.726s and for r303259: real 50m52.048s user 88m25.473s sys 0m46.548s If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time. Thanks, Diana On 22 May 2017 at 10:49, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com> wrote: > r303341 i...

> On 19 May 2017, at 14:54, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > r303259 will have increased compile-time since it tripled the number of importable > SelectionDAG rules but a quick measurement building the affected file: > ninja lib/Target/<Target>/CMakeFiles/LLVM<Target>CodeGen.dir/<Target>InstructionSelector.cpp.o > for both ARM and AArch...

...f I can find it. > > Cheers, > Diana > > On 19 May 2017 at 16:29, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com> > wrote: > > > >> On 19 May 2017, at 14:54, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> r303259 will have increased compile-time since it tripled the number of > importable > >> SelectionDAG rules but a quick measurement building the affected file: > >> ninja lib/Target/<Target>/CMakeFiles/LLVM<Target> > CodeGen.dir/<Target>InstructionSelector.cpp....

...at 10:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: >> real 18m28.882s >> user 35m37.091s >> sys 0m44.726s >> >> and for r303259: >> real 50m52.048s >> user 88m25.473s >> sys 0m46.548s >> >> If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just >> try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time. >> >> Thanks, >> Diana >> >> On...

...y 2017 at 11:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: >> real 18m28.882s >> user 35m37.091s >> sys 0m44.726s >> >> and for r303259: >> real 50m52.048s >> user 88m25.473s >> sys 0m46.548s >> >> If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just >> try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time. >> >> Thanks, >> Diana >> >>...

...xes. > > On 22 May 2017, at 10:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 > I get: > real 18m28.882s > user 35m37.091s > sys 0m44.726s > > and for r303259: > real 50m52.048s > user 88m25.473s > sys 0m46.548s > > If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just > try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time. > > Thanks, > Diana > > On 22 May 2017 at 10:49, Daniel Sanders <dan...

...) started timing out whenever someone commits a change to TableGen: r303418: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/7268 r303346: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/7242 r303341: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/7239 r303259: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/7198 TableGen changes before that (I checked about 3-4 of them) don't have this problem: r303253: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/7197 That one in particular actually finishes the whole build in 635...

...rote: >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: >>>> real 18m28.882s >>>> user 35m37.091s >>>> sys 0m44.726s >>>> >>>> and for r303259: >>>> real 50m52.048s >>>> user 88m25.473s >>>> sys 0m46.548s >>>> >>>> If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just >>>> try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time. >>>&...

...niel, >>>>> >>>>> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 I get: >>>>> real 18m28.882s >>>>> user 35m37.091s >>>>> sys 0m44.726s >>>>> >>>>> and for r303259: >>>>> real 50m52.048s >>>>> user 88m25.473s >>>>> sys 0m46.548s >>>>> >>>>> If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just >>>>> try your fixes and see how they affect compila...

...Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I did your experiment on a TK1 machine (same as the bots) and for r303258 >> I get: >> real 18m28.882s >> user 35m37.091s >> sys 0m44.726s >> >> and for r303259: >> real 50m52.048s >> user 88m25.473s >> sys 0m46.548s >> >> If I can help investigate, please let me know, otherwise we can just >> try your fixes and see how they affect compilation time. >> >> Thanks, >> Diana >> >> On...