Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r300000".
Did you mean:
300000
2014 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] Using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper (redux)
...a vendor publish toolchain #12 based on SVN r250000.
- During subsequent LLVM development, changes happen (!).
For example, a new key letter 'g' in the Data Layout. This is
not a bitcode ambiguity so MODULE_CODE_VERSION is unchanged.
- We as a vendor publish toolchain #13 based on SVN r300000.
- Some middleware provider publishes libIncrediblyUseful.bc built
using spiffy new toolchain #13.
- Some hapless game developer tries to use libIncrediblyUseful.bc
but is still on toolchain #12. This causes an error during some
LTO build phase, of course; the question is, what kind of error...
2014 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper (redux)
...SVN r250000.
> > - During subsequent LLVM development, changes happen (!).
> > For example, a new key letter 'g' in the Data Layout. This is
> > not a bitcode ambiguity so MODULE_CODE_VERSION is unchanged.
> > - We as a vendor publish toolchain #13 based on SVN r300000.
> > - Some middleware provider publishes libIncrediblyUseful.bc built
> > using spiffy new toolchain #13.
> > - Some hapless game developer tries to use libIncrediblyUseful.bc
> > but is still on toolchain #12. This causes an error during some
> > LTO build phas...
2014 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] Using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper (redux)
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > Does Apple support library/middleware providers shipping bitcode instead
>>
>>> > of object code?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>
>> Are there ever any plans to do so?
2014 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper (redux)
...SVN r250000.
> > - During subsequent LLVM development, changes happen (!).
> > For example, a new key letter 'g' in the Data Layout. This is
> > not a bitcode ambiguity so MODULE_CODE_VERSION is unchanged.
> > - We as a vendor publish toolchain #13 based on SVN r300000.
> > - Some middleware provider publishes libIncrediblyUseful.bc built
> > using spiffy new toolchain #13.
> > - Some hapless game developer tries to use libIncrediblyUseful.bc
> > but is still on toolchain #12. This causes an error during some
> > LTO build phas...