search for: r222451

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:51:07AM -0800, Michael Zolotukhin wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I also have several patches that might be useful in 3.5.1. They all are stability fixes: > > r221009: Correctly update dom-tree after loop vectorizer. > r222451: Fix a trip-count overflow issue in LoopUnroll. > r223170 and r223171: PR21302.Vectorize only bottom-tested loops. > Hi Arnold, Nadav, and Hal Are these patches OK for the 3.5 branch. Here are the links: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=221009 http://llvm.or...

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 29 Nov 2014, at 02:48, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > ... > >> I would like to propose the following additional patches for 3.5.1. These will already be part of the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the FreeBSD 11.0 base

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joerg Sonnenberger" <joerg at britannica.bec.de> > To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu, "llvmdev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 7:42:11 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.6 Release] RC3 has been tagged > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:12:20AM -0800, Hans Wennborg wrote: > > I

Hi Jack, On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > What are the acceptable performance regressions in the generated > code for a llvm release? We seem to be badly regressed in some > benchmarks (which I first noticed from the review of 3.6-rc1 at > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm-clang-3.5-3.6-rc1).