Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r217953".
Did you mean:
r210953
2014 Sep 24
3
[LLVMdev] Loops Prevent Function Pointer Inlining?
I've CC'ed Chad Rosier as I think this behaviour is a side-effect of
his revert of IndVarSimplify.cpp (git
c6b1a7e577a0b9e9cff9f9b7ac35a2cde7c448d8, SVN 217962). The change
basically makes the IndVar pass change:
; <label>:4 ; preds = %6, %0
%i.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %0 ], [ %11, %6 ]
%5 = icmp eq i32 %i.0, 0
br i1 %5, label %6, label %17
To:
2015 Feb 17
6
[LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] RC3 has been tagged
Hi Jack,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Jack Howarth
<howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> What are the acceptable performance regressions in the generated
> code for a llvm release? We seem to be badly regressed in some
> benchmarks (which I first noticed from the review of 3.6-rc1 at
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm-clang-3.5-3.6-rc1).
2015 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.6 Release] RC3 has been tagged
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joerg Sonnenberger" <joerg at britannica.bec.de>
> To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu, "llvmdev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 7:42:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.6 Release] RC3 has been tagged
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:12:20AM -0800, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> > I
2015 Feb 18
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.6 Release] RC3 has been tagged
On 02/18/2015 03:01 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
> So it seems that you're one of the very few people that doesn't use
> ToT. Almost everyone else uses it and the progress of LLVM kind of
> assume you do.
My company also does not use ToT. Being able to associate a product
with a well-known release is *very* important to us. It enables
communication with our customers. It allows