search for: r210953

Hi all, sorry to post to both lists, but I'm running into an issue where clang-generated debug info is deemed to be invalid by LLVM tools (throws an assertion error in both llc and mcjit), and I'm not sure what the proper resolution is. Here's a test case; I last tested it on revision r210953: $ cat test1.cpp #include "test.h" test::Test<int> foo1() { return test::Test<int>(); } $ cat test2.cpp namespace test { } #include "test.h" test::Test<int> foo2() { return test::Test<int>(); } $ cat test.h namespace test { template <class T...

...#39;m running into an issue where >> clang-generated debug info is deemed to be invalid by LLVM tools (throws an >> assertion error in both llc and mcjit), and I'm not sure what the proper >> resolution is. >> >> Here's a test case; I last tested it on revision r210953: >> >> $ cat test1.cpp >> #include "test.h" >> test::Test<int> foo1() { >> return test::Test<int>(); >> } >> >> $ cat test2.cpp >> namespace test { >> } >> #include "test.h" >> test::Test<...

...info is deemed to be invalid by LLVM tools (throws an >>>>>> assertion error in both llc and mcjit), and I'm not sure what the proper >>>>>> resolution is. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's a test case; I last tested it on revision r210953: >>>>>> >>>>>> $ cat test1.cpp >>>>>> #include "test.h" >>>>>> test::Test<int> foo1() { >>>>>> return test::Test<int>(); >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>...

...t;>> clang-generated debug info is deemed to be invalid by LLVM tools (throws an >>>> assertion error in both llc and mcjit), and I'm not sure what the proper >>>> resolution is. >>>> >>>> Here's a test case; I last tested it on revision r210953: >>>> >>>> $ cat test1.cpp >>>> #include "test.h" >>>> test::Test<int> foo1() { >>>> return test::Test<int>(); >>>> } >>>> >>>> $ cat test2.cpp >>>> namespace test {...

...LLVM tools (throws an >>>>>>>> assertion error in both llc and mcjit), and I'm not sure what the proper >>>>>>>> resolution is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here's a test case; I last tested it on revision r210953: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ cat test1.cpp >>>>>>>> #include "test.h" >>>>>>>> test::Test<int> foo1() { >>>>>>>> return test::Test<int>(); >>>>>>&...

...t;>>>>>>> assertion error in both llc and mcjit), and I'm not sure what the proper >>>>>>>>>> resolution is. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Here's a test case; I last tested it on revision r210953: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> $ cat test1.cpp >>>>>>>>>> #include "test.h" >>>>>>>>>> test::Test<int> foo1() { >>>>>>>>>> return test::Test...

...gt;> assertion error in both llc and mcjit), and I'm not sure what the proper >>>>>>>>>>>> resolution is. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a test case; I last tested it on revision r210953: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> $ cat test1.cpp >>>>>>>>>>>> #include "test.h" >>>>>>>>>>>> test::Test<int> foo1() { >>>>>>&gt...