Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r187703".
Did you mean:
187703
2013 Aug 03
2
[LLVMdev] bug of tail call optimization on x86 target
Hi Tim,
Thank you for your quick response.
> I'm not convinced that's the best solution, at least conceptually.
> SlotSize really is an unsigned quantity, and though it's unlikely we'd
> like 0x80000000 to be interpreted as positive, rather than negative if
> it ever does occur.
I totally agree with you.
I rewrote my fix and made a test case according to your
2013 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] bug of tail call optimization on x86 target
Hi Katsuhiro,
> I rewrote my fix and made a test case according to your suggestion.
> All of them are included in the attached file.
Thanks very much for doing that and taking the time in the first place
to make the patch. It looked good to me so I committed it in r187703.
It'll automatically make its way into the 3.4 release later this year.
Cheers.
Tim.