search for: r162

Hi, I tried to compile source because for RH9.0 doesn't exist binary. During compiling I got error: *********************** make[3]: Entering directory `/home/allans/R-1.6.2/src/library/methods' dumping R code in package 'methods' Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : couldn't find function "character" Execution halted make[3]: *** [../../../library/methods/R/all.rda]

...ld work . I have tested the script by directly feeding it to ruby with : $ ruby test_script.rb and piping the script to the rails console: $ script/console < test_script.rb Both of which work as expected . I am using the latest release of backgroundrb: 0.2.1 (Released November 28, 2006 - r162) . If it is not possible to use TImeout::timeout in a Worker currently, is there another means to accomplish the same goal as Timeout::timeout ? thanks , george .

...2, R113, R114, R115, R116, R117, R118, R119, R120, R121, R122, R123, R124, R125, R126, R127, R128, R129, R130, R131, R132, R133, R134, R135, R136, R137, R138, R139, R140, R141, R142, R143, R144, R145, R146, R147, R148, R149, R150, R151, R152, R153, R154, R155, R156, R157, R158, R159, R160, R161, R162, R163, R164, R165, R166, R167, R168, R169, R170, R171, R172, R173, R174, R175, R176, R177, R178, R179, R180, R181, R182, R183, R184, R185, R186, R187, R188, R189, R190, R191, R192, R193, R194, R195, R196, R197, R198, R199, R200, R201, R202, R203, R204, R205, R206, R207, R208, R209, R210, R211, R...

Hi Micah, > In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for > argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the > location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a > where or how? the register uses are added by the function X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is the relevant code segment: // Add

Hi, I''m using the latest stable version (0.2.1 (Released November 28, 2006 - r162)) and according to the web site : "the new system uses multi process with IPC to manage workers.So each of your workers will run in their own ruby interpreter." I supposed that each worker run in is own process. That isn''t true. I defined the same instance variable (@toto) in th...

Greetings, I am seeing the following in my log quite a bit 20 + times per day. The stack-trace seems tin indicate an internal issue - is concurrency related? == 0.2.1 (Released November 28, 2006 - r162) My workers continue to function; on the next iteration I believe. Any thoughts are appreciated. cheers, Jodi allow_concurrency=true Scheduler.run failure: undefined method `initial_do_work'' for []:Array Backtrace: /var/www/html/the-soup/vendor/plugins/backgroundrb/server/lib/ backgr...

...//svn.devjavu.com/backgroundrb/tags/release-0.2.1/ = BackgrounDRb Changelog This file contains a summary of changes in particular releases, for a detailed change history and tickets, go to: http://backgroundrb.devjavu.com/projects/backgroundrb/timeline == 0.2.1 (Released November 28, 2006 - r162) This release contains the accumulated fixes and enhancements after the dot oh! release. Beside updating BackgrounDRb, we strongly encourage you to update to Slave 1.1.0 which has important fixes that greatly improve how BackgrounDRb behaves. - Server: Improved logging of server events and except...

Hello, Is file("out.txt", open="wt", encoding=ISOLatin1) (resp: MacRoman, WinAnsi) broken/unimplemented ? I am trying: zz <- file("out.txt", open="wt", encoding=ISOLatin1) cat(ASCII,file = zz, sep="\n") close(zz) on R162 for MacOs (carbon). Thanks. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jean-Pierre Muller SSP / UNIL / BFSH2 / CH-1015 Lausanne