Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "quo_".
Did you mean:
quo
2016 Jul 29
2
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
...me LLVM contributors without noticing!
>
Indeed. The best way I think, all things considered, is that we have a single megarepo where everything LLVM is in there. That way in case anybody wants to make any changes to any part of it, it's a simpler process _especially compared to the status quo_.
Cheers
2016 Jul 29
0
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
On 29 Jul 2016, at 05:11, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> What I meant by “different problem" is that “downstream users” for instance don’t need to commit, that makes their problem/workflow quite different from an upstream developer (for instance it is fairly easy to maintain a read-only view of the existing individual git repo currently on
2016 Jul 29
5
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:32 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mehdi,
>
> This a narrow view IMO: the criteria #1 Chris mentioned to include projects in the monorepo was " must be tightly coupled to specific versions”.
> It means that even with the test suite (and possibly some runtime) out of the monorepo, all the software that is tightly coupled