search for: quo

I made the following example to see what are the difference between expression and quote. But I don't see any difference when they are used with eval()? Could somebody let me know what the difference is between expression and quote? expr=expression(2*3) quo=quote(2*3) eval(expr) str(expr) class(expr) typeof(expr) mode(expr) attributes(expr) eval(quo) str(quo) class(quo) typeo...

Dear Rxperts! A simple example where "write.csv" does not seem to accept user specified arguments.. Why? write.csv(t(1:10),"./te1.csv",quo=F,col.names=F) Warning message: In write.csv(t(1:10), "./te1.csv", quo = F, col.names = F) : attempt to set 'col.names' ignored However, write.table does fine....

...hat > > doesn't hold please? > > With the current implementation... > > int foo(int a) { > return __aeabi_idiv0(a); > } > > returns 'a', while: > > int bar(int a) { > return __aeabi_idiv(a, 0); > } > > returns zero. > > > > Quoting the RTABI: > > > > int __aeabi_idiv0(int return_value); > > long long __aeabi_ldiv0(long long return_value); > > > > The *div0 functions: > > > > 􏰁 Return the value passed to them as a parameter. > > > > Is my copy out of date? > &...

Hi, In the course of my experiments with rt kernels it so happens that the gui versions of tuna built from upstream (RHEL, F11) SRPMs show wrong affinity settings for IRQ threads. Where would be a proper place to report this and get some help on other rt-related issues? Thanks, Sasha

...first column's index is identical to the second's (and vice versa). If that's true, I want to add a further column with value 1 (if true) or NA (if false). Thus, I obtain 100 matrices (for each columns I will have 1-1, 1-2, 1-3 etc). Now, I want R to consider only those matrices whose "new" column has value = 1 & whose total number of rows is equal to 2. I can get R to "print" this result inside the "for" cycle, yet I can't manage to build a single matrix, to store all the results altoghether - which is what I really want. Code example: for (x...

On 21/04/2023 15:11, E Kogler via samba wrote: > Hi fellow Members!I'm Systems administrator at a school using SAMBA 4 as AD DC. > As you know, WIN11 is at the doorstep and my "old" Samba4 Server (4.9) doesn't serve Windows Servers (Server 2019) very well, > e.g. the latest issue is that the domain administrator cannot access the GPO's or other informations from the Samba-LDAP (authentication failure ?). Probably the new 'date' feature (where it...

...h-agent is not so uncommon and yet using sshd is not necessarily the first (or best) solution to come to mind. Having it available as part of openssh would be a useful bridgehead for educating users towards better solutions, when available, and anyway practically improve the security of the status quo. Superior solutions are not very useful if not widely adopted. Dom -- rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13 ed25519: FFB4 0CC3 7F2E 091D F7DA 356E CC79 2832 ED38 CB05

...00, Damien Miller wrote: > > Otherwise, feel free to ask me anything. > > Was it ever considered that the feature itself could be problematic, > security-wise? Of course we considered this. > I see at least two candidates: > - It's IMO generally a bad idea to distribute "better/newer" keys over > a potentially already weaker trust path (i.e. something secured by the > old key). This is strictly no worse than continuing to use the old key, so I don't consider it a problem. > - If some key was compromised (and thus the server itself) an attacker...

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:23 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This patch doesn't change DMAR tables, it creates a way for virtio > device to tell guest "I obey what DMAR tables tell you, you can stop > doing hacks". > > And as PPC guys seem adamant that platform tools there are no good for > that purpose, there's another bit that says "ignore what platform tells > you, I'm not a real device - I'm part of hyper...

On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:23 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This patch doesn't change DMAR tables, it creates a way for virtio > device to tell guest "I obey what DMAR tables tell you, you can stop > doing hacks". > > And as PPC guys seem adamant that platform tools there are no good for > that purpose, there's another bit that says "ignore what platform tells > you, I'm not a real device - I'm part of hyper...

...ase. Just to get wider visibility on this, I'm raising this again as an RFC, as suggested by Roman Lebedev. My original post from last week is here and gives a rationale: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/129854.html. There seemed to be general agreement that the status quo is not ideal. Chris Lattner pointed out that this came up in 2014 as well: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/077685.html I've created a patch to implement the change. Review and comments welcome: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896 <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-de...

Yeah, the alternative is to do movabs and then test, which is doable but I’m not sure if it’s worth it (surely BT + risk of flags merging penalty has to be better than two ops, one of which is ~9-10 bytes). Fiona > On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote: > > My bad on that. So that's what the comment meant. > That means BT is pretty much

...lines, not clear which line failed :( -vv: Prints all the lines up to and including the line that failed :) Option 1: -v: Prints only the failing line :) -vv: Same as today. :) -vvv (new): Prints all the substituted lines, highlighting* the line that failed :) Option 2 (less deviation from status quo): -v: Adopts behavior of -vvv from Option 1. :) -vv: Same as today. :) See also: https://twitter.com/brentdax/status/1154955239620956160 <https://twitter.com/brentdax/status/1154955239620956160> (note: my opinion has changed slightly since my comment there) Varun * highlighting — could be...

...operands of the BUNDLE instruction but that is fine, >> because it basically has a copy of everything inside the bundle. > > The BUNDLE instruction simply isn’t necessary to do anything you just described. That may all be true. However I'd like to point out that this is the status quo! finalizeBundle() will give you the BUNDLE instruction in the header and it is used by everyone using bundles: ARM, and AMDGPU target and the DFAPacketizer (which is used by Hexagon). Not using BUNDLE and correctly using MIBundleOperands at the right places in the register allocator is not where t...

...instruction but that is fine, >>> because it basically has a copy of everything inside the bundle. >> >> The BUNDLE instruction simply isn’t necessary to do anything you just described. > > That may all be true. However I'd like to point out that this is the status quo! finalizeBundle() will give you the BUNDLE instruction in the header and it is used by everyone using bundles: ARM, and AMDGPU target and the DFAPacketizer (which is used by Hexagon). > > Not using BUNDLE and correctly using MIBundleOperands at the right places in the register allocator is n...

...couple of views to the main menu: - My activity: https://reviews.llvm.org/home/menu/view/133/ is (active reviews, recent commits) x (i'm reviewer, i'm author). Only visible when logged in. - All commits: https://reviews.llvm.org/home/menu/view/135/ is the firehose I'd like to make "my activity" the default view for logged-in users, and "all commits" the default when logged out. (This is done by removing "home" from the menu). These aren't optimal for any particular person (e.g. I'd like to see all clangd changes), and people should consider...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 12:40:58 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Target Acceptance Policy...

>> Most development is not "some contributor's fork". > > Well, in the git model every developer has a fork. > >> What you suggest works great for the occasional drive-by >> contributors, but most development is not from drive-by's. > > Not sure what you mean by "drive-by" bu...

Developers: Please visit PR723 http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=723, read it and cast your vote on whether release 1.7 should default the configure script to building optimized or whether the status quo (debug build) should be kept. It is likely that we now have more active users than active developers and we should respond to that change of circumstances with the default build configuration. Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc...

Hi fellow Members!I'm Systems administrator at a school using SAMBA 4 as AD DC. As you know, WIN11 is at the doorstep and my "old" Samba4 Server (4.9) doesn't serve Windows Servers (Server 2019) very well, e.g. the latest issue is that the domain administrator cannot access the GPO's or other informations from the Samba-LDAP (authentication failure ?). I think that it has possibly to do with the version of...