Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "quivalent".
Did you mean:
equivalent
2008 Dec 08
2
Red Hat réagit à la crise économique
L'entreprise Red Hat r?agit ? la crise... en supprimant une ?norme f?te
d'entreprise. Au lieu de cela, ils ont d?cid? de donner l'argent ?
l'?quivalent am?ricain des Restos du Coeur, soit quelque 800.000 repas:
http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1314667.html
J'ai toujours eu un faible pour Red Hat, mais l?, je les appr?cie
carr?ment. Comme quoi l'esprit de partage ne s'arr?te pas au code source.
Nico
2019 Feb 26
0
Using Access Control Lists with SMB2/SMB3 Mounts on Linux Clients
...Thanks for the first reply, Jeremy.
> What about the (future) implementation of RichACL?
Windows ACLs map quite well into RichACLs.
Unfortunately Christolph Hellwig has peristently
blocked any merge of the RichACLs code into the
Linux kernel.
If you use ZFS then you can use ZFSACLs which
are quivalent.
> Will there be any native Linux Client support along with the SMB2/SMB3 protocol?
> I know, there is a native implemenation for RichACLs in ext4 FS.
> Unfortunately, smbcals is not a native Linux ACL Tool and has a very unhandy syntax.
> I just tested some days ago. ;-)
> I am lo...
2004 Jul 23
1
discriminant analysis
...39;un grand nombre d'individus. Je
cherche ?? estimer les liens existant entre une de ces variables
(occupation du sol) et les 50 autres (variables g??omorphologiques,
hydrographiques...). J'ai enviseag?? d'utiliser une "analyse
discriminante sur variables qualitatives" (??quivalent ?? DISQUAL dans
SPAD) ou alors un "mod??le log-lin??aire". Je souhaiterais connaitre quels
packages R vous paraissent les plus judicieux pour mener ?? bien ces
m??thodes. A moins que vous ne me conseilliez une autre m??thode.
Merci d'avance.
POMazagol
2019 Feb 26
2
Using Access Control Lists with SMB2/SMB3 Mounts on Linux Clients
Thanks for the first reply, Jeremy.
What about the (future) implementation of RichACL?
Will there be any native Linux Client support along with the SMB2/SMB3 protocol?
I know, there is a native implemenation for RichACLs in ext4 FS.
Unfortunately, smbcals is not a native Linux ACL Tool and has a very unhandy syntax.
I just tested some days ago. ;-)
I am looking for a solution that allows the
2006 Oct 04
3
do we need stubbing?
Hey all -
The trunk currently supports three types of mocking/stubbing:
Mock Objects (created dynamically at runtime)
Partial Mocking of methods on existing classes
Stubbing of methods on existing objects or classes
The main difference between Partial Mocking and Stubbing is that Stubs
don''t verify.
I''m wondering if we really need the stubbing facility at all, given
that we