search for: quieting

Syslinux version 3.74 introduced the following change (I know, old news really) -> Suppress the Loading ... message if "quiet" is specified on the kernel command line. Unfortunately, for our PXELinux environment this was a very unwanted change. The linux command line parameter 'quiet' is included and passed to linux because we want (and in cases absolutely require) that the

Calling library(..., quietly=TRUE) may still output: Loading required package: <other pkg> in some cases, e.g. > library("R.utils", quietly=TRUE) Loading required package: R.methodsS3 [...] I traced this to base:::.getRequiredPackages2(), which forgets to pass 'quietly' to an internal library() call: if (!attached) { if (!quietly)

When you add "quiet" to the append line, Syslinux doesn't display the file reading progress anymore. When you use this option to boot an image with MEMDISK, you still get a lot of text. ========================== LABEL mydisk LINUX memdisk INITRD mydisk.img APPEND raw quiet ========================== The following patch makes MEMDISK silent when the quiet keyword is passed to the

Hi, everyone: I ask for help about translating a stata program into R. The program perform cross validation as it stated. #1. Randomly divide the data set into 10 sets of equal size, ensuring equal numbers of events in each set #2. Fit the model leaving out the 1st set #3. Apply the fitted model in (2) to the 1st set to obtain the predicted probability of a prostate cancer diagnosis. #4. Repeat

I understand that the action of pxelinux has changed so that when "quiet" is specified in append you no longer see the progress of the kernel and init image download. My question is, is it possible to have pxelinux be verbose (ie: show progress), but then pass quiet to the linux kernel so it is quiet. I run a downstream project that uses pxelinux and I wanted to know if this is

If I boot with "rhgb quiet" off, my computer boots in 1 minute and 30 seconds. If I boot with "rhgb quiet" on, my computer boots in 3m11s. That's a long time to wait. Significantly, when booting with "rhgb quiet", right at the moment X takes over, there is a 1m36s pause where the screen is blank except for the hourglass cursor turning around and around. Of

Dear R-devel, Consider the following clip (in R version 3.6.0, Windows): > requireNamespace("ggplot2", quietly = TRUE) Registered S3 methods overwritten by 'ggplot2': method from [.quosures rlang c.quosures rlang print.quosures rlang It seems to me that if one specifies 'quietly = TRUE', then messages about S3 method

Hello, I'm running Asterisk 1.0.6 with zaptel 1.0.6 on Gentoo Linux with a 2.6.11-gentoo-r2 SMP kernel (but no SMP hardware) and mpg123 0.59s-r9. When I leave a voicemail message via my X100P, the message is way too quiet. I can barely hear it. I googled this a bit, and I saw similar complaints with older versions, but no resolutions. Also, many complained that it was only too quiet via

I''m using RSpec on Rails and would like to clean up the backtraces, so I went looking for an RSpec equivalent to ThoughtBot''s Quiet Backtrace gem<http://thoughtbot.com/projects/quietbacktrace>. I found Spec::Runner::QuietBacktraceTweaker in the RDOCS, but I can''t figure out how to use it. Can I add something to spec_helper.rb that will utilize

Pass -q to virsh if virt-v2v was run with -q, to reduce its output in quiet mode. Unfortunately this does not currently work in virsh as it should, see RHBZ#1358179, so only after that bug is fixed this change can actually take effect. --- v2v/output_libvirt.ml | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2v/output_libvirt.ml b/v2v/output_libvirt.ml

Hi, The `quietly` argument of `require` is documented as follows: quietly: a logical. If ?TRUE?, no message confirming package attaching is printed, and most often, no errors/warnings are printed if package attaching fails. However: > require(foo, quietly=TRUE) Warning message: In library(package, lib.loc = lib.loc, character.only = TRUE, logical.return = TRUE, :

Hi, I have recently tried to check the test coverage using library("covr") and, interestingly, the command > covr::package_coverage() fails, while > covr::package_coverage(quiet = FALSE) runs through without problem. I traced the problem to a call to utils::install.packages(), where the option quiet is passed on. In utils::install.packages(), the problem seems to lie in the

Hi, Recently We've upgraded some KVM hosts from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 and now experience broken VM configurations on filesystem after virsh blockcommit. Commands "virsh dumpxml ..." and "virsh dumpxml --inactive ..." is showing diffrent configuration than the one on filesystem. In case of restart libvirtd or system reboot, there are broken VM xml configurations on

I have an upcoming install which places the switch close to some employees in a quiet work environment. Can anyone recommend a quiet 24 port POE switch? The Linksys SRW224P behind me right now would be objectionable, I'm sure. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear Russ, I had the same problem in my vignettes and setting both message and warning to FALSE seems to remove all unwanted output: ```{r message=FALSE, warning=FALSE} library("afex") library("ggplot2") library("cowplot") theme_set(theme_grey()) ``` Result: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/afex/vignettes/afex_plot_introduction.html Best, Henrik Am Di.,

Lionel, Thanks for your response. I understand that method overriding can be a serious issue, but as you say, this is not something that the user can act upon. Yet the message lands at the user?s feet. In my case, the messages are cluttering my package vignettes, and may or may not represent what users see if they themselves run the vignette code, depending on what version of ggplot2, etc. they

Hello, I'm running FreeBSD 8.3-stable on a machine with an AMD A8-5600K cpu. tingo at kg-quiet$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #2: Fri Jan 4 19:18:15 CET 2013 root at kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 tingo at kg-quiet$ dmesg | grep CPU | head -1 CPU: AMD A8-5600K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics (3618.02-MHz K8-class CPU)

Well, I'm getting a warning (not an error) when the package doesn't exist. I interpreted "most often" to mean that suppressing warnings/errors is why you'd most often use this argument, as most packages don't emit startup messages. And technically there isn't a problem with attaching the package, since we don't even try to attach packages that don't exist.

Hi, how to suppress a "loading required package:... " message? Kind regards Jaci --

Don't pass these flags to dozens of functions. --- builder/builder.ml | 47 +++++++++-------- builder/cache.ml | 4 +- builder/cache.mli | 2 +- builder/cmdline.ml | 13 ++--- builder/downloader.ml | 14 +++-- builder/downloader.mli