search for: qualms

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 01:47:21PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Saturday, December 16, 2017 3:22 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:49:15AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > Here's the API I'm looking at right now. The user need take no lock; > > > the locking (spinlock) is handled internally to the implementation. > > Another

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 01:47:21PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Saturday, December 16, 2017 3:22 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:49:15AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > Here's the API I'm looking at right now. The user need take no lock; > > > the locking (spinlock) is handled internally to the implementation. > > Another

...ly. Code generated for undefined behavior "works" on a > best-effort basis. I still think that in the cases where clang/gcc can detect undefined behavior they should absolutely refuse to compile the programs. i + i++ is undefined value, both clang an gcc compile this without any moral qualms - no warnings - nothing - complete psychopathic behavior :-) /joe > Csaba > -- > GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ > The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers. > Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. > "Ok...

Hi all, Peter Abrahamsen has duplicated all of the documentation and cookbook pages in Puppet''s Trac page: https://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/DocumentationStart Please let me or Peter know if there are any problems. -- A motion to adjourn is always in order. --Robert Heinlein --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Joe Armstrong wrote: > > It seems very strange to me that the ansi standard says "XXX is > undefined" and that both clang and gcc > can detect that something is undefined and that by default they > compile the offending code without > any feelings of guilt. "The good thing — the only good thing! — about undefined behavior in

...icate on the new 64 bit machine what I had been doing on the old 32 bit machine. Note, I routinely develop new software using MS VS (originally v 6, and then VS 2005, and now vs 2010), and if I need to work up code to run on some flavour of unix, I use the cygwin environment. Therefore, I have no qualms about compiling programs I use from source. I just prefer not to if there is already a binary distribution for whatever platform I happen to be using. I began by trying to follow the instructions provided on http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/RMySQL, and found a couple issues. First, t...

On 12/18/2017 06:18 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 01:47:21PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: >> On Saturday, December 16, 2017 3:22 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:49:15AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> - xbit_clear() can't return an error. Neither can xbit_zero(). >> I found the current xbit_clear implementation

...;ve taken to compile a kernel and deploy it. I'm not quite sure where this would best go, so any guidance would be appreciated. I was guessing that http://wiki.centos.org/Projects/CentOS5PentiumSupport would be the best location for the edits, but if you can think of a better place I've no qualms. The page would go into further detail of the steps here: http://wiki.centos.org/TimothyLee/centos5_i586_patch plus how to use Mock to build the packages sanely, how to deploy the i586 packages to another system without destroying it, etc. What would be covered is the process I used to: Modifying...

Is the primary difference between the current version download (e.g., 2.15.1) and the "patched" download of these R files that the patched files have NOT been verified? Please confirm and thanks! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Thanks Olly, I have given flint a go -and it is generally much quicker (once it has loaded the cache -that process still takes minutes). Flint actually seems tro do some caching whereas quartz just seemed to hit the disc constantly. Generally I've been running it on a machine with 5G of memory -but it has to contend with other processes for resources, I have also run it on its own on a 1G

OTCPicks.com Picks SREA As The Stock to Watch. UP 272% In 7 Days! Score One Inc. SREA $0.30 UP 20% Today Up another 20% today and over 272% in the last 7 days, OTCPICKS.com puts SREA on their watch list. Read up and get on SREA first thing Wed! Didn't know it was that much. Other methods are too dangerous when it comes to fishtailing vehicles and heavy winds. You can buy them over the

OTCPicks.com Picks SREA As The Stock to Watch. UP 272% In 7 Days! Score One Inc. SREA $0.30 UP 20% Today Up another 20% today and over 272% in the last 7 days, OTCPICKS.com puts SREA on their watch list. Read up and get on SREA first thing Wed! Didn't know it was that much. Other methods are too dangerous when it comes to fishtailing vehicles and heavy winds. You can buy them over the

Full_Name: Sahotra Sarkar Version: 2.2.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (128.83.34.44) This is not a bug: I'm just wondering why chisq.test does not allow the specification of the degree of freedom (df).

...resulted in https://bugs.debian.org/850614, so I'm considering patching this out of fill_default_server_options given that the Debian packaging scripts ensure that all necessary host keys are generated so something newer should always be available; but it seems worth asking if you have serious qualms about that approach. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Hi Micah, I'm no core developer, but FWIW here are my thoughts: I'm general I think the patch is too OpenCL oriented, and I have some niggling qualms about other parts. Specifically (comments inline): From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Villmow, Micah Sent: 03 October 2011 19:37 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Proposal to make LLVM-IR endian agnostic One of t...

We noticed this bug in more complex code, but this succinctly describes the phenomenon. If you do not re-initialize a each time in the following loop, the final value only is assigned to all places when the loop is complete. > a <- b <- list() > for(i in 1:5) { + a$alpha <- i + b[[i]] <- a + } > unlist(b) alpha alpha alpha alpha alpha 5 5 5 5 5 If a is

The following variables have the following significant relationships (x is the explanatory variable): linear, cubic, exponential, logistic. The linear relationship plots without any trouble. Cubic is the 'best' model, but it is not plotting as a smooth curve using the following code: cubic.lm<- lm(y~poly(x,3)) lines(x,predict(cubic.lm),lwd=2) How do I plot the data and the estimated

I''m having trouble even installing new rails apps. I get to the Bundle run, and it errors on Json, here''s what my error says. I''m new to ALL of this, including Terminal commands, etc. Hope someone can help me out. Runs the Bundler.... then I error out at this: "Installing json (1.7.6) with native extensions Gem::Installer::ExtensionBuildError: ERROR: Failed to

...ext IR. Is the type-checking of pointer types still done when constructing IR through builder APIs? Otherwise this makes debugging significantly harder for me. I've also really liked how readable LLVM IR is, and it would seem like this change would negatively affect the readability. I have no qualms with not propagating any of the pointer type data to lower-level LLVM APIs and from the discussion, it seems like I'll still be allowed to have the types in there for backwards compatibility, but I wonder if it wouldn't be worthwhile to also keep some of the type-checking in the verificatio...

So, I hear, in a couple weeks'' time, opensolaris.org is shutting down. What does that mean for this mailing list? Should we all be moving over to something at illumos or something? I''m going to encourage somebody in an official capacity at opensolaris to respond... I''m going to discourage unofficial responses, like, illumos enthusiasts etc simply trying to get people