search for: qualif

We have a tenant who has been having issues with a congested connection and in trouble shooting it we've noticed that there seems to be a lot of SIP traffic even when none of the phones are doing anything. We've determined that this traffic is mostly INFO packets generated by setting qualify=2000. I understand that 2000 ms is the default value for the qualification parameter but what I'm unclear on is exactly what the purpose of having asterisk qualify the phones is. I know that in a NAT situation, qualifications can help keep UDP sessions open in the firewall but in our case m...

Hi all, I have a question related to GSoC. One of my students submitted an idea [1] for a GSoC project and I would be interested in (co-)mentoring this project but I'm unsure of the qualification requirements for acting as a mentor. Is there anyone that can clarify the requirements here? I have been working with LLVM for several years now but mostly on projects outside of the main LLVM repository. At our university we are currently maintaining two backends for our own custom ar...

Hi, I'm splitting this discussion off of my RFC for release process changes. We currently have no official release qualification criteria. In other words, we don't have any blocking tests that need to pass in order to make a new release. We do time-based releases, which is not always compatible with having quality-based criteria for tagging a final release. So, I think another way to look at this issue is to ta...

Hi Raja, I'm open to suggestions. Our current release qualification is to bootstrap the compiler (similar to how GCC does their bootstrapping), run the test suites, and verify that there are no regressions. Improving the test suite is always welcome. In addition, we send out pre-release tarballs and have people in the community build and test their programs...

...munity build and test their programs with it. This is not a perfect >> system, but it's one which works for us given the number of testers >> available, the amount of time and resources they have, and whatever >> fixes need to be merged into the release. >> >> ARM qualification is a bit trickier, because of the different specific >> chips out there, different OSes, and having to verify ARM, Thumb1, and >> Thumb2 for the same configurations. And the tests tend to run a bit >> slower than, say, an x86 chip. So it's mostly a matter of time and &g...

...codegen and targets. I'm also the one of main developers on the original ARM target. That means, I would make the decisions on major development on ARM target if there are decisions to be made. > > But my role is very different from what people are looking for in this thread. To properly qualify a target like ARM which are supported on many different CPUs and platforms, we need a group of volunteers. This is critical near release time for obvious reasons, but it's also welcome between releases as well. LLVM.org doesn't explicitly name these "maintainers". I personally do...

...2:39 PM, Roel Jordans via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have a question related to GSoC. One of my students submitted an idea [1] for a GSoC project and I would be interested in (co-)mentoring this project but I'm unsure of the qualification requirements for acting as a mentor. Is there anyone that can clarify the requirements here? > We don’t have any explicit requirement. > >> I have been working with LLVM for several years now but mostly on projects outside of the main LLVM repository. At our university we are c...

I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be tested. I & my team use ARM hardware for running tests and we run all test LLVM test suite tests as part of qualification process. I had started a similar conversation in llvm-commits, but...

...eople in the > community build and test their programs with it. This is not a perfect > system, but it's one which works for us given the number of testers > available, the amount of time and resources they have, and whatever > fixes need to be merged into the release. > > ARM qualification is a bit trickier, because of the different specific > chips out there, different OSes, and having to verify ARM, Thumb1, and > Thumb2 for the same configurations. And the tests tend to run a bit > slower than, say, an x86 chip. So it's mostly a matter of time and > resources...

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: >> It is in fact highly in my own interest to get them running. I just >> need to be pointed to the document that tells me what the buildbot >> master expects to see and defines a procedure for adding them as slaves. >> > Daniel may have the details you need to get this up and running. Great! It would also help if

Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> writes: >> Resources isn't the only problem. I've asked several times about adding >> my personal machines to the testing pool but I never get a reply. So >> there they sit idle every day, processing the occasional e-mail when >> they could be chewing LLVM tests. >> > > I'm pretty sure this has been

On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:37 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> writes: > >>> Resources isn't the only problem. I've asked several times about adding >>> my personal machines to the testing pool but I never get a reply. So >>> there they sit idle every day, processing the occasional e-mail when >>> they could

...vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index 7a61427af370..538044edddfc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -5185,8 +5185,8 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) EPT_VIOLATION_EXECUTABLE)) ? PFERR_PRESENT_MASK : 0; - error_code |= (exit_qualification & 0x100) != 0 ? - PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK : PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK; + error_code |= (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_TRANSLATED) + ? PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK : PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK; vcpu->arch.exit_qualification = exit_qualification; return kvm_mmu_page_fau...

...munity build and test their programs with it. This is not a perfect >> system, but it's one which works for us given the number of testers >> available, the amount of time and resources they have, and whatever >> fixes need to be merged into the release. >> >> ARM qualification is a bit trickier, because of the different specific >> chips out there, different OSes, and having to verify ARM, Thumb1, and >> Thumb2 for the same configurations. And the tests tend to run a bit >> slower than, say, an x86 chip. So it's mostly a matter of time and &g...

On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:20:17PM -0500, David A. Greene wrote: >> This seems excessive and unrealistic. We're never going to come up with >> a testsuite that satisfies everyone's needs and doing so could well be >> counter-productive. If no one can commit anything unless it passes >> every test

...org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have a question related to GSoC. One of my students submitted an idea [1] for a GSoC project and I would be interested in (co-)mentoring this project but I'm unsure of the qualification requirements for acting as a mentor. Is there anyone that can clarify the requirements here? > > We don’t have any explicit requirement. > > > >> I have been working with LLVM for several years now but mostly on projects outside of the main LLVM repository. At our univ...

"Raja Venkateswaran" <rajav at codeaurora.org> writes: > I think we need to think along two dimensions - Breadth of testing and depth > of testing > > 1. Breadth: What the best supported ARM ISA versions in LLVM ARM? Say its > armv6 and armv7; We need to > - regression test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 mode (armv6) > - Performance/code-size test ARM mode,

...and SMTP/s as well? So requests for domain1.com goes to all services/protocols in cPanel. And requests for domain2.com goes to all services/protocols in Exchange 2016. Is that possible? Please advise. Thank you very much. ===BEGIN SIGNATURE=== Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017 [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming ===END SIGNATURE=== ________________________________ From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Richard Grainger <gra...

I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be tested. I & my team use ARM hardware for running tests and we run all LLVM test suite tests as part of qualification process. I had started a similar conversation in llvm-commits, but this...

...position, you will work on general frontend development in Clang, with a particular focus on engineering new language and compiler features. Experience with development of C++ frontends is desirable for this position, but all strong candidates with frontend experience are encouraged to apply. Key Qualifications * Strong C++ coding skills and a passion for writing clean, high performing code. * Knowledge of compiler frontends and related tools. * Familiarity with compiler optimizations, code generation, and overall design of compilers. * Expert knowledge of C and C++, with a detailed understanding...