search for: quaids

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a heads up that we're pulling together a last-hour discussion with the two GSoC students and myself in about 90 minutes in #centos-devel to discuss how the docs toolchain project will shape up - -- split the project, set timelines, and discuss resource needs. We'll post a log after the meeting is done, just wanted to send out a heads up

On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > >> In >> http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2c >> >> ca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as >> FirstnameLastname. >> >> In

https://git.centos.org/summary/websites!centos.org.git >--------------------------------------------------------------- master branch updated (1 commits) >--------------------------------------------------------------- Karsten Wade <quaid at iquaid.org> Thursday, September 14, 2017 17:28 +0000 Updating to match current situation & be more general. - Aligns with changes to

Hi, I would like to estimate a quadratic almost ideal demand system in R which is estimated usually by nonlinear seemingly unrelated regression. But there is no such function in R yet but it is readily available in STATA (nlsur), see B. Poi (2008): Demand-system estimation: Update, Stata Journal 8(4). Now I am thinking, what is quicker learning to "program" STATA which seems not really

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > > <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> In > >> http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2c > >> > >> > ca54dd79e5

On Dec 23 16:29, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > > > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > > > <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> In > > >>

Please read this in the spirit of my understanding what the CentOS community norms are. I fault neither of those mentioned for doing what they have done. I just want to understand how we all are documenting the CentOS distribution. In http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as FirstnameLastname. In

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is the app at http://possereg.teachingopensource.org still being used? If so, can we migrate that to the main TOS server? If not, I'd like to take it down as part of a server migration we're doing for theopensourceway.org host. Thanks - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2015 09:19 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > An alternative approach would be to build the docs in CI and link > to the built version in a comment on both systems. This is an interesting idea. We'll end up wanting docs to build in the CI anyway, so this could be done using e.g. a -draft tag so an initial commit can be used to both build

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs > what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit > different. Or is this development the first step in the transition > away from the wiki to another medium? That's a good question, and I don't have it

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a change to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. from 2459e4e Correct download links for ISO images for 7.7.1810 release new 0ce3254 Updating who/what/where/why for the world of two CentOS distros. - Quick blurb about each distro begins answering questions about the new distro - Release

> ? 2015?6?5????6:10?Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> ??? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/04/2015 12:58 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > >> >> I'm tentatively planning on working pagure[0] into the Fedora Docs >> toolchain. It handles issue tracking, process >> documentation/contribution guidelines, and of course

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Brian Stinson <bstinson at ksu.edu> wrote: > On Dec 23 16:29, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > > > > <patrickdgarveyt at

On Jun 4, 2015 12:17 PM, "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/01/2015 10:30 PM, Lei Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As discussed earlier about the workflow, I and Kunaal will need a > > server space to host Bugzilla, a test repository at Github + a git > > repository at

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/2015 01:52 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 06/05/2015 08:30 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Folks: >> >> A few of us (KB, Johnny, myself) have begun work on updating the >> main FAQs on the CentOS wiki. Mainly that means looking over and >> updating

Hi Kartsen, you'll have my proposal by the end of the day. I am not good at writing content. :( I have sorted out all the technicalities though. Regards, Kunal Jain On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kunaal: > > I know you are still researching, but I think you may have

Dear helpers please provide me some helpful answer to my problem while I m trying to run a program .I m attaching both the program and the data to which I have to obtain my estimation results. "Motives.dat" is the data file, and "OBTfile4.3" is the complete code of program. by Running this // rawdata<-matrix(scan(inputFile, n = nsubj*ncomp), nsubj, ncomp, byrow = TRUE) \\

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Shaun McCance <shaunm at redhat.com> wrote: > Just to throw another wrench in: I don't know what DigitalOcean's docs > are like, but Linode generally provides their guides for Ubuntu, Debian, > and CentOS. However, for whatever reason, they tend to do Ubuntu first. > So there are bunches of guides without CentOS versions. > > They do

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There have been some questions about how the GSoC project interacts with the existing documentation work that happens around the wiki. Let's get all the open questions in to this thread and discuss them. Lei, Kunaal -- What other open questions do we have? Anyone else with open questions? The GSoC project is supposed to be additive to what we

On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. > However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and > we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] > > Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a > violation of the trademark. > > [0]: