search for: pyes

.... Error z value Pr(>|z|)    (Intercept)  5.59850    0.05886  95.116  < 2e-16 *** SL          -0.16542    0.08573  -1.930  0.05366 .  SLM          0.20372    0.07841   2.598  0.00937 ** SUM          0.32331    0.07664   4.219 2.46e-05 *** EL          -0.59471    0.09234  -6.441 1.19e-10 *** PYes         1.08107    0.06731  16.060  < 2e-16 *** SL:EL        1.78588    0.11444  15.606  < 2e-16 *** SLM:EL       1.23178    0.10987  11.211  < 2e-16 *** SUM:EL       0.71532    0.11136   6.424 1.33e-10 *** SL:PYes     -1.59311    0.11527 -13.820  < 2e-16 *** SLM:PYes    -1.17298    0.0...

Hi all I need a little clarification with regard to Omega's behaviour with 'duplicate' files when running 'omindex'. How is a duplicate recognised? Is it simply by file path? How is an unmodified file detected, if at all? I would like to set up subversion post-commit hook to update my index. If possible I would like to just update the index with the newly commited files.

...in numerical evaluation to zero? In calculating the log likelihood you then have a log(0) problem. Here is a simple example (probit) which illustrates the problem: x<-c(1,2,3,4,100) ntrials<-100 yes<-round(ntrials*pnorm((x-3)/1)) #points fall on normal CDF mean=3, sd=1 no<-ntrials-yes pyes<-yes/ntrials py<-function(b,x) pnorm((x-b[1])/b[2]) loglike<-function(b) -sum( yes*log(py(b,x)) + no*log(1-py(b,x)) ) out<-nlm(loglike,p=c(3,1),hessian=TRUE) In this example the right-most point gives a p(yes) of 1; 1-1=0; log(0) gives "NA/Inf replaced by maximum positive value&qu...

On 29 July 2015 at 23:11, Ben Pye <ben at curlybracket.co.uk> wrote: > 4.8.4, again packaged from Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, not sure if they include any > patches that'd change this behaviour. This should be similar to 4.8.2 that I have, so no worries there. cheers, --renato

On 5/18/06, John Pye <john.pye@student.unsw.edu.au> wrote: > BTW I got my updated xapian-omega RPM. Thanks guys! > Enjoy :-) Fabrice

Hi there.. I'm another ext3 newbie and I have patched and installed 2.4.12-ac1, and compiled from source the above utils.. I saw a link a while back for rpms for these, and I was wondering if anybody knew the url... Also, the question everybody wants to know I think - Does anybody have any idea when the ext3 code will enter the stable kernel tree (not -ac)? I am assuming RH might wait

> Hi there. > > > I'm trying to install samba 2.2.5 from source on solaris 2.5 sparc. It > compiles with no problems, and smbd + nmbd will run, and shares are > accessible. However, when I try to use smbpasswd to join the domain the > following occurs: > > smbpasswd -D 5 -j simpsons -r krusty -U administrator%myadminpasswordhere > > > provides the

Hi Ben, I am aware of the bug. I have downloaded the test case and look around few days ago. However, I am still trying to figure out the situation. Thus, I have no further comments at the moment. BTW, as an amateur LLVM developer, I am fixing the issues with my spare time, thus I have to prioritize the tasks (3.7 release gets much higher priority currently) and sorry for not being

Hi there.. I'm trying to install samba 2.2.5 from source on solaris 2.5 sparc. It compiles with no problems, and smbd + nmbd will run, and shares are accessible. However, when I try to use smbpasswd to join the domain the following occurs: smbpasswd -D 5 -j simpsons -r krusty -U administrator%myadminpasswordhere provides the following debug info: Initialising global parameters

> There are a lot of Windows folks in LLVM, and certainly good support > for it, including on ARM, so maybe that would get more traction and > even get done quicker than trying to debug here a problem in an > external library. Even though you want your CoreCLR to work on > Android, I assume this will be mainly developed from a Windows IDE, so > IDE folks that know a thing or two

Hi all, I'm working on the CoreCLR project, coordinating a community effort to produce an Android port of Microsoft's open-source version of the CLR.  A major part of that is getting everything to run on the ARM32 architecture, which is by far the most common CPU for Android devices. A couple weeks ago, Ben Pye, a developer working on the ARM32 stuff, found and reported a bug related to

On 29 July 2015 at 16:53, Mason Wheeler <masonwheeler at yahoo.com> wrote: > A couple weeks ago, Ben Pye, a developer working on the ARM32 stuff, found > and reported a bug related to incorrect generation of stack unwinding info. > ( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24146 ) Apparently it only occurs > under a highly specific set of circumstances, which might look like a

On 29 July 2015 at 22:46, Ben Pye <ben at curlybracket.co.uk> wrote: > I certainly understand the issue in using PathScale's libunwind, but the > lack of unw_get_save_loc is somewhat problematic and means that it is > preferable to use the other libunwind within coreclr. Or, you could try to persuade people to implement that in LLVM? There are a lot of Windows folks in LLVM,

Hello- I upgraded Samba from 4.6 to 4.8 on a FreeBSD 11.2 server. After the upgrade, users cannot access the HOME folder share but they can access other shares just fine. I am using the RID backend on this member server that connects to Windows-based domain controllers. I apologize for the lengthy smb4.conf but here it is: #======================= Global Settings

On 29 July 2015 at 22:20, Ben Pye <ben at curlybracket.co.uk> wrote: > Not sure if you got the other message, I think I managed to split the topic > as I wasn't subscribed to receive the previous message. This error has been > on the Raspberry Pi 2, so that's a Cortex A7 I believe, certainly ARMv7. Excellent! > I > haven't yet built trunk as on the device I run

> You should also realise that using another libunwind makes matters > more complex, because now it's far less likely that the LLVM's > libunwind folks will be interested in fixing that... I certainly understand the issue in using PathScale's libunwind, but the lack of unw_get_save_loc is somewhat problematic and means that it is preferable to use the other libunwind within

> Yes, so, that's yet another missing info. Which ARM? RaspberyPi, > although popular, is a very old and somewhat deprecated architecture > (ARMv6). Most people work on ARMv7 and ARMv8 nowadays, so if you can't > reproduce the bugs on those, you'll have a hard time finding people to > help you. > Also, Clang 3.6 is not that old, but we don't really provide >

Here is a short proposal for the hybrid storage cache idea with introduction/motivation and a bird''s eye view of an approach to implement a hybrid storage cache for btrfs. Please note that there is currently no available patches. We would like to get as much input before as possible before we start designing and implementing a solution. 1. Introduction The emerge of Solid State

Hi, After reading through the btrfs documentation I''m curious to know if it''s possible to ever securely erase a file from a btrfs filesystem (or ZFS for that matter). On non-COW filesystems atop regular HDDs one can simply overwrite the file with zeros or random data using dd or some other tool and rest assured that the blocks which contained the sensitive information have

> From: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > > > On 29 July 2015 at 16:53, Mason Wheeler <masonwheeler at yahoo.com> wrote: > > A couple weeks ago, Ben Pye, a developer working on the ARM32 stuff, found > > and reported a bug related to incorrect generation of stack unwinding info. > > ( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24146 ) Apparently it