search for: pwb

...sw/excellon/fileview.exe Tue Jul 14 07:30:08 1998 27132 DENY_WRITE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH sw/laser/debug/laser.exe Tue Jul 14 07:03:43 1998 26453 DENY_NONE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH sw/excellon/ois.wax Tue Jul 14 05:07:39 1998 26453 DENY_NONE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH ois-data/pwb/DHM1265B/setup.txt Tue Jul 14 07:30:09 1998 27132 DENY_NONE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH ois-data/laser/LONGBOW MISSILE A1/asymtek.fm2 Tue Jul 14 07:04:36 1998 27132 DENY_NONE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH ois-data/laser/LONGBOW MISSILE A1/asymtek.acl Tue Jul 14 07:04:36 1998 26406 DENY_NON...

Once upon a time, JJB <jack at internetguy.net> said: > Interesting. Back in 1980 we called /bin/sh the Mashey shell. It > did not have command substitution or other things we now take for > granted. Bourne did that for us. So there's a version or two > missing in history... Check the history here: https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo -- Chris Adams

hey guys I have a panel data set that i want to perform some regressions on. I am using the /plm/ package. I defined a model in the following way: PWBw.pool <- plm(*PWB* ~ log(*I_EQON*) + log(*RD*) + ... + *PAGRI*, data = pfem, na.action=na.exclude, model="pooling") When i run this it gives the following error (the error remains when i use other model = "" specifications like "within" or "random"): /Fe...

Folks, I *suggest* that little or no reply to this is warranted. It's just the statements of an old fart trying to make a (slightly) better environment for all of us. These thoughts are offered for consideration and use as you see fit. For some, "Hey, that'll work for me too" is the hoped for result. No discussion is intended or warranted, IMO. If you recognize yourself in

...f the task is highly dependent on whether you know your way around the Mac API to begin with. As for compilers, I have no knowledge of the Mac platform, but in general freeware is preferred, if it exists (and works!), because it enlarges the number of potential bugfixers. (I saw something about the PWB being available freely from Apple now). I'll Cc: this one to R-devel too. If anyone there who actually know what they're talking about (as opposed to me) re. Macs have anything to add, please do. --------- John Bacon-Shone <johnbs@hku.hk> writes: > >Seriously speaking, yes, w...

...on or other things we now take for >> granted. Bourne did that for us. So there's a version or two >> missing in history... > Check the history here: > > https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo > This history might be that of a particular lineage. CB UNIX and PWB UNIX existed in the gap between 1975 and 1979. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CB_UNIX Jack

...roblems using log() in a plm() regression. Message-ID: <1321878793485-4091377.post at n4.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii hey guys I have a panel data set that i want to perform some regressions on. I am using the /plm/ package. I defined a model in the following way: PWBw.pool <- plm(*PWB* ~ log(*I_EQON*) + log(*RD*) + ... + *PAGRI*, data = pfem, na.action=na.exclude, model="pooling") When i run this it gives the following error (the error remains when i use other model = "" specifications like "within" or "random"): /Fe...

>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >> > >> > > Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for > OpenBSD which uses a patched version of the Public Domain Korn Shell

The first release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, and powerpc64. The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message. The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.1/ (or any of the FreeBSD mirror sites). Current