search for: pvop

...ommand "git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.gitlinux-2.6-xen" from now? I mean, the "make prep-kernels" command of the xen-4.1.0 no longer does this to us? My examples: administrativo@xen01:~/*xen-4.0.1*$ *make prep-kernels* *for i in linux-2.6-pvops ; do make $i-prep || exit 1; done* make[1]: Entering directory `/home/administrativo/xen-4.0.1'' make -f buildconfigs/mk.linux-2.6-pvops prep make[2]: Entering directory `/home/administrativo/xen-4.0.1'' set -ex; \ if ! [ -d linux-2.6-pvops.git ]; then \ rm -rf linux-2.6-pvops.gi...

After download of Xen4.0, Is there a simple way to disable to not download from git implicitly ? (I already did it offline and would like to use that build instead.) Idea is: "make world" would not enforce git automatically. Any suggestions ? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hello, http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/patches/xen-pvscsi-drivers-linux-2.6.32.27-pvops-v01.diff This is the first version of Xen PVSCSI drivers, both the scsiback backend and scsifront frontend, ported from Novell SLES11SP1 2.6.32 Xenlinux kernel to pvops xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch. At the moment it''s *only* compile-tested with the latest xen/stable-2.6.32.x git kernel...

Greetings, Xen gurus! Per the Ubuntu community documentation at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Xen#Maverick%20Notes%20(Xen%204.0.1%20pvops%20on%20Ubuntu%2010.10) I am trying to install Xen 4.0.1 from source which I got from bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/4.0.1/xen-4.0.1.tar.gz because apparently the ubuntu-xen-server package has broken dependencies. The instructions as provided state that gettext, bin86, bcc, libc6-dev-i386, ias...

...why kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot make itself into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora''s Libvirt has the best compatibility with Xen 4.0.1. It''s not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7 aka Suse is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops kernel about 15-20 % under Xen 4.0.1. I don''t mention KVM performance. It''s not a competitor for OpenSuse 11.3 after the most recent "zypper update" Boris. --- On Mon, 10/18/10, M A Young &l...

I am compiling xen from source and each time I do a `make world` it basically gives some or the other error my problem are not those errors ( I am trying to debug them) but the problem is each time when I do a `make world` Xen basically pulls things from git repository    + rm -rf linux-2.6-pvops.git linux-2.6-pvops.git.tmp    + mkdir linux-2.6-pvops.git.tmp    + rmdir linux-2.6-pvops.git.tmp    + git clone -o xen -n git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-pvops.git.tmp    Initialized empty Git repository in /usr/src/xen-4.0.1/linux-2.6-pvops.git.tmp/.git/  ...

Hi All. I''m trying to use xenoprof in my Xeon machine with PVOPS (3.1.0 kernel) & xen 4.1.1. In the past, I had failed to use the xenoprof in this environment. (1 year ago) While baremetal booting shows the counter object in /dev/oprofile/0 (or 1,2,3) , booting with xen fails to create those objects. Of course, opcontrol command doesn''...

my system configuration xen 3.4.2, oprofile 0.9.5( xenoprof patched ), dom0( jeremy''s pvops kernel 2.6.31.6 - patched dullor''s xenoprof patch ), domU( vanilla kernel 2.6.32 with paravirt enabled ), distribution( ubuntu 9.10 ) In passive mode, xenoprof seems to work well, opreport showed good information. but, in active mode, it seems not to be done correctly. my command is str...

...orry if my question is too stupid, i''m trying to compile both XEN 4.0 and the kernel but when i do "make world", according to http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0, i always receive this error: + git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-pvops.git.tmp Initialized empty Git repository in /root/4.0/xen-4.0-testing.hg/linux-2.6-pvops.git.tmp/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 1567030, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (262707/262707), done. Indexing 1567030 objects... remote: Total 1567030 (delta 1304249), reused 1552846 (delta 1291260)...

...oots! I've had an uptime of 40 minutes so far with it. Under intensive disk load it locks up with a soft lockup, but still, this is good progress. I've pushed the current bits to the "WIP" (work-in-progress) branch at the usual git repo, git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git with gitweb at http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git New since the last drop are some MTRR cleanups from Mark McLoughlin, a number of dma-mapping cleanups, and full dma_alloc/free_coherent support, including xen contiguous mapping support. I've also updated it to Linu...

...oots! I've had an uptime of 40 minutes so far with it. Under intensive disk load it locks up with a soft lockup, but still, this is good progress. I've pushed the current bits to the "WIP" (work-in-progress) branch at the usual git repo, git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git with gitweb at http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git New since the last drop are some MTRR cleanups from Mark McLoughlin, a number of dma-mapping cleanups, and full dma_alloc/free_coherent support, including xen contiguous mapping support. I've also updated it to Linu...

...oots! I've had an uptime of 40 minutes so far with it. Under intensive disk load it locks up with a soft lockup, but still, this is good progress. I've pushed the current bits to the "WIP" (work-in-progress) branch at the usual git repo, git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git with gitweb at http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git New since the last drop are some MTRR cleanups from Mark McLoughlin, a number of dma-mapping cleanups, and full dma_alloc/free_coherent support, including xen contiguous mapping support. I've also updated it to Linu...

This one about pvops kernel 2.6.32.24 under Xen 4.0.1 on top of Ubuntu 10.10 Desktop http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/set-up-xen-4-0-1-libvirt-0-8-3-on-top-of-ubuntu-10-10-desktop/ Boris. --- On Thu, 10/21/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote: From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> Subject...

Ian, Jeremy, knowing pretty little about networking, it nevertheless seems to me that the different placement of skb_checksum_setup() (in the receive paths of pv-ops vs in various transmit paths in legacy) poses a compatibility problem (nothing done on either side if sending from pv-ops to legacy, and done on both ends when sending from legacy to pv-ops). Am I overlooking something here? Thanks,

Hi, I've updated the dom0 pvops patches against 2.6.24, and they now have a new git home: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git I'm maintaining the tree in this repo in two separate forms: * Development branch: The master branch is an ongoing, shar...

Hi, I've updated the dom0 pvops patches against 2.6.24, and they now have a new git home: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git I'm maintaining the tree in this repo in two separate forms: * Development branch: The master branch is an ongoing, shar...

Hi, I've updated the dom0 pvops patches against 2.6.24, and they now have a new git home: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git I'm maintaining the tree in this repo in two separate forms: * Development branch: The master branch is an ongoing, shar...

...s Nathanael! -- Pasi ----- Forwarded message from Nathanael Rensen <nathanael@polymorpheus.com> ----- From: Nathanael Rensen <nathanael@polymorpheus.com> To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> Cc: n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 19:32:23 +0800 Subject: Re: pvusb for pvops On 1 January 2011 23:19, Nathanael Rensen <nathanael@polymorpheus.com> wrote: > On 1 January 2011 22:43, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:10:58AM +0800, Nathanael Rensen wrote: >>> Hi Noboru, >>> >>> In case it is...

Hi everybody, I wanted to test the new hypervisor Xen 4.0.0 with the pvops kernel 2.6.31.13 version 64 bit No concerns regarding the compilation and installation, but after install a Windows 2003 server 32 bit I can''t install the drivers gplpv_2003x32_0.11.0.213.msi i had an error: "There is a problem with this Windows Installer package" see attachm...

pvscsi appears to be missing from the pvops kernel. Is there a specific reason for this or has it just not been done yet? James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel