search for: purposely

Hello, It seems that I am in printer hell once again :) I am trying to sort out some printer problems with our UNIX server. The basic problem is this. I have a test server to K.I.S.S the problem. On this server I have defined two queues which are csqlis and HPfinley. csqlis seems to work correctly and displays ready. HPfinley always reads Paused on win2k and NT40 clients. The output of the lpq

Thank you, Clayton. It works now! Our debugger server responds "name:J28;generic:fp;bitsize:32;encoding:uint;format:hex;gcc:60;dwarf:60". And I also set other "generic" attributes like sp, pc, ra, arg1~arg8 to related registers. I dig a little and find llvm dwarf generator uses TargetRegisterInfo::getFrameRegister() to obtain frame base, and uses

Thank you, Clayton. This is very helpful. We use the LLDB specific GDB remote extensions, and our debugger server supports "qRegisterInfo" package. "reg 0x3c" is the frame pointer. In the example mentioned above, we have SP = FP - 40 for current call frame. And variable "a" is stored at address (FP + -24) from asm instruction [FP + -24] = R3;; Thus we can conclude

Does anyone know if is possible to purposely set red alarm status on PRI circuit for testing purposes (other than unplugging it). I have looked for a console command which might allow this.... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070411/9...

Has there been any work done on getting an ACPI fixed event or perhaps a general purpose event delivered to an HVM guest. Whereby, the HVM guests OSPM could consume the event and act accordingly. Or Perhaps better stated how would one go about passing an ACPI fixed event or general purpose event that was raised and consumed by dom0 and subsequently pass the event on to each of the HVM

Hello Everyone I just want to generate an executable using clang++ or clang which uses only general purpose registers from x86. The generated code should not use mmx or any other special purpose register. Thanks a lot -- Regards V Naveen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, I am confused. In one of the examples of a PDC, the following smb.conf parameter is given: add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m -G users '%u' If you have "passdb backend = tdbsam" and the way to add users to "tdbsam" is "pdbedit -a -u username", what is the purpose of the "add user script"? I am thinking it is to add the user

We have a tenant who has been having issues with a congested connection and in trouble shooting it we've noticed that there seems to be a lot of SIP traffic even when none of the phones are doing anything. We've determined that this traffic is mostly INFO packets generated by setting qualify=2000. I understand that 2000 ms is the default value for the qualification parameter but what

Hi, There are 3 new settings (setinterfacevar, setqueueentryvar, setqueuevar) and membermacro settings in 1.6 queues.conf. What is the potential use of these settings? The variables set are useful, but there is no indication of the purpose they could be used? Any one with some light on potential use case of these new features? raj

--- COPYING.GPL | 43 +++++++++++----------- doc/Makefile.am | 6 +-- doc/Makefile.lite | 6 +-- examples/c/decode/file/Makefile.am | 6 +-- examples/c/decode/file/Makefile.lite | 6 +-- examples/c/decode/file/main.c | 6 +--

Rename <purpose>_OPTION to OPT_<purpose> for two reasons: - it is more idiomatic for enum constants to have the same prefix than for them to have the same suffix, - we hew away three characters (length-wise) from each option name, which happens to reduce the max width of "copy/main.c" to 79 characters. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172516

Hi all, I've been looking at some LLVM assembly produced by llvm-gcc lately and I've noticed a recurring statement of which I'm not sure its purpose. For example, the following C program: int main(void) { void (*f)(void) = (0x21332); f(); } When compiled with "llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S" will produce the following code (irrelevant parts removed): define i32 @main()

I've been building/dumping some x86_64 code and I've noticed that each of the routines has 3 temporary symbols, à la: _main: pushq %rbp Ltmp18: movq %rsp, %rbp Ltmp19: subq $320, %rsp Ltmp20: movl %ecx, -276(%rbp) I've tracked them back to emitPrologue in X86RegisterInfo.cpp. I'm wonder what's their purpose? They're filling up my symbol table... Cameron Esfahani

During the excellent flickr video, the presenter adds the following to the applications layout file: <body> <%= yield %> </body> What is the purpose of the ''yield'' line? I would think there would be a content_for_layout tag there instead. Thanks, Don -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, You can try ChanSpy http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+ChanSpy. Idris _____ From: phil.dawson@marnock.com [mailto:phil.dawson@marnock.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:23 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Monitor a particular SIP call for training purposes Hi, I've been asked if it is possible to allow a user to

Hi, When clang/llvm compiles the following sample (with -O2) it optimizes away the second comparison in test1 but not in test2. Is this handling of 'unreachable' by purpose, or is this just a shortcoming of the current optimization passes? GCC and MSVC (with the equivalent code using the __assume intrinsic) both optimize away the comparison in test2. void f1(); void f2(); void

[ Cc: qemu-block ] Am 15.08.2018 um 12:55 hat Richard W.M. Jones geschrieben: > (Adding Stefan who implemented the subcommand) > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:44:44PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 15.08.2018 um 12:26 hat Richard W.M. Jones geschrieben: > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 09:31:06PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:29 PM

I performed a minor amount of refactoring of the build environment for oggdrop. These include: Action: Added a workspace to manage project files and dependencies Purpose: To build all dependent libraries before attempting to build oggdrop -- i.e. provide one-step build process. Instead of opening "oggdrop.dsp", open "oggdrop.dsw" Action: Added

Hi All, I have been reading about general purpose GPU (graphical processing units) computing for computational statistics. I know very little about this, but I read that GPUs currently cannot handle double-precision floating points and also that they are not necessarily IEEE compliant. However, I am not sure what the practical impact of this limitation is likely to be on computational

On Aug 3, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Cameron Esfahani wrote: > I've been building/dumping some x86_64 code and I've noticed that each of the routines has 3 temporary symbols, à la: > > _main: > pushq %rbp > Ltmp18: > movq %rsp, %rbp > Ltmp19: > subq $320, %rsp > Ltmp20: > movl %ecx, -276(%rbp) > > I've tracked them back to emitPrologue in